Aller au contenu

Photo

So, the Illusive Man was right after all [Control Ending support thread]


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
4520 réponses à ce sujet

#3526
Dwailing

Dwailing
  • Members
  • 4 566 messages

pirate1802 wrote...

TheStupidJellyFish wrote...

Which is what I do not get.

How is control potrayed as more positive than destroy? The destroy epilogue also has a sense of hope.

Only synthesis is potrayed as sugar-sweet to the point one get diabetes just watching it.

But both control and destroy are balanced in their potrayel, hell even refuse ends on a bittersweet note with the stargazer scene.

The only ending that is potrayed as negative is low EMS destroy.


The process of synthesis itself represents the biggest drawback in synthesis. Ask people what they don't like in synthesis, they'd tell you. The sugar-sweet feeling also leads some to believe everyone is indoctrinated.


Well, you have to admit, it seems a little strange in Synthesis that Javik is still alive.  A guy with beliefs like his?  If he was in his right mind, he'd probably have commited suicide the moment he saw what had happened to him and everyone.

#3527
DirtyPhoenix

DirtyPhoenix
  • Members
  • 3 938 messages

Dwailing wrote...

Well, you have to admit, it seems a little strange in Synthesis that Javik is still alive.  A guy with beliefs like his?  If he was in his right mind, he'd probably have commited suicide the moment he saw what had happened to him and everyone.


Well, he probably would do so, or go on a lifelong mission of vengeance on the reapers. In my headcanon I like to think of him as the primary antagonist in a post-synthesis world. The thing is, We only see Javik ONCE, at the memorial scene, and thats probably a short while after the synthesis beam went out. Its perfectly be reasonable that he'd not want to create a scene at his commander's memorial service, and do his stuff after they're done. Heck he may not even have figured out at that time wtf just happened.

#3528
Seival

Seival
  • Members
  • 5 294 messages

Dwailing wrote...

pirate1802 wrote...

TheStupidJellyFish wrote...

Which is what I do not get.

How is control potrayed as more positive than destroy? The destroy epilogue also has a sense of hope.

Only synthesis is potrayed as sugar-sweet to the point one get diabetes just watching it.

But both control and destroy are balanced in their potrayel, hell even refuse ends on a bittersweet note with the stargazer scene.

The only ending that is potrayed as negative is low EMS destroy.


The process of synthesis itself represents the biggest drawback in synthesis. Ask people what they don't like in synthesis, they'd tell you. The sugar-sweet feeling also leads some to believe everyone is indoctrinated.


Well, you have to admit, it seems a little strange in Synthesis that Javik is still alive.  A guy with beliefs like his?  If he was in his right mind, he'd probably have commited suicide the moment he saw what had happened to him and everyone.


Being in one team with Shepard might teach Javik a lesson. He could change his mind about the suicide.

#3529
DirtyPhoenix

DirtyPhoenix
  • Members
  • 3 938 messages
Well, regardless, its just one appearance barely lasting seconds people draw all sorts of conclusions based on that. Its like arguing Traynor should jump on EDI in the memorial scene because she find her voice sexy. Or its unrealistic that Joker and EDI doesn't make out in the synthesis memorial scene. I mean just because people are known to behave in a certain way doesn't they will always behave that way regardless of the situation. Especially given the extremely small amount of time (3-4 seconds?) we actually see Javik in the EC.

#3530
Seival

Seival
  • Members
  • 5 294 messages
I created the thread we discussed recently:
http://social.biowar.../index/13527595

Some haters were noticed there, but looks like discussion goes on and has some very positive replies :)

Modifié par Seival, 05 août 2012 - 10:14 .


#3531
Seival

Seival
  • Members
  • 5 294 messages

pirate1802 wrote...

Well, regardless, its just one appearance barely lasting seconds people draw all sorts of conclusions based on that. Its like arguing Traynor should jump on EDI in the memorial scene because she find her voice sexy. Or its unrealistic that Joker and EDI doesn't make out in the synthesis memorial scene. I mean just because people are known to behave in a certain way doesn't they will always behave that way regardless of the situation. Especially given the extremely small amount of time (3-4 seconds?) we actually see Javik in the EC.


Javik could decide to spend the rest of his life searching for possible Prothean survivors all around the galaxy :)

#3532
Seival

Seival
  • Members
  • 5 294 messages

pirate1802 wrote...

Oh man.. wishful thinking. I really missed Harby. :/


Maybe the Leviathan and Harbinger will fight 1on1 in the DLC? I think that might happen during the "final run". Levi might damage Harbi or even kill it, but that will not stop Harbi from wounding Shepard.

#3533
Comsky159

Comsky159
  • Members
  • 1 093 messages
Is control the only ending that takes into account Shepard's personality (i.e. paragon/renegade), or do they all do that to an extent?

#3534
Hoz_Hun

Hoz_Hun
  • Members
  • 281 messages
I support Control Ending.

#3535
DirtyPhoenix

DirtyPhoenix
  • Members
  • 3 938 messages

Comsky159 wrote...

Is control the only ending that takes into account Shepard's personality (i.e. paragon/renegade), or do they all do that to an extent?


I'd love it if someone asnwers this. I assume since in control its Shepard him/herself narrating so your morality plays a bigger role. But it'd be awesome if all endings change slightly based on your alignent.

#3536
Archontor

Archontor
  • Members
  • 636 messages

Seival wrote...

pirate1802 wrote...

Oh man.. wishful thinking. I really missed Harby. :/


Maybe the Leviathan and Harbinger will fight 1on1 in the DLC? I think that might happen during the "final run". Levi might damage Harbi or even kill it, but that will not stop Harbi from wounding Shepard.


It was Pressley I think who confirmmed that the Leviathan DLC won't add much more than a line or too to the ending and won't be a significant change. I would call killing or wounding harbinger (or just pulling a Han Solo in general) a significant change no matter how much I agree that would help the ending.

#3537
DirtyPhoenix

DirtyPhoenix
  • Members
  • 3 938 messages

Archontor wrote...

Seival wrote...

pirate1802 wrote...

Oh man.. wishful thinking. I really missed Harby. :/


Maybe the Leviathan and Harbinger will fight 1on1 in the DLC? I think that might happen during the "final run". Levi might damage Harbi or even kill it, but that will not stop Harbi from wounding Shepard.


It was Pressley I think who confirmmed that the Leviathan DLC won't add much more than a line or too to the ending and won't be a significant change. I would call killing or wounding harbinger (or just pulling a Han Solo in general) a significant change no matter how much I agree that would help the ending.


but but but... It also could be Harbinger being dstracted by Levvy allowing Normandy to escape. That'd be insignificant enough. Anyway I thought the Normandy escape scene in EC was like a placeholder, you know.. how he stares emptily as the ship gets away. And Also, since the player can always select destroy and kill Levvy, my bets are it would be somehow dead already before the choice sequence. Killed by harby?

#3538
Seival

Seival
  • Members
  • 5 294 messages

Archontor wrote...

Seival wrote...

pirate1802 wrote...

Oh man.. wishful thinking. I really missed Harby. :/


Maybe the Leviathan and Harbinger will fight 1on1 in the DLC? I think that might happen during the "final run". Levi might damage Harbi or even kill it, but that will not stop Harbi from wounding Shepard.


It was Pressley I think who confirmmed that the Leviathan DLC won't add much more than a line or too to the ending and won't be a significant change. I would call killing or wounding harbinger (or just pulling a Han Solo in general) a significant change no matter how much I agree that would help the ending.


Well, I think if Shepard will be wounded in the end anyway, then Levi-vs-Harbi fight will not be a significant change. And that fight could be epic :)

#3539
Seival

Seival
  • Members
  • 5 294 messages

pirate1802 wrote...

Archontor wrote...

Seival wrote...

pirate1802 wrote...

Oh man.. wishful thinking. I really missed Harby. :/


Maybe the Leviathan and Harbinger will fight 1on1 in the DLC? I think that might happen during the "final run". Levi might damage Harbi or even kill it, but that will not stop Harbi from wounding Shepard.


It was Pressley I think who confirmmed that the Leviathan DLC won't add much more than a line or too to the ending and won't be a significant change. I would call killing or wounding harbinger (or just pulling a Han Solo in general) a significant change no matter how much I agree that would help the ending.


but but but... It also could be Harbinger being dstracted by Levvy allowing Normandy to escape. That'd be insignificant enough. Anyway I thought the Normandy escape scene in EC was like a placeholder, you know.. how he stares emptily as the ship gets away. And Also, since the player can always select destroy and kill Levvy, my bets are it would be somehow dead already before the choice sequence. Killed by harby?


Just imagine: Harbi have noticed the Normandy and is trying to destroy it, and keeps firing in Shepard's direction as well. Misses several times. Shepard got wounded by an explosion. And when she wakes up, she sees not a leaving Harbi, but Harbi-vs-Levi melee/laser fight on the background.

Modifié par Seival, 06 août 2012 - 04:02 .


#3540
Seival

Seival
  • Members
  • 5 294 messages

Comsky159 wrote...

Is control the only ending that takes into account Shepard's personality (i.e. paragon/renegade), or do they all do that to an extent?


Control is indeed the only ending which has different variants based on Shepard's personality.

Modifié par Seival, 06 août 2012 - 05:39 .


#3541
OdanUrr

OdanUrr
  • Members
  • 11 060 messages
You know what's funny? Control was my preferred ending before the EC. Now I'm not so sure. It reminds me of an excerpt I read in "The Truce at Bakura Sourcebook" where Luke Skywalker has a dream about being a "benign" Emperor. At first, the idea seems like a good one but then he realises it's unfeasible and that he's only deluding himself. Anyone remembers it?:?

#3542
Seival

Seival
  • Members
  • 5 294 messages

OdanUrr wrote...

You know what's funny? Control was my preferred ending before the EC. Now I'm not so sure. It reminds me of an excerpt I read in "The Truce at Bakura Sourcebook" where Luke Skywalker has a dream about being a "benign" Emperor. At first, the idea seems like a good one but then he realises it's unfeasible and that he's only deluding himself. Anyone remembers it?:?


Well, everything depends on your own Shepard. If you think she/he is ready, then everything will be ok. And if you don't wanna your Shepard to become a dictator, then you need Paragon Shepard instead of Renegade for Control Ending.

#3543
Seival

Seival
  • Members
  • 5 294 messages

RavenEyry wrote...

estebanus wrote...

Well, so much for diversity among the reapers. Really, why do they all look like cuttlefish?!

Because that's what they look like. They had to look like something.


I think it's a very nice form for a spaceship capable of landing planetside. What will Aliance dreadnought do after landing? Just lie on the ground, nothing more. But Reaper can walk. And I think two legs wouldn't be enough for that :)

Modifié par Seival, 06 août 2012 - 10:03 .


#3544
Seival

Seival
  • Members
  • 5 294 messages
...Besides, I think it's logical that Reapers look more like mechanical living beings, rather than spaceships.

#3545
CrutchCricket

CrutchCricket
  • Members
  • 7 747 messages
Reapers are constructing Reapers. So they make the new ones in their own image. Why is this a concern?

Besides ME2 seems to suggest the inner workings of a Reaper are made in the image of the species used to make it while the outershell is presumably the cuttlefish design. Organic inside, Reaper outside. It's symbolic to boot.

#3546
Seival

Seival
  • Members
  • 5 294 messages

CrutchCricket wrote...

Reapers are constructing Reapers. So they make the new ones in their own image. Why is this a concern?

Besides ME2 seems to suggest the inner workings of a Reaper are made in the image of the species used to make it while the outershell is presumably the cuttlefish design. Organic inside, Reaper outside. It's symbolic to boot.


Well, the Proto-Reaper could look almost the same way ("small" and human-like) after it would be finally constructed. According to EDI's intel, most Reapers have unique design.

#3547
Seival

Seival
  • Members
  • 5 294 messages
By the way, I hope BioWare will add more unique-looking reapers in future DLCs. At least as a part of final battle movies.

#3548
Seival

Seival
  • Members
  • 5 294 messages
...And other races' hasks will also be interesting. I think it will be nice if some of future DLCs could introduce Salarian, Elcor, Hanar, Vorcha, and Volus hasks. And maybe even Yahg hasks.

#3549
Ageless Face

Ageless Face
  • Members
  • 2 786 messages

Seival wrote...

By the way, I hope BioWare will add more unique-looking reapers in future DLCs. At least as a part of final battle movies.


Yeah, I hopes so too.





I WANT A FEMALE REAPER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

#3550
DirtyPhoenix

DirtyPhoenix
  • Members
  • 3 938 messages

Seival wrote...

I think it's a very nice form for a spaceship capable of landing planetside. What will Aliance dreadnought do after landing? Just lie on the ground, nothing more. But Reaper can walk. And I think two legs wouldn't be enough for that :)


Alliance dreadnoughts can't land planetside if I'm not wrong. They are constructed off-planet and must always remain so. Anybody confirm?