Aller au contenu

Photo

So, the Illusive Man was right after all [Control Ending support thread]


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
4520 réponses à ce sujet

#3401
Seival

Seival
  • Members
  • 5 294 messages
Hmm... Just realized, that Catalist-Shepard might start to cooperate with the current Shadow-Broker (i.e. Liara) to modify her organization, so it also becomes a hidden representative of The Reapers. Both the Shadow Broker and the Catalist-Shepard own the most advanced information network of Galactic Civilization, and always know what's happening in governments and societies. Shadow Broker and Catalist-Shepard help each other to gather the information, and observe the Galactic Civilization. And when something major happens, both Shadow Broker's operatives and the Reapers can help Galactic Civilization to resolve the problem without drawing too much unneeded attention...

...At the same time there will be the Council and their Spectres, who can sometimes ask the Shadow Broker for help. The Catalist-Shepard and the Shadow Broker will not interfere with Council and Spectres buisness, but will keep an eye on their activity constantly. So, basically the Galactic Civilization will not have The Reapers in sight (after they will finish helping to rebuild), but will remain under their protection. Everyone, except two small covert organizations, will live and think they build their own destiny only by themselves.

Modifié par Seival, 02 août 2012 - 12:34 .


#3402
incinerator950

incinerator950
  • Members
  • 5 617 messages

I_eat_unicorns wrote...

Anacronian Stryx wrote...

Lets totally forget that after choosing the Control ending the starbrat is shown with a semblance of a smile on his space face..


Are you kidding? I can barley see i that kid's face, just his eyes. Looking for a smile is trying too hard. 


Or the people who think the Reaper horns are actually saying something to you.

#3403
Comsky159

Comsky159
  • Members
  • 1 093 messages

fchopin wrote...

If Shepard becomes part of the collective reapers then what chance is there for Shepard to have sympathy for Humans, if i am part reaper then i would want to harvest all humans to preserve them, Shepard already has access to reaper harvesting so he can communicate with all the different lives that were harvested so he would be happy to have all life forms in these manner.
 
AI’s do feel pain but in a different way, just like the Geth were feeling some kind of pain when Quarians were destroying the collective database they were building, each loss of the Geth mind was giving them pain so they joined the reapers to stop this.
 
Both humans, Geth and reapers can be brainwashed, there is no such thing as immunity all it takes is knowing how.
 
Life is not that simple as thinking Shepard will die and then take over the Reapers and make the reapers stop the harvesting. We only know what Shepard will do when he is alive, when he is dead we have no idea what he would do as he is no longer Shepard, that is why i always pick destroy for my ending.


Think. In destroy the cycle was just going to repeat itself anyway; that was made quite clear. The only reason the geth/quarian debacle was resolved (potentially) was explicitly due to Shepards actions. Shepard was the only one capable of uniting the galaxy in spite of the natural tendency for organics and synthetics to enter conflict, but ultimately he won't be around forever to solve everyone's problems. In this prior-to conceived robust 'cycle of destruction' Commander Shepard is the SINGULAR piece of outlying data; and without him...the galaxy's basically screwed.

Unless you're willing to make Hitler's ultimate 'aryan' style fantasy a reality via synthesis, doesn't it make sense to immortalize Shepard? Keep him around forever as the galactic maternal/paternal figure?

That's what he means when he labels himself the galactic guardian. He's needed because he is 'THE Shepard'. There's nobody else who can manage what he did. You can always argue that some random event will cause the reapers to revert to their original code (which seems fairly outlandish to me in any case), but unless you're willing to destroy what we are, theres no 'ultimate safety' in life, neither in reality nor the ME universe.

It's our best hope for the long term survival of everyone, while allowing every species to exist and co-exist in their own right. And best of all, nobody needs to die for it. Control is by far the most selfless action we are allowed to take (for a paragon anyway I guess).

Modifié par Comsky159, 02 août 2012 - 01:02 .


#3404
fchopin

fchopin
  • Members
  • 5 072 messages

Comsky159 wrote...

fchopin wrote...

If Shepard becomes part of the collective reapers then what chance is there for Shepard to have sympathy for Humans, if i am part reaper then i would want to harvest all humans to preserve them, Shepard already has access to reaper harvesting so he can communicate with all the different lives that were harvested so he would be happy to have all life forms in these manner.
 
AI’s do feel pain but in a different way, just like the Geth were feeling some kind of pain when Quarians were destroying the collective database they were building, each loss of the Geth mind was giving them pain so they joined the reapers to stop this.
 
Both humans, Geth and reapers can be brainwashed, there is no such thing as immunity all it takes is knowing how.
 
Life is not that simple as thinking Shepard will die and then take over the Reapers and make the reapers stop the harvesting. We only know what Shepard will do when he is alive, when he is dead we have no idea what he would do as he is no longer Shepard, that is why i always pick destroy for my ending.


Think. In destroy the cycle was just going to repeat itself anyway; that was made quite clear. The only reason the geth/quarian debacle was resolved (potentially) was explicitly due to Shepards actions. Shepard was the only one capable of uniting the galaxy in spite of the natural tendency for organics and synthetics to enter conflict, but ultimately he won't be around forever to solve everyone's problems. In this prior-to conceived robust 'cycle of destruction' Commander Shepard is the SINGULAR piece of outlying data; and without him...the galaxy's basically screwed.

Unless you're willing to make Hitler's ultimate 'aryan' style fantasy a reality via synthesis, doesn't it make sense to immortalize Shepard? Keep him around forever as the galactic maternal/paternal figure?

That's what he means when he labels himself the galactic guardian. He's needed because he is 'THE Shepard'. There's nobody else who can manage what he did. You can always argue that some random event will cause the reapers to revert to their original code (which seems fairly outlandish to me in any case), but unless you're willing to destroy what we are, theres no 'ultimate safety' in life, neither in reality nor the ME universe.

It's our best hope for the long term survival of everyone, while allowing every species to exist and co-exist in their own right. And best of all, nobody needs to die for it. Control is by far the most selfless action we are allowed to take (for a paragon anyway I guess).



I said i would go but if people keep replying to me then i will defend my opinions.
If you want me to go then stop replying to me.
 
How can the cycle repeat itself if we destroy the reapers? There is no problem, the problem was the original race thought there was a problem and they created the catalyst to find a solution to their problem which has nothing to do with us.
 
We are a different race living in a galaxy with different races and we have our own problems which have nothing to do with synthetics.
 
The galactic shepard as you call him is nothing different than the catalyst, when shepard dies there is no shepard anymore and there is no way you can say what will happen after control takes effect.
What you are doing is hoping that shepard will stop the reapers from harvesting everyone.
Bioware can show whatever they want and say whatever they want if it does not make sense i will not accept it. What they showed is only probabilities of what may happen in the immediate future and has nothing to do what will happen in a few hundred years.
 
If shepard does not destroy the reapers soon after taking control then he will never do so as he will become one of them and no different than the catalyst.

#3405
Ageless Face

Ageless Face
  • Members
  • 2 786 messages

CrutchCricket wrote...
Except they're not creating anything. They're just following someone else's instructions and assembling things like idiots. They might as well be idiots because even idiots can build great tech if someone  (or something) holds their hand every step of the way.


Point still stand. Technology shouldn't not stopped from being created. So what if it's the Reapers who give the technology? What difference does it make? It's not like scientists and tech people won't learn from the tech. They will know how to create, how to do similar things, after a while they'll learn to create new things for themselves, from this type of high level technolgy.

The point isn't about the dangers of tech but rather the complacency of using without understanding. And did you miss Mordin's speech about the follies of uplifting before a species is ready? For all the "not changing" that it did it still nearly wiped out the krogan because they weren't ready for it.


And who said people will use the tech without understanding it first? Just because AI Shep gave the schematics to build a Reaper toy, doesn't mean s/he won't give instructions and information about it?

And there is a difference between the Krogan and other species. Krogan are violant by nature- they say it themelves. Wether you give them advanced technolgy or they will learn it themselves doesn't matter, they would have done so eventually. The other spiecies didn't seem to do something similar with the tech, did they? It's all about their nature. The salarians creating the genophage with their own technolgy proves that even if you have technolgy from someone else, or that you created, you can do terrible things with it. For example, Alfred Nobel created dynamites for mining, shutting down rivers and whatnot. But it was used more for killing people. You can't be "ready" for technology if someone else created it any more than you yourself created.

Governments that accept Reaper help will not stay in power for much longer. You're vastly underestimating the impact of what the Reapers have done, of what they are (or were).


And why would the goverments fall? They will have no threat from the Reapers, they will have no threat from the public (as long as it will stay quite). You think Goverments never take the help of their once enemies when they offer it (and sometimes they do, yes)? If they won't take it, they will fall. Esspecially if there is danger of a war starting to breat, with all the tension that will arise (genophage, looting, A threat of a war with the Geth, if there won't be peace). The species will try to get themselves up to speed as much as possible, even if wars won't actually happen.

On the contrary war is just around the corner. The Reapers have been dealt with but there is still the matter of all the **** individual races have pulled that they still need to answer for. Far from being the land of happiness and chocolate accusations will fly and tensions will build to clear the bad blood. The result will be anything from a 6-way Cold War to full on galactic free-for-all. Allying yourself with the Reapers will be political suicide. Everyone else would turn on you nearly instantly. 

And 200 years? Really? That's barely worth registering to an asari or krogan and far too soon for even humans and turians (don't know the life spans of other species but I'm assuming it's around that ballpark. Salarians an exception obviously) Again, was everything just dandy on the subject of WW2 in the 70s?
The less said or seen of Reapers the better. 



And that's why goeverments will keep this information quiete. And since I'd imagine not only one specific goverment will take the Reapers' help, and unless some species will want to start a war with at least half the galaxy...

And are you kidding? it's being like less than 70 years since the end of WW2, and while I won't say people forgot, the world is even go far to deny things like the Holocaust. People still live since that time. So yes, if 70 years seem like long enough, you can bet 200 is long enough. The only problem I see are with the Krogan, but (at least with Wrex) they will keep themselves busy populating and rebuilding. Besides, I'd imagine Wrex will want to keep them quiete for a while, so there won't be another genophage.

 
Philosophy of identity aside (it won't matter much anyway) Shepard still joined the Reapers. Whether people will believe it's still him or merely an AI version of him is irrelevant. Unlike Saren who's quite clearly dead, Shepard's actions have left a galaxy wide legacy that cannot be ignored or rejected. The Reapers are still around and they are following directives that Shepard set out. It doesn't matter if they believe the man's dead. He created the Overlord. The Reapers might as well convert to Star Destroyers and proclaim humanity the First Galactic Empire. I literally do not have the words right now to explain how repulsed people will be by these notions. Add in the universal hatred of Reapers themselves and you've got yourself nigh-instant rebellion on a galactic scale. Again, the fact that all of these feelings are petty, organic and born of ignorance will make no difference.

In order to let the galaxy recover and grow in its own path, Commander must disappear. It may work only indirectly, through influence, manipulation and cajoling to steer clear of any other disasters. At least until the disconnect.


I'll just say that I don't agree, it's just one possible outcome. The galaxy also might see Shepard as a god that changed the Reapers, got them to leave them alone, one who saved them. People's reactions are different. I definitely wouldn't be surprised if people would start a religion about Shepard, a cult or whatever. in the stargazer scene, with how the kid and the stargazer talk about Shepard, it actually seemed like what happened. No, it's not what I want. As I said, I'll keep the Reapers away, so both of the outcomes, wether be repulsed by Shepard or warship him/her like a god won't happen.

#3406
kolibri_

kolibri_
  • Members
  • 11 messages

fchopin wrote...

There is no problem, the problem was the original race thought there was
a problem and they created the catalyst to find a solution to their
problem which has nothing to do with us



Nothing to do with us? Have you ever heard of the Geth? Those are some synthetics that achieved a certain level of artificial intelligence and self-awareness. And then there was war. Sounds familiar, doesn't it? The reapers were created, because some super advanced species found out, that this cycle (organics create AI, AI evolves too fast, one side starts a war) repeats itself. That's why they came up with the Catalyst to solve this universal problem.

So it's most likely that some time after the Epilogue, a new kind of AI will be created and everything starts anew.



fchopin wrote...
If shepard does not destroy the reapers soon after taking control then
he will never do so as he will become one of them and no different than
the catalyst.


That is only your assumption. You have no psychological profile of Shepard, you have no idea how it is to become an AI, you have no idea what it's like to be connected to the reapers. If you want to discuss any aspect of the endings, bring facts and not only your imagination. ;)

#3407
fchopin

fchopin
  • Members
  • 5 072 messages

kolibri_ wrote...

fchopin wrote...

There is no problem, the problem was the original race thought there was
a problem and they created the catalyst to find a solution to their
problem which has nothing to do with us



Nothing to do with us? Have you ever heard of the Geth? Those are some synthetics that achieved a certain level of artificial intelligence and self-awareness. And then there was war. Sounds familiar, doesn't it? The reapers were created, because some super advanced species found out, that this cycle (organics create AI, AI evolves too fast, one side starts a war) repeats itself. That's why they came up with the Catalyst to solve this universal problem.

So it's most likely that some time after the Epilogue, a new kind of AI will be created and everything starts anew.



fchopin wrote...
If shepard does not destroy the reapers soon after taking control then
he will never do so as he will become one of them and no different than
the catalyst.


That is only your assumption. You have no psychological profile of Shepard, you have no idea how it is to become an AI, you have no idea what it's like to be connected to the reapers. If you want to discuss any aspect of the endings, bring facts and not only your imagination. ;)



From what i know the Geth did not attack anyone until the quarians started to kill them so all i see is the Geth defending themselves. If you look at the history of Earth the strong countries usually attack the weaker ones to take all the treasures and make people slaves so history tells us that we are the troublemakers and not AI’s as far as we know.
That does not mean that the Geth would not attack us in a few hundred years as anything is possible.
 
You say i have no proof that shepard would not become like the catalyst as time passes but you have no proof either that shepard will control the reapers and help humanity and the other races.
 
It’s easy to say that shepard will stop the reapers from the harvesting in the beginning but it is not so easy to say what shepard will become as years pass and the human feelings disappear.
Thirty or forty years are nothing compared to thousands of years so don’t expect me to think that shepard would stay the same after a few thousand years as i have a mind and know what happens and how people change with time.

#3408
DirtyPhoenix

DirtyPhoenix
  • Members
  • 3 938 messages

incinerator950 wrote...

I_eat_unicorns wrote...

Anacronian Stryx wrote...

Lets totally forget that after choosing the Control ending the starbrat is shown with a semblance of a smile on his space face..


Are you kidding? I can barley see i that kid's face, just his eyes. Looking for a smile is trying too hard. 


Or the people who think the Reaper horns are actually saying something to you.


Yes I saw a smile too, but whats that ot to do with this anyhow? (unless you believe in IT). There can be a hundred reasons, (non-IT reasons) why he smiled.  People see what the want to see and hear what they want to hear. Its an age-old trick that our mind lays on us.

#3409
DirtyPhoenix

DirtyPhoenix
  • Members
  • 3 938 messages

fchopin wrote...

From what i know the Geth did not attack anyone until the quarians started to kill them so all i see is the Geth defending themselves. If you look at the history of Earth the strong countries usually attack the weaker ones to take all the treasures and make people slaves so history tells us that we are the troublemakers and not AI’s as far as we know.


Look, the catalyst nowhere tells that the AIs are the troublemakers and organics are holier than the pope. He just states that they will come into conflict, for whatever reasons, with each other because of the fundamental incompatibilt in their nature. And, because AIs evolve faster than organics, its the organics who will most probably end up losing; what we saw happening to the Quarians.

#3410
Lord Goose

Lord Goose
  • Members
  • 865 messages

no proof either that
shepard will control the reapers and help humanity and the
other races.


Except he states his intentions to help and protect everyone clear and explicit. And we have no obligation to prove negative (i.e. we do not have to prove that he will not go insane).

#3411
Seival

Seival
  • Members
  • 5 294 messages

fchopin wrote...

Comsky159 wrote...

fchopin wrote...

If Shepard becomes part of the collective reapers then what chance is there for Shepard to have sympathy for Humans, if i am part reaper then i would want to harvest all humans to preserve them, Shepard already has access to reaper harvesting so he can communicate with all the different lives that were harvested so he would be happy to have all life forms in these manner.
 
AI’s do feel pain but in a different way, just like the Geth were feeling some kind of pain when Quarians were destroying the collective database they were building, each loss of the Geth mind was giving them pain so they joined the reapers to stop this.
 
Both humans, Geth and reapers can be brainwashed, there is no such thing as immunity all it takes is knowing how.
 
Life is not that simple as thinking Shepard will die and then take over the Reapers and make the reapers stop the harvesting. We only know what Shepard will do when he is alive, when he is dead we have no idea what he would do as he is no longer Shepard, that is why i always pick destroy for my ending.


Think. In destroy the cycle was just going to repeat itself anyway; that was made quite clear. The only reason the geth/quarian debacle was resolved (potentially) was explicitly due to Shepards actions. Shepard was the only one capable of uniting the galaxy in spite of the natural tendency for organics and synthetics to enter conflict, but ultimately he won't be around forever to solve everyone's problems. In this prior-to conceived robust 'cycle of destruction' Commander Shepard is the SINGULAR piece of outlying data; and without him...the galaxy's basically screwed.

Unless you're willing to make Hitler's ultimate 'aryan' style fantasy a reality via synthesis, doesn't it make sense to immortalize Shepard? Keep him around forever as the galactic maternal/paternal figure?

That's what he means when he labels himself the galactic guardian. He's needed because he is 'THE Shepard'. There's nobody else who can manage what he did. You can always argue that some random event will cause the reapers to revert to their original code (which seems fairly outlandish to me in any case), but unless you're willing to destroy what we are, theres no 'ultimate safety' in life, neither in reality nor the ME universe.

It's our best hope for the long term survival of everyone, while allowing every species to exist and co-exist in their own right. And best of all, nobody needs to die for it. Control is by far the most selfless action we are allowed to take (for a paragon anyway I guess).



I said i would go but if people keep replying to me then i will defend my opinions.
If you want me to go then stop replying to me.
 
How can the cycle repeat itself if we destroy the reapers? There is no problem, the problem was the original race thought there was a problem and they created the catalyst to find a solution to their problem which has nothing to do with us.
 
We are a different race living in a galaxy with different races and we have our own problems which have nothing to do with synthetics.
 
The galactic shepard as you call him is nothing different than the catalyst, when shepard dies there is no shepard anymore and there is no way you can say what will happen after control takes effect.
What you are doing is hoping that shepard will stop the reapers from harvesting everyone.
Bioware can show whatever they want and say whatever they want if it does not make sense i will not accept it. What they showed is only probabilities of what may happen in the immediate future and has nothing to do what will happen in a few hundred years.
 
If shepard does not destroy the reapers soon after taking control then he will never do so as he will become one of them and no different than the catalyst.


Even AIs have self-preservation mechanisms. Of course Shepard-Catalist will not destroy "The Reapers", because Shepard-Catalist is "The Reapers". Control option is not for the ones, who want to Destroy or Synthesise. It's for the ones who want to avoid additional deaths to stop the Reapers, and at the same time want the new Catalist, which will not repeat the original Catalist's mistakes...

...And especially for the ones, who don't want to take some epilogues seriously, game gives a pop-up, which states that the Reaper threat was stopped. If you don't want to believe even such obvious things, then there is only one possible conclusion - you are trying to imagine your own endings, which were never intended by developers. And this is not an interpretation of an ending, this is just a fan-fiction.

#3412
Ageless Face

Ageless Face
  • Members
  • 2 786 messages

Seival wrote... 
...And especially for the ones, who don't want to take some epilogues seriously, game gives a pop-up, which states that the Reaper threat was stopped. If you don't want to believe even such obvious things, then there is only one possible conclusion - you are trying to imagine your own endings, which were never intended by developers. And this is not an interpretation of an ending, this is just a fan-fiction.


I'm gussing what I told you doesn't mean much, is it? Well I'll repeat myself nonetheless.

Don't you speculate about the outcome of the endings? And how do you know that is what the develpoers intended? The only thing the devs intended was that people will specualte. So how come fchopin is missing the point? how come does s/he imagine his/her own ending?

It's not for you to decide what BioWare intended and what not. Your interpretation is not the correct one until BioWare will say it is. And they didn't, so...

#3413
Y3Y00

Y3Y00
  • Members
  • 215 messages

estebanus wrote...



I knda find it interesting what destroy and control represent in the EC epilogue.

Destroy hinges more on the combined species forming a better bond amongst each other. That no species will ever abandon the other again. Granted, there will be challenges, but nothing that they can't overcome. Hence Hackett's "Together, we can forge a galaxy greater than any one of us can imagine."

Control seems more like the reapers doing it all, which also isn't bad of course. It just seems to me that in that epilogue, the species don't really work together like they did during the war. It's like they just sit back and let the reapers do everything for them. Hence Shepard's "I will lead the many into a future greater than they could possibly imagine."

Synthesis... Well, I still can't figure that one out, and I probably never will...




Very perceptive and a reasonable interpretation. Although in this sense, I'd prefer Destroy :) 

#3414
Seival

Seival
  • Members
  • 5 294 messages

fchopin wrote...

kolibri_ wrote...

fchopin wrote...

There is no problem, the problem was the original race thought there was
a problem and they created the catalyst to find a solution to their
problem which has nothing to do with us



Nothing to do with us? Have you ever heard of the Geth? Those are some synthetics that achieved a certain level of artificial intelligence and self-awareness. And then there was war. Sounds familiar, doesn't it? The reapers were created, because some super advanced species found out, that this cycle (organics create AI, AI evolves too fast, one side starts a war) repeats itself. That's why they came up with the Catalyst to solve this universal problem.

So it's most likely that some time after the Epilogue, a new kind of AI will be created and everything starts anew.



fchopin wrote...
If shepard does not destroy the reapers soon after taking control then
he will never do so as he will become one of them and no different than
the catalyst.


That is only your assumption. You have no psychological profile of Shepard, you have no idea how it is to become an AI, you have no idea what it's like to be connected to the reapers. If you want to discuss any aspect of the endings, bring facts and not only your imagination. ;)



From what i know the Geth did not attack anyone until the quarians started to kill them so all i see is the Geth defending themselves. If you look at the history of Earth the strong countries usually attack the weaker ones to take all the treasures and make people slaves so history tells us that we are the troublemakers and not AI’s as far as we know.
That does not mean that the Geth would not attack us in a few hundred years as anything is possible.
 
You say i have no proof that shepard would not become like the catalyst as time passes but you have no proof either that shepard will control the reapers and help humanity and the other races.
 
It’s easy to say that shepard will stop the reapers from the harvesting in the beginning but it is not so easy to say what shepard will become as years pass and the human feelings disappear.
Thirty or forty years are nothing compared to thousands of years so don’t expect me to think that shepard would stay the same after a few thousand years as i have a mind and know what happens and how people change with time.


Again, if the epilogues and the pop-up are not enough proof for you, then you are just refusing to take the game seriously. Then why are you discussing it at all? Why you even defending Destroy ending if what the game tells is nothing for you? If what you are saying is really your point of view, then you should accept that your favorite Destroy ending will have even more horrible long-term consequences, than "Cycles restart"...

...So, maybe you believe something in game only selectively? Destroy epilogue is a good proof for you, while Control epilogues somehow aren't. That is called double standards. How will you reply if I'll say: "It's obvious that in case of Destroy all races will become to study dead Reapers. Even dead Reapers can indoctrinate and turn people into hasks. So the entire Galactic Civilization will end up in totaly devastating civil war, and everyone will die"? How can you prove that I'm wrong? Only by referring to the game itself.

...You may dislike Control, but first you should understand it.

#3415
estebanus

estebanus
  • Members
  • 5 987 messages

Y3Y00 wrote...

estebanus wrote...



I knda find it interesting what destroy and control represent in the EC epilogue.

Destroy hinges more on the combined species forming a better bond amongst each other. That no species will ever abandon the other again. Granted, there will be challenges, but nothing that they can't overcome. Hence Hackett's "Together, we can forge a galaxy greater than any one of us can imagine."

Control seems more like the reapers doing it all, which also isn't bad of course. It just seems to me that in that epilogue, the species don't really work together like they did during the war. It's like they just sit back and let the reapers do everything for them. Hence Shepard's "I will lead the many into a future greater than they could possibly imagine."

Synthesis... Well, I still can't figure that one out, and I probably never will...




Very perceptive and a reasonable interpretation. Although in this sense, I'd prefer Destroy :) 

Grazie.

Although, me being a destroyer, I guess my interpretation is kinda biased.

Modifié par estebanus, 02 août 2012 - 04:05 .


#3416
Seival

Seival
  • Members
  • 5 294 messages

HagarIshay wrote...

Seival wrote... 
...And especially for the ones, who don't want to take some epilogues seriously, game gives a pop-up, which states that the Reaper threat was stopped. If you don't want to believe even such obvious things, then there is only one possible conclusion - you are trying to imagine your own endings, which were never intended by developers. And this is not an interpretation of an ending, this is just a fan-fiction.


I'm gussing what I told you doesn't mean much, is it? Well I'll repeat myself nonetheless.

Don't you speculate about the outcome of the endings? And how do you know that is what the develpoers intended? The only thing the devs intended was that people will specualte. So how come fchopin is missing the point? how come does s/he imagine his/her own ending?

It's not for you to decide what BioWare intended and what not. Your interpretation is not the correct one until BioWare will say it is. And they didn't, so...


The point of an epilogue is to explain the outcome. It serves no other purposes. Some details are arguable, but not the main concept. For example, If I'll say that "Geth survived in Destroy ending", then I'll be wrong, because Geth survival in Destroy wasn't intended. Geth survival in Destroy can only exist as a fan-fiction, and can be respected only as a fan-fiction, not an interpretation of the ending...

...The same situation here. Fchopin likes Destroy, and has a fan-fiction about Control. But somehow he thinks that fan-fiction is an interpretation, and continue to argue about that.

Modifié par Seival, 02 août 2012 - 04:08 .


#3417
Ageless Face

Ageless Face
  • Members
  • 2 786 messages

Seival wrote...
The point of an epilogue is to explain the outcome. It serves no other purposes. Some details are arguable, but not the main concept. For example, If I'll say that "Geth survived in Destroy ending", then I'll be wrong, because Geth survival in Destroy wasn't intended. Geth survival in Destroy can only exists as a fan-fiction, and can be respected only as a fan-fiction, not an interpretation of the ending...

...The same situation here. Fchopin likes Destroy, and has a fan-fiction about Control. But somehow he thinks that fan-fiction is an interpretation, and continue to argue about that.


The point of the epilouge is to tell us the future. But a future is not absolute, and people can interperate the epilouge however they'd like. We have no right to tell people that their interpetation is wrong without cold hard evidences to support our claims. "Symolism" is not an evidence.

And if people want to believe that the Geth survived, then they are free to do so, even when they were told wrong. Just like we can believe we can create something like EDI and continue the romance forever and ever, even though we were told by the catalyst that we can't do that, AI Shep's will have no connection with the galaxy.

And what was said before is not like the Geth, it has nothing to do with that. fchopin was interpetating that the future is not all what is said in the epilouge. You can't say that just because the epilouge is an epilouge, the future will be exactly as it says. Yes, there are evidences (Lord Goose said it for me). But the epilouge being the ending is not one of them. What, do you really think everything in the epilouge, in all three endings, is as bright as Hackett, AIShep and EDI makes it to be?

You hate refuse. You interpetate this ending as surrender. And even me, who hates this ending, know it's stupid to think that. Shepard didn't surrender, you can say it was quite the oppisite. So what, is your interpretation is now fan-fiction? People are allowed to think what they want about the endings, I imagine fchopin chose destroy for a reason, s/he didn't control. But the fact s/he likes another ending shouldn't matter anyway.

#3418
Seival

Seival
  • Members
  • 5 294 messages

HagarIshay wrote...

Seival wrote...
The point of an epilogue is to explain the outcome. It serves no other purposes. Some details are arguable, but not the main concept. For example, If I'll say that "Geth survived in Destroy ending", then I'll be wrong, because Geth survival in Destroy wasn't intended. Geth survival in Destroy can only exists as a fan-fiction, and can be respected only as a fan-fiction, not an interpretation of the ending...

...The same situation here. Fchopin likes Destroy, and has a fan-fiction about Control. But somehow he thinks that fan-fiction is an interpretation, and continue to argue about that.


The point of the epilouge is to tell us the future. But a future is not absolute, and people can interperate the epilouge however they'd like. We have no right to tell people that their interpetation is wrong without cold hard evidences to support our claims. "Symolism" is not an evidence.

And if people want to believe that the Geth survived, then they are free to do so, even when they were told wrong. Just like we can believe we can create something like EDI and continue the romance forever and ever, even though we were told by the catalyst that we can't do that, AI Shep's will have no connection with the galaxy.

And what was said before is not like the Geth, it has nothing to do with that. fchopin was interpetating that the future is not all what is said in the epilouge. You can't say that just because the epilouge is an epilouge, the future will be exactly as it says. Yes, there are evidences (Lord Goose said it for me). But the epilouge being the ending is not one of them. What, do you really think everything in the epilouge, in all three endings, is as bright as Hackett, AIShep and EDI makes it to be?

You hate refuse. You interpetate this ending as surrender. And even me, who hates this ending, know it's stupid to think that. Shepard didn't surrender, you can say it was quite the oppisite. So what, is your interpretation is now fan-fiction? People are allowed to think what they want about the endings, I imagine fchopin chose destroy for a reason, s/he didn't control. But the fact s/he likes another ending shouldn't matter anyway.


Yes, just like those people don't have a right to tell us that our interpretations are wrong. Showing a mirror to those people works perfectly. They either become constructive (which is more preferable), or just leave the thread.

#3419
Ageless Face

Ageless Face
  • Members
  • 2 786 messages

Seival wrote...
Yes, just like those people don't have a right to tell us that our interpretations are wrong. Showing a mirror to those people works perfectly. They either become constructive (which is more preferable), or just leave the thread.


And I don't recall fchopin telling us we were wrong. Just that the interpretation is not absolute, and his/her interpretation on the subject is valid and should be a concern about control. While I don't agree, and I said, what Lord Goose says covers that in my opinion, doesn't mean fchopin should not voice the concern.

#3420
CrutchCricket

CrutchCricket
  • Members
  • 7 747 messages

HagarIshay wrote...
Point still stand. Technology shouldn't not stopped from being created. So what if it's the Reapers who give the technology? What difference does it make? It's not like scientists and tech people won't learn from the tech. They will know how to create, how to do similar things, after a while they'll learn to create new things for themselves, from this type of high level technolgy.

Did they? Did anyone learn anything before?  Let's look at species that have been around for a while, like the asari. Why are we, the upstarts that just came in 100 years ago developing ships that are just as good as theirs, when they've been around for millenia (and have hoarded extra prothean tech to boot)? And don't give me the DA or dreadnaughts in general, that's a political limitation- we just aren't allowed to build as many. The point is the asari have been at this for millenia and have learned nothing new. Everything is copypasta tech. Why? Because no one earned it. They just use it. And why shouldn't they? Why bother innovating when everything you want is already there?
Hell bring this closer to home. You have a computer. Do you know any technical details about what makes your computer run? Could you replicate it? Do you even care? No, because you just bought it. If it breaks, someone will build you another. The difference is while this individual level complacency is fine (not everyone needs to be a computer expert) it is unacceptable at the species level. You and I are not computer experts, and that's ok. But our species has learned and developed computer technology. And it continues to develop it. They didn't go to space Costco to get it.

And who said people will use the tech without understanding it first? Just because AI Shep gave the schematics to build a Reaper toy, doesn't mean s/he won't give instructions and information about it?

Precedent. Again, how much did people really understand the tech they were using before? And it came with plenty of instructions from the Protheans.

And there is a difference between the Krogan and other species. Krogan are violant by nature- they say it themelves. Wether you give them advanced technolgy or they will learn it themselves doesn't matter, they would have done so eventually. The other spiecies didn't seem to do something similar with the tech, did they? It's all about their nature. The salarians creating the genophage with their own technolgy proves that even if you have technolgy from someone else, or that you created, you can do terrible things with it. For example, Alfred Nobel created dynamites for mining, shutting down rivers and whatnot. But it was used more for killing people. You can't be "ready" for technology if someone else created it any more than you yourself created.

The krogan speak to a different aspect of this idea, a more general one really. It's not so much about technology itself as it is about mastering any sort of knowledge or skill. The point is that in doing it yourself, in working on your own to master something, you also gain the wisdom and discipline to use it. Take mastery of a martial art for example. A karate master can kill with his bare hands. But he won't. Why? Because the process he went through to learn those techniques also gave him the discipline of mind to not just karate chop the next guy that pisses him off to death. Now if he had simply downloaded karate training a la Matrix into his head, without actually training, that understanding would not have occured and this guy could be a menace.
That's what applies to the krogan. Krogan are war-like by nature. But developing spaceflight requires putting that aside and working together. If they had been able to do so and sustain it, it would've been a whole different story. Because in working towards building spaceships they would've learned through experience that cooperation, not violence is the key to their ascension. And if they were able to stick to that, they would've earned their ascension.
Instead, the salarians ****ed them over. They came down and said "**** all that, here's some spaceships now go kill the giant bugs." They denied them that understanding and instead fed their warlike natures. And they wonder where it all went wrong...

And why would the goverments fall? They will have no threat from the Reapers, they will have no threat from the public (as long as it will stay quite). You think Goverments never take the help of their once enemies when they offer it (and sometimes they do, yes)? If they won't take it, they will fall. Esspecially if there is danger of a war starting to breat, with all the tension that will arise (genophage, looting, A threat of a war with the Geth, if there won't be peace). The species will try to get themselves up to speed as much as possible, even if wars won't actually happen.

The Reapers tried to wipe out all life in the galaxy. They liquified people to make more Reapers and mutated the ones they didn't, perverting their lives and turning them into grotesque twisted tools. Do you really not understand the gravity of these actions and how repugnant they are to the general populace? The Reapers will never be accepted by regular people. They can't. Before logic and reason can even kick in, gut instincs will recoil from their very mention.
And you now expect governments (who are still made of people, let me remind you) to work with the Reapers and keep it quiet? Such a thing can't be kept quiet and if even the slightest leak ever gets out the ****shtorm it generates will make all previous wars look like playground scraps. And don't denature it by just calling the Reapers "enemies". They are not conventional enemies. They don't just want to subjugate us or take our land, or impose their beliefs on us. They want to wipe us out, wipe out everything about us out. Humanity has never faced such a threat (I'm talking in real life now) and as such its hard to come to terms with the scale of the impact this would have. Fiction tends to just gloss over it because we need happy endings. But we're talking permanent scars on an entire species. Even mention of contact with Reapers is digging a finger in the open wound of the psyche of an entire race. And there is no reward great enough to even consider such an act.

And are you kidding? it's being like less than 70 years since the end of WW2, and while I won't say people forgot, the world is even go far to deny things like the Holocaust. People still live since that time. So yes, if 70 years seem like long enough, you can bet 200 is long enough. The only problem I see are with the Krogan, but (at least with Wrex) they will keep themselves busy populating and rebuilding. Besides, I'd imagine Wrex will want to keep them quiete for a while, so there won't be another genophage.

You misunderstand. Asari live for 1000 years. 200 years is a 5th of that time. For simplicity's sake let's say humans live for 100 years. 100/5=20. 200 years for an asari is like 20 years for a human. Now tell me everything was just dandy in 1965 (20 years after WW2)
Yes people will move on. But you know what's helped people move on? The fact that the war, its atrocities and the people who caused them are gone (for the most part). It's in the past. The infection is gone, the organism can begin healing. Again if the SS was still around (and what's more working with your local government!) everything would not be A-Ok.

 
I'll just say that I don't agree, it's just one possible outcome. The galaxy also might see Shepard as a god that changed the Reapers, got them to leave them alone, one who saved them. People's reactions are different. I definitely wouldn't be surprised if people would start a religion about Shepard, a cult or whatever. in the stargazer scene, with how the kid and the stargazer talk about Shepard, it actually seemed like what happened. No, it's not what I want.

Shepard is almost irrelevant to this point. The Reapers are still around, and they're still acting, acting upon us. It doesn't matter what Shepard's involvement is. And truthfully the concept of one man rising to control a nigh-cosmic force is really hard to wrap your head around. Just look at all the people on the BSN who still have trouble with it and doubt it. And they know how and why it happened. Average Joe NPC on Illium isn't going to know ****.
The cult of "The Shepard" is something I see rising regardless. Space Grandpa always says "the Shepard" in every ending and it does seem like a natural occurence. Even if you pick destroy, Shepard was already well within Space Jesus territory. Because he succeeds in stopping the Reapers, some people will start worshipping him regardless.

As I said, I'll keep the Reapers away, so both of the outcomes, wether be repulsed by Shepard or warship him/her like a god won't happen.

The beginning of a compromise then. Commander can't directly intervene in galactic politics and that includes directly liasing with any governing body or giving out tech. It can still work through indirect means keeping out of sight but using agents to steer the galaxy away from further disaster as needed. At least until the disconnect.

Good?

Modifié par CrutchCricket, 02 août 2012 - 05:10 .


#3421
Seival

Seival
  • Members
  • 5 294 messages

HagarIshay wrote...

Seival wrote...
Yes, just like those people don't have a right to tell us that our interpretations are wrong. Showing a mirror to those people works perfectly. They either become constructive (which is more preferable), or just leave the thread.


And I don't recall fchopin telling us we were wrong. Just that the interpretation is not absolute, and his/her interpretation on the subject is valid and should be a concern about control. While I don't agree, and I said, what Lord Goose says covers that in my opinion, doesn't mean fchopin should not voice the concern.


Just look at the first fchopin's post here:

fchopin wrote...

Yes the illusive man was correct, if shepard chooses control he takes over starchild’s job and becomes the new reaper boss which will appear for the next race that makes it to the citadel to give them the 3 choices.

Control is replacement of starchild.


All subsequent replies were not much better. There is zero toleration of other people opinions is such posts. And when someone shows zero tolerance to your opinion, you shouldn't show any tolerance to his opinion. Tolerance can work only in both ways at the same time. If there is no "both ways toleration", then there is no toleration at all.

#3422
Seival

Seival
  • Members
  • 5 294 messages
...Also, I think we should move our discussion of some people behaviour to private messages section. Let's stay on topic here :)

#3423
Ageless Face

Ageless Face
  • Members
  • 2 786 messages
[quote]Seival wrote...
And I don't recall fchopin telling us we were wrong. Just that the interpretation is not absolute, and his/her interpretation on the subject is valid and should be a concern about control. While I don't agree, and I said, what Lord Goose says covers that in my opinion, doesn't mean fchopin should not voice the concern.[/quote]

Just look at the first fchopin's post here:

[quote]fchopin wrote...

Yes the illusive man was correct, if shepard chooses control he takes over starchild’s job and becomes the new reaper boss which will appear for the next race that makes it to the citadel to give them the 3 choices.

Control is replacement of starchild.[/quote]

All subsequent replies were not much better. There is zero toleration of other people opinions is such posts. And when someone shows zero tolerance to your opinion, you shouldn't show any tolerance to his opinion. Tolerance can work only in both ways at the same time. If there is no "both ways toleration", then there is no toleration at all.[/quote]

Then fchopin corrected him/herself:

[quote]fchopin wrote...
Ok you are correct i did say that and i will try to explain why. 

*snip* 

...You will ask why i believe Shepard will become another starchild and my answer is why would he not become another starchild, Shepard is no longer Shepard or human but an advanced AI or whatever he has become. 
[/quote] 

And notice that fchopin doesn't say anything to say we are wrong, simply try to explain why s/he believes that, even in the original post. The first post weas simply fchopin trying to tell us voice his/her opinion about the future. Zero tolorance to what exactly? To the opinion we never voiced to fchopin before? It was to start a conversation, not to say our opinion is false. Not every person that voice their opinion has zero tollarance. Fchopin, as I said before, never told anyone (in here, at least) that their interepatation is false, that they are wrong. S/he said his/her interpretation and/or specualtion and/or assumption is also valid, and ours is not absolute.

EDIT: Fine, done arguing about this in here.

Modifié par HagarIshay, 02 août 2012 - 05:43 .


#3424
incinerator950

incinerator950
  • Members
  • 5 617 messages
I am not reading all of that.

#3425
Seival

Seival
  • Members
  • 5 294 messages
@HagarIshay
You should read all his posts here. And as I said, we better discuss it only via PMs :)

@fchopin
Short final answer to you (and to all similar Destroyers by the way). We have no 100% proof that Shepard-Catalist will not restart the Cycles, and you have no 100% proof that Shepard-Catalist will restart the Cycles. If you can't agree even with that, then you are just trying to troll the opposing ending's camp.

Modifié par Seival, 02 août 2012 - 06:04 .