So, the Illusive Man was right after all [Control Ending support thread]
#2501
Posté 03 juillet 2012 - 11:44
I don't think that Harbinger is willing to give up his flock that easy.
Just saying.
#2502
Posté 03 juillet 2012 - 11:45
Lotsa speculations for everyone.djwhitfield wrote...
I think alot of people know that the Star Child is Harbinger.
I don't think that Harbinger is willing to give up his flock that easy.
Just saying.
#2503
Posté 03 juillet 2012 - 11:48
D24O wrote...
Lotsa speculations for everyone.djwhitfield wrote...
I think alot of people know that the Star Child is Harbinger.
I don't think that Harbinger is willing to give up his flock that easy.
Just saying.
I did enjoy the control ending alot more this time I must confess.
But I really do think theres alot more to in that mets the eye.
I mean we been fighting against the Illusive Man all this time because his a complete and totally awesome phycopath, now all of a sudden his right and he has the paragon ending?
I honestly don't buy that imo.
#2504
Posté 03 juillet 2012 - 11:50
Modifié par nitefyre410, 03 juillet 2012 - 11:51 .
#2505
Posté 03 juillet 2012 - 11:53
nitefyre410 wrote...
Just because his methods were wrong doesn't make his theory wrong... I.E just like Malen and the Genonphage cure if you keep it the data from his research.
We know that the Illusive Man has been indoctronated for along time though, both the Prothean AI and the Starchild said that the Illusive Man and his army were indoctronated. Meaning that anything he talks about or does cannot be trusted.
#2506
Posté 03 juillet 2012 - 11:56
djwhitfield wrote...
nitefyre410 wrote...
Just because his methods were wrong doesn't make his theory wrong... I.E just like Malen and the Genonphage cure if you keep it the data from his research.
We know that the Illusive Man has been indoctronated for along time though, both the Prothean AI and the Starchild said that the Illusive Man and his army were indoctronated. Meaning that anything he talks about or does cannot be trusted.
There is no Indoctrination of Shepard..
The ending are to be taken at face value.
#2507
Posté 03 juillet 2012 - 11:57
Honestly, my Shepard hadn;t been fighitng him because he disagreed with his ideas, moreso because he disagreed with the method. I felt that although it isn;t a bad idea to control reaper tech, there was no time to reaserch it in the middle of the war.djwhitfield wrote...
I did enjoy the control ending alot more this time I must confess.
But I really do think theres alot more to in that mets the eye.
I mean we been fighting against the Illusive Man all this time because his a complete and totally awesome phycopath, now all of a sudden his right and he has the paragon ending?
I honestly don't buy that imo.
#2508
Posté 04 juillet 2012 - 12:01
Being indoctrinated, he was doomed to fail.
Beyond that, he has no bearing on control.
Regarding the creation of new Reapers, the purpose of processing sentients was preserving their knowledge. But it's never stated if the organic component benefited the Reaper itself. I tend to think it has. When the holokid mentioned his creators he said they became the first "true" Reaper. That might just mean the first cuttlefish that actually did what his purpose dictated. But it might also mean the Reaper itself was more advanced. Typically in sci-fi a blend of synthetic and organic means better than both, so I would say creating any new Reapers still requires organics.
That being said we're no longer trying to preserve anything. So new Reapers could be constructed by harvesting non-sentients, particularly since we don't need them being "a nation independent", they're just another vessel for Commander.
#2509
Posté 04 juillet 2012 - 12:08
Just need to finish my Renegade to see if destroy will be as satisfying.
#2510
Posté 04 juillet 2012 - 12:10
#2511
Posté 04 juillet 2012 - 12:13
#2512
Posté 04 juillet 2012 - 12:14
nitefyre410 wrote...
djwhitfield wrote...
nitefyre410 wrote...
Just because his methods were wrong doesn't make his theory wrong... I.E just like Malen and the Genonphage cure if you keep it the data from his research.
We know that the Illusive Man has been indoctronated for along time though, both the Prothean AI and the Starchild said that the Illusive Man and his army were indoctronated. Meaning that anything he talks about or does cannot be trusted.
There is no Indoctrination of Shepard..
The ending are to be taken at face value.
I dident say Shepard was being indoctronated, I said the Illusive Man was,
#2513
Posté 04 juillet 2012 - 12:16
its not, not even close.Master_Smurf wrote...
BW gave me all that I wanted in the Control ending - damn close (no pregnant Liara) to my headcannon.
Just need to finish my Renegade to see if destroy will be as satisfying.
#2514
Posté 04 juillet 2012 - 01:22
CrutchCricket wrote...
TIM's motives for control were questionable. But his theory that control is a good thing was never wrong.
Being indoctrinated, he was doomed to fail.
Beyond that, he has no bearing on control.
Regarding the creation of new Reapers, the purpose of processing sentients was preserving their knowledge. But it's never stated if the organic component benefited the Reaper itself. I tend to think it has. When the holokid mentioned his creators he said they became the first "true" Reaper. That might just mean the first cuttlefish that actually did what his purpose dictated. But it might also mean the Reaper itself was more advanced. Typically in sci-fi a blend of synthetic and organic means better than both, so I would say creating any new Reapers still requires organics.
That being said we're no longer trying to preserve anything. So new Reapers could be constructed by harvesting non-sentients, particularly since we don't need them being "a nation independent", they're just another vessel for Commander.
I expect you'd get a few Reaper Cults forming across the galaxy, so there might be enough volunteers to create a new Reaper. Even Paragon Shepard might allow that if it really was voluntary. Messy, but hey, to each their own! Harbinger could be come the high priest even!!!
#2515
Posté 04 juillet 2012 - 02:18
Ericus wrote...
*Snipe*
I expect you'd get a few Reaper Cults forming across the galaxy, so there might be enough volunteers to create a new Reaper. Even Paragon Shepard might allow that if it really was voluntary. Messy, but hey, to each their own! Harbinger could be come the high priest even!!!
Paragon Shepard... Allow new volunteers for Reaper processing...
If any new "Reapers" are going to be built they are going completely tech based free of any organic processing..
The will even come with a label "Oraginc Free"
The New Catalyst Prime goes against anything that the original Catalyst would do.
and Harbinger is going to be busy being Shepard -Catalyst person bulter.
Modifié par nitefyre410, 04 juillet 2012 - 02:19 .
#2516
Posté 04 juillet 2012 - 03:37
This is unacceptable.
But this doesn't mean further sentient harvests. Like I said there's nothing to preserve, so you can melt down pyjacks if you so wanted. And of course we could also look at cloned tissue, produced on a vast scale, comes pre-melted.
Of course we would need a definite answer on the specifics of what benefits Reapers gain from their organic components.
#2517
Posté 04 juillet 2012 - 03:40
CrutchCricket wrote...
nitfyre there is a chance that Reapers being built without the organic component will be weaker than traditional ones.
This is unacceptable.
But this doesn't mean further sentient harvests. Like I said there's nothing to preserve, so you can melt down pyjacks if you so wanted. And of course we could also look at cloned tissue, produced on a vast scale, comes pre-melted.
Of course we would need a definite answer on the specifics of what benefits Reapers gain from their organic components.
I'm sorry , I did not clarify that statement was made thinking that Shepard would be thinking of ways to improve the Reapers with harvesting oranics... put that wealth of knowledge stored there to use and develop some new tech.
#2518
Posté 04 juillet 2012 - 03:45
But if more Reapers are needed before that point it will do what it must. With the exception of harvesting sentients again. The situation would have to be critical.
#2519
Posté 04 juillet 2012 - 03:51
djwhitfield wrote...
D24O wrote...
Lotsa speculations for everyone.djwhitfield wrote...
I think alot of people know that the Star Child is Harbinger.
I don't think that Harbinger is willing to give up his flock that easy.
Just saying.
I did enjoy the control ending alot more this time I must confess.
But I really do think theres alot more to in that mets the eye.
I mean we been fighting against the Illusive Man all this time because his a complete and totally awesome phycopath, now all of a sudden his right and he has the paragon ending?
I honestly don't buy that imo.
He was right that it's possible to Control reapers. Sanctuary showed that he was making progress towards figuring out how to control Reapers.
The problem wasn't his goals, it was his the way he was trying to pursue his goals. He was literally sacrificing and experimenting on thousands of people just to learn more about Reaper indoctrination. And if he did actually control the Reapers, he would use them to secure human dominance.
Also, there is a Paragon and Renegade version of Control. The Renegade version seemed to be more in line to what TIM wanted, but not the paragon.
#2520
Posté 04 juillet 2012 - 03:54
There is that. But still, I never saw using them as tools to advance the galaxy as a problem. I saw the unethical experiments that may or may not work in the middle of a desperate war as a bigger point of contention that whether we should control the reapers or not.MegaSovereign wrote...
He was right that it's possible to Control reapers. Sanctuary showed that he was making progress towards figuring out how to control Reapers.
The problem wasn't his goals, it was his the way he was trying to pursue his goals. He was literally sacrificing and experimenting on thousands of people just to learn more about Reaper indoctrination. And if he did actually control the Reapers, he would use them to secure human dominance.
Also, there is a Paragon and Renegade version of Control. The Renegade version seemed to be more in line to what TIM wanted, but not the paragon.
#2521
Posté 04 juillet 2012 - 03:59
#2522
Posté 04 juillet 2012 - 04:01
Or the Collector base decesion. Except, lik eyou said, this one actually matters in the end unlike the other two.MegaSovereign wrote...
The whole debate whether you should control or destroy the Reapers mirrors that of rewriting/destroying the geth heretics. In fact, they're pretty much exactly the same minus the scale.
#2523
Posté 04 juillet 2012 - 04:05
MegaSovereign wrote...
The whole debate whether you should control or destroy the Reapers mirrors that of rewriting/destroying the geth heretics. In fact, they're pretty much exactly the same minus the scale.
Thats before ME 3 interesting because my first run through I always rewrote them, I just had guy instinct to read my canon Shep and blow the place up... and low and behold... It was flag needed to bring the Geth and Quarians to peace.
go figure and I never read to the leak script nor did not I know anything about the point system till after Rannoch.
D24O wrote...
Or the Collector base decesion. Except, lik eyou said, this one actually matters in the end unlike the other two.MegaSovereign wrote...
The
whole debate whether you should control or destroy the Reapers mirrors
that of rewriting/destroying the geth heretics. In fact, they're pretty
much exactly the same minus the scale.
I though about that choice for a good 5 minutes... I really was really leaning towards wanting to keep it on my Canon shepard.
Modifié par nitefyre410, 04 juillet 2012 - 04:07 .
#2524
Posté 04 juillet 2012 - 04:06
Modifié par nitefyre410, 04 juillet 2012 - 04:07 .
#2525
Posté 04 juillet 2012 - 04:08
Yeah, it;s such a shame what they did with it.nitefyre410 wrote...
I though about that choice for a good 5 minutes... I really was really leaning towards wanting to keep it on my Canon shepard.





Retour en haut




