230 réponses à ce sujet

[Grimwick]

comrade gando wrote...

ah cataman, bringing us such classic topics such as

http://social.biowar.../index/11939483

That's hilarious when you look at what he said just above.


"Some fascists are still good people, and they have the right to spread their ideas, if they so wish. "

Modifié par Grimwick, 27 mai 2012 - 09:00 .

[Catamantaloedis]

Why are you people stuck in the past? This is the topic at hand. I've offered irrefutable evidence of Cerberus' non-indocination and you still focus on my past posts.

[comrade gando]

I've put up irrefutable evidence that you're a TROLL!

and now I should stop feeding you

[Catamantaloedis]

comrade gando wrote...

I've put up irrefutable evidence that you're a TROLL!

and now I should stop feeding you

Troll must = someone you disagree with.

[Peranor]

Insane Troll Logic is the kind of logic that just can't be argued with because it's so demented, so lost in its own insanity, that any attempts to correct it would be met with more gibberish. Logic failure that crosses over into parody or Poe's Law.

Bedevere: "So, logically..."
Peasant: "If...she...weighs...the same as a duck...she's made of wood."
Bedevere: "And therefore...?" 
Another Peasant: "...a witch!"
Crowd: "A witch! A witch! A witch!!" 

    — Monty Python and the Holy Grail
 

Modifié par anorling, 27 mai 2012 - 09:43 .

[Catamantaloedis]

anorling wrote...




Insane Troll Logic is the kind of logic that just can't be argued with because it's so demented, so lost in its own insanity, that any attempts to correct it would be met with more gibberish. Logic failure that crosses over into parody or Poe's Law.

Bedevere: "So, logically..."
Peasant: "If...she...weighs...the same as a duck...she's made of wood."
Bedevere: "And therefore...?" 
Another Peasant: "...a witch!"
Crowd: "A witch! A witch! A witch!!" 

    — Monty Python and the Holy Grail
 

If you have nothing to add, please remove your incoherent drive from my topic.

[Sisterofshane]

Catamantaloedis wrote...

Why are you people stuck in the past? This is the topic at hand. I've offered irrefutable evidence of Cerberus' non-indocination and you still focus on my past posts.

And the only reason you created this thread was to satirize the people who believe that Vendetta offers possible evidence that Shepard is indoctrinated.

The only problem is that you're so dead set upon being oopositional that you now believe in your satirization as truth.

And they have a disorder for that...

Some interesting quotes...

"Children and adolescents with ODD often purposely annoy others..."

" In addition, these young people may appear resentful of others and when
someone does something they don't like they prefer taking revenge more
than sensitive solutions."

[Peranor]

Catamantaloedis wrote...

anorling wrote...




Insane Troll Logic is the kind of logic that just can't be argued with because it's so demented, so lost in its own insanity, that any attempts to correct it would be met with more gibberish. Logic failure that crosses over into parody or Poe's Law. 

Bedevere: "So, logically..." 
Peasant: "If...she...weighs...the same as a duck...she's made of wood." 
Bedevere: "And therefore...?" 
Another Peasant: "...a witch!" 
Crowd: "A witch! A witch! A witch!!" 

    — Monty Python and the Holy Grail 
 

If you have nothing to add, please remove your incoherent drive from my topic.

Listen to yourself. You're lost in your own insanity. Seek medical help before you hurt yourself.

[RaenImrahl]

Please remain on topic. No personal attacks.

If you disagree with the OP's premise, do not reply; let the thread sink slowly into the cool, dark embrace of the forum abyss.

[GreyLycanTrope]

Catamantaloedis wrote...

comrade gando wrote...

I've put up irrefutable evidence that you're a TROLL!

and now I should stop feeding you

Troll must = someone you disagree with.

Yup that's exactly what I was refering to thank you comrade gando for digging it up.

Catman: troll  = someone who clearly makes outrages statements to get a rise out of people. As you clearly do.

[Catamantaloedis]

RaenImrahl wrote...

Please remain on topic. No personal attacks.

If you disagree with the OP's premise, do not reply; let the thread sink slowly into the cool, dark embrace of the forum abyss.

Thank you once again.

[DeathScepter]

Well There is a lot of bad writing within Mass Effect 3.

[Catamantaloedis]

DeathScepter wrote...

Well There is a lot of bad writing within Mass Effect 3.

I disagree completely. This is proof that Bioware hasnt lost a bit of its writing ability.

[xsdob]

1. He found a way to fight the reaper signal and needed to be stopped by his reaper masters. Saren was working on fighting indoctrination as well back in ME1 and the only reason he was allowed to do so was to create a false sense of control and security for saren. Same thing with TIM except he actually found a way.

2. It is not common knowledge, it is contested knowledge and currently in the hypothesis stage of the scientific method. It has to have repeatable and acceptable results from a large majority to be considered a theory.

3. "Yes, but he could never control us because we already controlled him."

4. Because he's more useful to the reapers on a long leash than a short one, his efforts can undermine the organics of this cycle and provide a nice for the reapers to hit targets they would have a harder time getting. They are now a puppet group who preforms precision strikes and actions against the resistance.

5. Well than that's your own opinion on the matter now isn't it.

[TeffexPope]

Catamantaloedis wrote...

I've discussed much about indoctrination tonight, and it's caused me to reach a very disturbing, and enlightening, conclusion: Cerberus is not indcotrinated! Shepard is! He is the true blight on the galaxy.

1. If Cerberus is indoctrinated, then why do the Reapers attack Sanctuary? It is only logical that they wouldn't want to weaken their own agents.
2. Since it has become common knowledge that Shepard is indoctrinated, then why would he be fighting Cerberus? logic dictates that the indoctrinated would be working together, not killing each other.
3. If Cerberus is indoctrinated, then explain how the Catalyst confirms that, yes, the Reapers can be controlled? Thus confirming Cerberus' suspicions?
4. If Cerberus is indoctrinated, then why do they have their own splinter groups like those on Benning? Those groups are actually indoctrinated, not Cerberus or the Illusive Man himself.
5.*********MUCH  MORE EVIDENCE COMING**********

Thus the game becomes quite tragic. The Illusive Man was actually right all along, and it was Shepard who was indoctrinated. The Illusive Man is the true hero story, but is ultimately cut down before he can finally attain his final victory, which the indoctrinated bastard Shepard prevented him from attaining. He was able to make the hard choices which no one else was able to make, in keeping with the themes of the series, and was killed for it.

Bioware, fascist they may be, have now established themselves as the greatest video game storytellers in history. One of the most memorable enemies in the Mass Effect series was the true heros all along.

Nope.jpg

[Catamantaloedis]

You people are extremely naive for believing he Catalyst. It's mindboggling, really. And like you said the Illusive Man found a way to counter indoctrination, therefore he was not indocinated. That's why the Reapers saw him as a threat.

Saren, however, was only fooling himself with his research into indoctrination, therefore the Reapers had no reason to attempt to stop him.

[RADIUMEYEZ]

Catamantaloedis wrote...

You people are extremely naive for believing he Catalyst. It's mindboggling, really. And like you said the Illusive Man found a way to counter indoctrination, therefore he was not indocinated. That's why the Reapers saw him as a threat.

Saren, however, was only fooling himself with his research into indoctrination, therefore the Reapers had no reason to attempt to stop him.

I am so lost what?

Modifié par RADIUMEYEZ, 28 mai 2012 - 01:55 .

[xsdob]

Catamantaloedis wrote...

You people are extremely naive for believing he Catalyst. It's mindboggling, really. And like you said the Illusive Man found a way to counter indoctrination, therefore he was not indocinated. That's why the Reapers saw him as a threat.

Saren, however, was only fooling himself with his research into indoctrination, therefore the Reapers had no reason to attempt to stop him.

What about 2, 4, and 5?

[Mahrac]

If Shepard is Indoctrinated, then Cerberus is not Indoctrinated. Pretty sure that's an association fallacy

[Catamantaloedis]

Mahrac wrote...

If Shepard is Indoctrinated, then Cerberus is not Indoctrinated. Pretty sure that's an association fallacy

If they are both under Reaper influence it is illogical for the Reapers to have their best assets killing each other, especially when Cerberus was doing such a good on distracting the Alliance from its defenses.

[Mahrac]

Catamantaloedis wrote...

Mahrac wrote...

If Shepard is Indoctrinated, then Cerberus is not Indoctrinated. Pretty sure that's an association fallacy

If they are both under Reaper influence it is illogical for the Reapers to have their best assets killing each other, especially when Cerberus was doing such a good on distracting the Alliance from its defenses.

I'm not saying you're wrong. Just that even if both A and B are true, A doesn't support B.

That said, IT  claims that Shepard isn't fully indoctrinated until Cronos Station so until then using the cannon fodder shock troops - Cerberus - to distract Shepard would fit the Reaper's M.O.

[GreyLycanTrope]

Catamantaloedis wrote...

DeathScepter wrote...

Well There is a lot of bad writing within Mass Effect 3.

I disagree completely. This is proof that Bioware hasnt lost a bit of its writing ability.

Your opinion is now proof? Are the tickets now diamonds?

[RADIUMEYEZ]

Greylycantrope wrote...

Catamantaloedis wrote...

DeathScepter wrote...

Well There is a lot of bad writing within Mass Effect 3.

I disagree completely. This is proof that Bioware hasnt lost a bit of its writing ability.

Your opinion is now proof? Are the tickets now diamonds?

LOL

[mauro2222]

Catamantaloedis wrote...

DeathScepter wrote...

Well There is a lot of bad writing within Mass Effect 3.

I disagree completely. This is proof that Bioware hasnt lost a bit of its writing ability.

[Mahrac]

Greylycantrope wrote...

Catamantaloedis wrote...

DeathScepter wrote...

Well There is a lot of bad writing within Mass Effect 3.

I disagree completely. This is proof that Bioware hasnt lost a bit of its writing ability.

Your opinion is now proof? Are the tickets now diamonds?

ssssssh. Don't tell anyone. Save them and sell for profit later.