Worst line from Shepard in the Mass Effect series?
#101
Posté 28 mai 2012 - 10:43
#102
Posté 28 mai 2012 - 10:45
WyntrKat wrote...
GenericEnemy wrote...
I'm probably going to get flamed for this, but every word that comes out of Shepard's mouth in the ME3 Ashley romance makes me cringe.
I feel pretty much the same about the Kaidan romance.
Eh, I thought Kaidan's actually seemed pretty genuine. Ashley's just felt like a Romeo and Juliet play I was in in High School.
#103
Posté 28 mai 2012 - 10:47
(monotone) "It's okay. C'MERE."
*cringe*
#104
Posté 28 mai 2012 - 10:57
TIMs plan before getting indoctrinated was to control the Reapers to get a second great advancement for humanity due to alien technology. TIM coming to that conclusion had nothing to do with being indoctrinated. It was the common sense observation that the advanced technology made incredible improvements. TIM becoming indoctrinated made him change from his goal to just being a pawn of the Reapers. This is a very simple "IF X, then Y" logical statement. If X, you can control the Reapers with the blue ending, then Y, the Illusive Man was right. Regardless of your hate for the catalyst, at the end of the blue ending, you command the Reapers to fall back and they do, so he was not lying and TIM was right.Sauruz wrote...
"So, TIM was right after all..."
"Nope, he was indoctrinated by those Reapers. But you can do it, maybe. Would this face lie to you?"
The whole Catalyst dialogue is idiotic. Within the scene itself, we are given no reason to believe the Reaper king anymore than TIM has reason to believe the Reapers who indoctrinated him. Both Shepard and TIM are made to believe that controlling the Reapers is possible by a Reaper or something that works closely together with the Reapers.
#105
Posté 28 mai 2012 - 11:06
There's still no reason to believe the Catalyst at the moment Shepard comes to that conlusion. What we see afterwards doesn't make the Catalyst dialogue any less stupid.silentassassin264 wrote...
TIMs plan before getting indoctrinated was to control the Reapers to get a second great advancement for humanity due to alien technology. TIM coming to that conclusion had nothing to do with being indoctrinated. It was the common sense observation that the advanced technology made incredible improvements. TIM becoming indoctrinated made him change from his goal to just being a pawn of the Reapers. This is a very simple "IF X, then Y" logical statement. If X, you can control the Reapers with the blue ending, then Y, the Illusive Man was right. Regardless of your hate for the catalyst, at the end of the blue ending, you command the Reapers to fall back and they do, so he was not lying and TIM was right.Sauruz wrote...
"So, TIM was right after all..."
"Nope, he was indoctrinated by those Reapers. But you can do it, maybe. Would this face lie to you?"
The whole Catalyst dialogue is idiotic. Within the scene itself, we are given no reason to believe the Reaper king anymore than TIM has reason to believe the Reapers who indoctrinated him. Both Shepard and TIM are made to believe that controlling the Reapers is possible by a Reaper or something that works closely together with the Reapers.
And what we see is pretty vague, anyway. We don't know how much control Shepard has over the Reapers exactly or if it's permanent.
#106
Posté 28 mai 2012 - 11:12
Jesus I still can't get over that line.
#107
Posté 28 mai 2012 - 11:14
#108
Posté 28 mai 2012 - 11:19
Its bad but I love it
#109
Posté 28 mai 2012 - 11:19
silentassassin264 wrote...
Enough with the Catalyst hate. There is reason to believe him A) if you don't do something the Reapers will wipe out your Allied Fleet and you lose andhe has no reason to help you in the first place. If you don't want to believe him, stand around the crucible until you get a nonstandard game over because the crucible gets shot down. You have no reason to believe Sovereign in ME1 on Virmire, you have no reason to believe EDI in ME2 when she just pulls out that Reapers are organic synthetic hybrids when nothing previous gave you any indication of that, and you have no reason to believe the catalyst either. It just is.
This sounds like a great discussion for a thread on whether to trust the Catalyst or not. Wlecome to the "Worst line from Shepard" thread which is not it.
#110
Posté 28 mai 2012 - 11:21
What an epic way to suck, Shepard.
Oh and anything she says on Earth. It's like she went retarded whenever she got near it.
#111
Posté 28 mai 2012 - 11:22
Not convinced.silentassassin264 wrote...
Enough with the Catalyst hate. There is reason to believe him A) if you don't do something the Reapers will wipe out your Allied Fleet and you lose andhe has no reason to help you in the first place. If you don't want to believe him, stand around the crucible until you get a nonstandard game over because the crucible gets shot down. You have no reason to believe Sovereign in ME1 on Virmire, you have no reason to believe EDI in ME2 when she just pulls out that Reapers are organic synthetic hybrids when nothing previous gave you any indication of that, and you have no reason to believe the catalyst either. It just is.
a) I'd rather take the chances with convential warfare before accepting the Catalyst's logic.
#112
Posté 28 mai 2012 - 11:25
Sauruz wrote...
Not convinced.silentassassin264 wrote...
Enough with the Catalyst hate. There is reason to believe him A) if you don't do something the Reapers will wipe out your Allied Fleet and you lose andhe has no reason to help you in the first place. If you don't want to believe him, stand around the crucible until you get a nonstandard game over because the crucible gets shot down. You have no reason to believe Sovereign in ME1 on Virmire, you have no reason to believe EDI in ME2 when she just pulls out that Reapers are organic synthetic hybrids when nothing previous gave you any indication of that, and you have no reason to believe the catalyst either. It just is.
a) I'd rather take the chances with convential warfare before accepting the Catalyst's logic.That's what makes his motivations nonsensical.
You don't have to accept the Catalyst's logic. Just shoot the tube and be done with it >.>
#113
Posté 28 mai 2012 - 11:26
Steveeeeeeee
I cringed when I heard that
#114
Posté 28 mai 2012 - 11:32
Zix13 wrote...
"We fight or we die"
"I.... Don't know"
"So TIM was right all along"
andd pretty much everything Shep said in the Sovereign dialogue
^This I concur
#115
Posté 28 mai 2012 - 11:32
comparing the first contact war to the genophage
"The only thing I care about is stopping Saren." -- Anderson's just finished telling you about his time as a Spectre candidate. This is your conversation closer.
"I won't sacrifice the soul of our species"
"I won't let fear compromise who I am."
"I thought we'd just talk for a bit." -- femShep to Jacob. -- this was the "Hey player this is your relationship in this game!!!!" hammer. It's the overly flirty way the line was delivered.
"I'll take it!!!!"
Modifié par sH0tgUn jUliA, 28 mai 2012 - 11:33 .
#116
Posté 28 mai 2012 - 11:34
It is kinda related. If the catalyst is right (which all signs point to it being correct) then claiming "Then the Illusive Man was right" to be one of the worse lines in the series is nonsensical.Whybother wrote...
silentassassin264 wrote...
Enough with the Catalyst hate. There is reason to believe him A) if you don't do something the Reapers will wipe out your Allied Fleet and you lose andhe has no reason to help you in the first place. If you don't want to believe him, stand around the crucible until you get a nonstandard game over because the crucible gets shot down. You have no reason to believe Sovereign in ME1 on Virmire, you have no reason to believe EDI in ME2 when she just pulls out that Reapers are organic synthetic hybrids when nothing previous gave you any indication of that, and you have no reason to believe the catalyst either. It just is.
This sounds like a great discussion for a thread on whether to trust the Catalyst or not. Wlecome to the "Worst line from Shepard" thread which is not it.
#117
Posté 28 mai 2012 - 11:34
MAYBE I DON'T WANT TO GO, MAYBE I WANT TO CONTINUE TALKING TO *Insert Squadmate Here*
#118
Posté 28 mai 2012 - 11:51
"Stealing from the dead. That's pretty low."
Oh the hypocrisy!
#119
Posté 28 mai 2012 - 11:52
Even though I didn't witness it personally in any of my playthroughs, having seen the Jacob reunion for FemSheps who romanced him in ME2 on youtube...the dialogue is awful. She can go from trying to nail him whilst he has a bullet wound on a doctors table...to calling him an a**hole.
Its like FemShep is briefly replaced by an alternate version of herself from a dimension filled with crazed bi-polar bunny boilers.
Modifié par NUM13ER, 28 mai 2012 - 11:54 .
#120
Posté 29 mai 2012 - 12:22
#121
Posté 29 mai 2012 - 12:26
And the very worse line is in fact the lack of wannabe heroic speech when talking to the catalyst.
#122
Posté 29 mai 2012 - 12:51
"You know you want this" (Or something like that)
I don't know...to me, that was kind of out in left field and lulz/wtf worthy
#123
Posté 29 mai 2012 - 01:01
catalyst
Edit:
just realized it was shepards line, so then
"STTTEEEVEEE"!!!!
you ok?
Modifié par FlamingBoy, 29 mai 2012 - 01:23 .
#124
Posté 29 mai 2012 - 01:16
Acturas wrote...
jstme wrote...
It is tie between "I.. don't know" - due to the context, and "Steeeeeeve!" due to stupidity.
Yep
sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...
"I thought we'd just talk for a bit." -- femShep to Jacob. -- this was the
"Hey player this is your relationship in this game!!!!" hammer. It's
the overly flirty way the line was delivered.
Modifié par rubynorman, 29 mai 2012 - 01:16 .
#125
Posté 29 mai 2012 - 01:17





Retour en haut






