they are being torn a new one and falling back on straw men last time i was in there, using their own head cannon as fact and so on.o Ventus wrote...
davishepard wrote...
Makes sense, if he is meaning that the guys on the control thread will not attack this thread as the control one is being attacked. ^^o Ventus wrote...
That statement makes NO sense in correlation to mine, but ok then.
I stand corrected then.
I personally have no idea what's going on in that thread, as I haven't gone into it.
"We destroy them, or they destroy us" - Destroy Ending Support Thread.
Débuté par
MASSEFFECTfanforlife101
, mai 27 2012 07:04
#26
Posté 27 mai 2012 - 07:21
zovoes
-
- Members
- 445 messages
Retour en haut
#27
Posté 27 mai 2012 - 07:22
o Ventus
-
- Members
- 17 223 messages
Ji99saw wrote...
Ah yes, genocide and dooming future generations for a new cycle. I've completely written off that as the most stupid choice we have in ME3
Genocide about killing the geth, or killing the Reapers? If it's the latter, then I can't take you seriously.
"Dooming future generations for a new cycle"? You stopped the cycle by destroying the Reapers. Unless you were talking about the tech singularity (The one in which we have zero evidence supporting, but plenty of evidence to the contrary). Again, I can't take you seriously.
#28
Posté 27 mai 2012 - 07:22
KevTheGamer
-
- Members
- 1 172 messages
Send the Reapers back to hell where they belong!!!
#29
Posté 27 mai 2012 - 07:22
Vox Draco
-
- Members
- 2 939 messages
Destroy the Reapers and have Shepard survive - this is how you end a game-series as epic as this...
My latest video, supporting destroy all the way, whether literal or IT. it deosn't matter. Stay true to yourself, and don't let their lies deceive you, Shepard!
My latest video, supporting destroy all the way, whether literal or IT. it deosn't matter. Stay true to yourself, and don't let their lies deceive you, Shepard!
#30
Posté 27 mai 2012 - 07:24
dreamgazer
-
- Members
- 15 742 messages
davishepard wrote...
Makes sense, if he is meaning that the guys on the control thread will not attack this thread as the control one is being attacked. ^^
Eye-for-an-eye is an incredibly barbaric way of looking at discourse over ideas and theories, and the forum turns into a stagnant pool of acid as a result.
#31
Posté 27 mai 2012 - 07:25
RavenEyry
-
- Members
- 4 394 messages
How do you know it dooms future generations for a new cycle? And please don't say the shifty ghost told you so.Ji99saw wrote...
Ah yes, genocide and dooming future generations for a new cycle. I've completely written off that as the most stupid choice we have in ME3
#32
Posté 27 mai 2012 - 07:26
MASSEFFECTfanforlife101
-
- Members
- 8 311 messages
The geth, especially Legion, was willing to sacrifice himself to stop the Reapers at all cost. Even Edi Mentioned something, when she was acknowledging the fact that she has Reaper Tech, that if meant that she would sacrifice herself to stop the Reapers, so be it, or something similar, idk. So there is NO Genocide. EVERYONE in the Galaxy knew the risks in this War, and that there would be sacrifices, yet they fought on. Everyone was willing to do whatever it takes to stop the Reapers and end this nightmare forever. And everyone counts on YOU to put an end to the Reapers (Except the Bad Guys), so who are you to argue against what people believe in?
#33
Posté 27 mai 2012 - 07:26
CroGamer002
-
- Members
- 20 672 messages
MASSEFFECTfanforlife101 wrote...
Seival wrote...
I don't like Destroy ending, but I respect your opinion.
It's all good. No war intended.
Heh, this will never go like Colloector base debate.
Ah, the good ol' days.
Wait, those days sucked.
#34
Posté 27 mai 2012 - 07:28
CroGamer002
-
- Members
- 20 672 messages
MASSEFFECTfanforlife101 wrote...
The geth, especially Legion, was willing to sacrifice himself to stop the Reapers at all cost. Even Edi Mentioned something, when she was acknowledging the fact that she has Reaper Tech, that if meant that she would sacrifice herself to stop the Reapers, so be it, or something similar, idk. So there is NO Genocide. EVERYONE in the Galaxy knew the risks in this War, and that there would be sacrifices, yet they fought on. Everyone was willing to do whatever it takes to stop the Reapers and end this nightmare forever. And everyone counts on YOU to put an end to the Reapers (Except the Bad Guys), so who are you to argue against what people believe in?
There is still genocide, just that geth and EDI would be accepting it.
Though, we kinda don't ask them about that when activating Crucible.
#35
Posté 27 mai 2012 - 07:28
dreamgazer
-
- Members
- 15 742 messages
From this glorious artist over at DeviantArt:
http://suthnmeh.deviantart.com/
http://suthnmeh.deviantart.com/
Modifié par dreamgazer, 27 mai 2012 - 07:28 .
#36
Posté 27 mai 2012 - 07:29
Sohlito
-
- Members
- 624 messages
"We fight, or we die."
It's the best choice within the narrative of the Mass Effect universe.
It's the best choice within the narrative of the Mass Effect universe.
#37
Posté 27 mai 2012 - 07:30
mass perfection
-
- Members
- 2 253 messages
What benefits does Destroy offer that Synthesis or Control don't?Besides dead Reapers.
#38
Posté 27 mai 2012 - 07:30
Cadeym
-
- Members
- 466 messages
Mouseraider wrote...
Control:
1) The arrogance behind the thought that any one person knows what is best for everyone else... galactic dictatorship. Shepard could go bonkers and simply decide to continue the cycle.
2) TIM supports it.
Synthesis:
1) Galactic genocide.
2) This does not prevent the construction of synthetics, and the reapers are free to return or even continue their current cycle.
Destruction:
1) The death of all Geth or possibly everyone and everything.
2) The death of the Reapers who were under the control of the Catalyst. We still don't know whether or not they did any of it by their own free will.
I vote for a stay of execution... and demand that more information is provided before passing judgement.
#39
Posté 27 mai 2012 - 07:30
Luviagelita
-
- Members
- 108 messages
My only choice is Destroy.
Destroy is Determination. A choice of human who saw all the Reaper nightmare and doesen't believe in any other option.
Destroy is Determination. A choice of human who saw all the Reaper nightmare and doesen't believe in any other option.
#40
Posté 27 mai 2012 - 07:30
Shepard Wins
-
- Members
- 1 359 messages
dreamgazer wrote...
From this glorious artist over at DeviantArt:
http://suthnmeh.deviantart.com/
*snip*
Wow. This is amazing.
#41
Posté 27 mai 2012 - 07:31
MASSEFFECTfanforlife101
-
- Members
- 8 311 messages
dreamgazer wrote...
From this glorious artist over at DeviantArt:
http://suthnmeh.deviantart.com/
WOW! That's incredible!
#42
Posté 27 mai 2012 - 07:32
RavenEyry
-
- Members
- 4 394 messages
mass perfection wrote...
What benefits does Destroy offer that Synthesis or Control don't?Besides dead Reapers.
Not betraying everyone who ever trusted Shep.
#43
Posté 27 mai 2012 - 07:32
o Ventus
-
- Members
- 17 223 messages
mass perfection wrote...
What benefits does Destroy offer that Synthesis or Control don't?Besides dead Reapers.
Beside the total and complete (Also impossible) genetic rewrite of EVERYTHING in the galaxy?
Or the fact that neither Control nor Synthesis do ANYTHING to stop the singularity (Not that such an event has occurred, or is likely to occur. Also never mind that such an event is much more likely to be beneficial)?
#44
Posté 27 mai 2012 - 07:33
Jamie9
-
- Members
- 4 172 messages
My canon Shep picks Control but my 2nd Shep picks Destroy.
He knew machines could be broken. And broken they were.
He knew machines could be broken. And broken they were.
#45
Posté 27 mai 2012 - 07:33
MASSEFFECTfanforlife101
-
- Members
- 8 311 messages
[quote]Mouseraider wrote...
Control:
1) The arrogance behind the thought that any one person knows what is best for everyone else... galactic dictatorship. Shepard could go bonkers and simply decide to continue the cycle.
2) TIM supports it.
Synthesis:
1) Galactic genocide.
2) This does not prevent the construction of synthetics, and the reapers are free to return or even continue their current cycle.
Destruction:
1) The death of all Geth or possibly everyone and everything.
2) The death of the Reapers who were under the control of the Catalyst. We still don't know whether or not they did any of it by their own free will.
I vote for a stay of execution... and demand that more information is provided before passing judgement.[/quote][/quote]
With enough EMS, Destroy does not lead to Galactic Extiction, and all organics survive, including your LI and your own.
Control:
1) The arrogance behind the thought that any one person knows what is best for everyone else... galactic dictatorship. Shepard could go bonkers and simply decide to continue the cycle.
2) TIM supports it.
Synthesis:
1) Galactic genocide.
2) This does not prevent the construction of synthetics, and the reapers are free to return or even continue their current cycle.
Destruction:
1) The death of all Geth or possibly everyone and everything.
2) The death of the Reapers who were under the control of the Catalyst. We still don't know whether or not they did any of it by their own free will.
I vote for a stay of execution... and demand that more information is provided before passing judgement.[/quote][/quote]
With enough EMS, Destroy does not lead to Galactic Extiction, and all organics survive, including your LI and your own.
Modifié par MASSEFFECTfanforlife101, 27 mai 2012 - 07:37 .
#46
Posté 27 mai 2012 - 07:33
Ji99saw
-
- Members
- 227 messages
o Ventus wrote...
Ji99saw wrote...
Ah yes, genocide and dooming future generations for a new cycle. I've completely written off that as the most stupid choice we have in ME3
Genocide about killing the geth, or killing the Reapers? If it's the latter, then I can't take you seriously.
"Dooming future generations for a new cycle"? You stopped the cycle by destroying the Reapers. Unless you were talking about the tech singularity (The one in which we have zero evidence supporting, but plenty of evidence to the contrary). Again, I can't take you seriously.
I was talking about the Geth that your so proud to wipe out, And as far as I know the reapers are the oldest and strongest Machines in the galaxey so I don't see any reason for them to be deceptive considering they could turn every single organic in the galaxy into ash. Also we do have proof of what they say Geth Vs. Quarians just because there is tempoary peace for the sake of defeating the reapers doesn't mean that will always be the case. To some up Destroy- Commit Genocide To Prevent Genocide, does that sound familler?
#47
Posté 27 mai 2012 - 07:34
mass perfection
-
- Members
- 2 253 messages
Besides the Geth,EDI,and everyone who relies on technology to stay alive?Control doesn't harm anyone.Synthesis improves everyone.RavenEyry wrote...
mass perfection wrote...
What benefits does Destroy offer that Synthesis or Control don't?Besides dead Reapers.
Not betraying everyone who ever trusted Shep.
#48
Posté 27 mai 2012 - 07:35
Cadeym
-
- Members
- 466 messages
MASSEFFECTfanforlife101 wrote...
Mouseraider wrote...
Control:
1) The arrogance behind the thought that any one person knows what is best for everyone else... galactic dictatorship. Shepard could go bonkers and simply decide to continue the cycle.
2) TIM supports it.
Synthesis:
1) Galactic genocide.
2) This does not prevent the construction of synthetics, and the reapers are free to return or even continue their current cycle.
Destruction:
1) The death of all Geth or possibly everyone and everything.
2) The death of the Reapers who were under the control of the Catalyst. We still don't know whether or not they did any of it by their own free will.
I vote for a stay of execution... and demand that more information is provided before passing judgement.
Well I did include an "or" in there.With enough EMS, Destroy does not lead to Galactic Extiction, and all organics survive, including your LI and your own.
Modifié par Mouseraider, 27 mai 2012 - 07:36 .
#49
Posté 27 mai 2012 - 07:36
Luviagelita
-
- Members
- 108 messages
dreamgazer wrote...
From this glorious artist over at DeviantArt:
Oh yes, I saw this comic. Grasped all my feelings at Destroy.
I have to say that I don't care if my Shep lives or dies, I'd pick Destroy even if she'd be alive at Control. I hadn't a slightest doubt in my first playthrough and her survival was just a pleasant surprise.
#50
Posté 27 mai 2012 - 07:36
mass perfection
-
- Members
- 2 253 messages
Control doesn't do anything but to prevent the Synthetics to destroy us,we must merge with them.Synthesis makes that happen.o Ventus wrote...
mass perfection wrote...
What benefits does Destroy offer that Synthesis or Control don't?Besides dead Reapers.
Beside the total and complete (Also impossible) genetic rewrite of EVERYTHING in the galaxy?
Or the fact that neither Control nor Synthesis do ANYTHING to stop the singularity (Not that such an event has occurred, or is likely to occur. Also never mind that such an event is much more likely to be beneficial)?
