http://www.computera...ge=1#top_bannerI'm going to repost this from the other thread for those who didn't see it.
Quotes from the article
"The outcry over the ending seems excessive to me, but did it make
good science fiction?" he asks. "Well, was it good science? No. It was
pretty incomprehensible and didn't make much sense even within the
context of the game.
"But I'm actually a lot more interested in whether it made good
fiction. And the answer is 'no' again. Heavy exposition by a glowing
child never before mentioned seems a sure sign of failure."
"I think the problems started well before the ending," he explains. "The
Illusive Man went from fascinating power behind the throne in Mass
Effect 2 to tedious blathering villain in Mass Effect 3, for instance..... If the spike on the top of the skyscraper is wonky because the foundation is wonky, a new spike ain't going to fix it."
-Joe Abercrombie, author of the First Law trilogy
"My latest novel in the Pax Britannia series, Time's Arrow, is initially
being released in three parts as eBooks, and readers are able to vote
online for how they want the story to continue." When Time's Arrow is
finally printed it'll be a collaboration between author and reader, with
an ending the community helped decide before the novel was ever
finished."
"But there needs to be some form of emotional pay-off for all those
people who stuck with the over-arching story from day one. When it comes
to a huge game like Mass Effect 3, to have an ending which negates any
of the travails of the player is a mean-spirited and lazy thing to do."
Jonathan Green, Author in Star Wars Clone Wars series