Ce sujet est fermé
When does this topic proceed into phase 2 of it's lifespan? Phase 2 being Spiderman pictures.
Tali has been in just as many if not more suicide missions than Shepard over all three games.
Débuté par
Catamantaloedis
, mai 30 2012 01:11
Retour en haut
#302
Posté 30 mai 2012 - 04:51
Sisterofshane
-
- Members
- 1 756 messages
Dark_Caduceus wrote...
You own horses? Interesting.
Yes. He sees no problem in subjugating what he deems to be members of a lesser species.
Unless you're Tali and then apparently you are capable of single-handedly saving the galaxy, and winning his heart.<3
#303
Posté 30 mai 2012 - 04:52
Catamantaloedis
-
- Members
- 1 296 messages
Dark_Caduceus wrote...
You own horses? Interesting.
My family has bred championship pedigree horses for 5 generations.
#304
Posté 30 mai 2012 - 04:52
Dark_Caduceus
-
- Members
- 3 305 messages
Sisterofshane wrote...
Dark_Caduceus wrote...
You own horses? Interesting.
Yes. He sees no problem in subjugating what he deems to be members of a lesser species.
Unless you're Tali and then apparently you are capable of single-handedly saving the galaxy, and winning his heart.<3
I was suggesting it's interesting because people who have a vested interest in horses tend to be sexually stunted and unconsciously seeking representations of a phallus. But what you said is good too.
#305
Posté 30 mai 2012 - 04:53
Sisterofshane
-
- Members
- 1 756 messages
wsandista wrote...
Implies is a big word for a 5 year old.Catamantaloedis wrote...
wsandista wrote...
Catamantaloedis wrote...
Vorcha and Krogan are animals.
Hence the reason I offered my horses to you people.
Sorry, I don't want your sloppy seconds.
This implies you would have sex with horses.
He is using it wrong, anyways.
He didn't imply anything. Cat inferred.
#306
Posté 30 mai 2012 - 04:55
wsandista
-
- Members
- 2 723 messages
Dark_Caduceus wrote...
Sisterofshane wrote...
Dark_Caduceus wrote...
You own horses? Interesting.
Yes. He sees no problem in subjugating what he deems to be members of a lesser species.
Unless you're Tali and then apparently you are capable of single-handedly saving the galaxy, and winning his heart.<3
I was suggesting it's interesting because people who have a vested interest in horses tend to be sexually stunted and unconsciously seeking representations of a phallus. But what you said is good too.
*BROFIST
#307
Posté 30 mai 2012 - 04:55
balance5050
-
- Members
- 5 245 messages
Catamantaloedis wrote...
Dark_Caduceus wrote...
You own horses? Interesting.
My family has bred championship pedigree horses for 5 generations.
Oh I bet they have! 5 generations you say? That explains a lot.
Modifié par balance5050, 30 mai 2012 - 04:56 .
#308
Posté 30 mai 2012 - 04:56
Sisterofshane
-
- Members
- 1 756 messages
wsandista wrote...
Dark_Caduceus wrote...
Sisterofshane wrote...
Dark_Caduceus wrote...
You own horses? Interesting.
Yes. He sees no problem in subjugating what he deems to be members of a lesser species.
Unless you're Tali and then apparently you are capable of single-handedly saving the galaxy, and winning his heart.<3
I was suggesting it's interesting because people who have a vested interest in horses tend to be sexually stunted and unconsciously seeking representations of a phallus. But what you said is good too.
*BROFIST
Wish I was a bro.
But go ahead you two, eat your heart out! Brofist away!
#309
Posté 30 mai 2012 - 04:57
Catamantaloedis
-
- Members
- 1 296 messages
I didn't use imply incorrectly at all.
It can be inferred FROM his statement that he would have sex with horses. However then statement itself does, in fact, imply that he would engage in sexual intercourse with a horse.
It can be inferred FROM his statement that he would have sex with horses. However then statement itself does, in fact, imply that he would engage in sexual intercourse with a horse.
#310
Posté 30 mai 2012 - 04:57
ediskrad327
-
- Members
- 4 031 messages
best OP he's ever doneCatamantaloedis wrote...
#311
Posté 30 mai 2012 - 04:58
Dark_Caduceus
-
- Members
- 3 305 messages
Catamantaloedis wrote...
I didn't use imply incorrectly at all.
It can be inferred FROM his statement that he would have sex with horses. However then statement itself does, in fact, imply that he would engage in sexual intercourse with a horse.
So... you wanna **** a horse?
#312
Posté 30 mai 2012 - 04:58
Sisterofshane
-
- Members
- 1 756 messages
Catamantaloedis wrote...
I didn't use imply incorrectly at all.
It can be inferred FROM his statement that he would have sex with horses. However then statement itself does, in fact, imply that he would engage in sexual intercourse with a horse.
Yes, you did.
He implied with his statement that YOU engage in questionable equestrian activities. You then INFERRED that he did as well.
One requires intent, the other does not.
#313
Posté 30 mai 2012 - 04:59
Dark_Caduceus
-
- Members
- 3 305 messages
Sisterofshane wrote...
Catamantaloedis wrote...
I didn't use imply incorrectly at all.
It can be inferred FROM his statement that he would have sex with horses. However then statement itself does, in fact, imply that he would engage in sexual intercourse with a horse.
Yes, you did.
He implied with his statement that YOU engage in questionable equestrian activities. You then INFERRED that he did as well.
One requires intent, the other does not.
Yup.
#314
Posté 30 mai 2012 - 04:59
wsandista
-
- Members
- 2 723 messages
Catamantaloedis wrote...
I didn't use imply incorrectly at all.
It can be inferred FROM his statement that he would have sex with horses. However then statement itself does, in fact, imply that he would engage in sexual intercourse with a horse.
You used imply improperly.
I implied that you engage in sexual intercourse with your horses.
You inferred I have sex with horses.
maybe when you get into 2nd grade you will learn the difference.
#315
Posté 30 mai 2012 - 04:59
wsandista
-
- Members
- 2 723 messages
Sisterofshane wrote...
wsandista wrote...
Dark_Caduceus wrote...
Sisterofshane wrote...
Dark_Caduceus wrote...
You own horses? Interesting.
Yes. He sees no problem in subjugating what he deems to be members of a lesser species.
Unless you're Tali and then apparently you are capable of single-handedly saving the galaxy, and winning his heart.<3
I was suggesting it's interesting because people who have a vested interest in horses tend to be sexually stunted and unconsciously seeking representations of a phallus. But what you said is good too.
*BROFIST
Wish I was a bro.
But go ahead you two, eat your heart out! Brofist away!
Do a sisfist
#316
Posté 30 mai 2012 - 05:00
Seboist
-
- Members
- 11 989 messages
Sisterofshane wrote...
Seboist wrote...
The best suicide mission Tali participated in my game was the Rannoch one.
Ah, Sebo. This is the you that I have missed!
Pertinent and satiristic one-liners!<3
The bomb that's ME3 didn't kill my Seboisms.
#317
Posté 30 mai 2012 - 05:00
Sisterofshane
-
- Members
- 1 756 messages
wsandista wrote...
Do a sisfist
I'm thinkin' that I'm the only "Sis" in this thread...
Modifié par Sisterofshane, 30 mai 2012 - 05:02 .
#318
Posté 30 mai 2012 - 05:01
Catamantaloedis
-
- Members
- 1 296 messages
His statement implies that he would have sex with a horse because he said that he did not want my "sloppy seconds". The implication being that he would have sex with one of my horses if it was a virgin.Sisterofshane wrote...
Catamantaloedis wrote...
I didn't use imply incorrectly at all.
It can be inferred FROM his statement that he would have sex with horses. However then statement itself does, in fact, imply that he would engage in sexual intercourse with a horse.
Yes, you did.
He implied with his statement that YOU engage in questionable equestrian activities. You then INFERRED that he did as well.
One requires intent, the other does not.
#319
Posté 30 mai 2012 - 05:02
arial
-
- Members
- 5 811 messages
omg this thread is till going?!?
congrats, youve won the Troll of the year award, and a sandwich
congrats, youve won the Troll of the year award, and a sandwich
#320
Posté 30 mai 2012 - 05:02
wsandista
-
- Members
- 2 723 messages
Catamantaloedis wrote...
His statement implies that he would have sex with a horse because he said that he did not want my "sloppy seconds". The implication being that he would have sex with one of my horses if it was a virgin.Sisterofshane wrote...
Catamantaloedis wrote...
I didn't use imply incorrectly at all.
It can be inferred FROM his statement that he would have sex with horses. However then statement itself does, in fact, imply that he would engage in sexual intercourse with a horse.
Yes, you did.
He implied with his statement that YOU engage in questionable equestrian activities. You then INFERRED that he did as well.
One requires intent, the other does not.
Actually the implication was that you have already had sex with your horse and I do not wish to do the same.
Modifié par wsandista, 30 mai 2012 - 05:02 .
#321
Posté 30 mai 2012 - 05:03
Dark_Caduceus
-
- Members
- 3 305 messages
Catamantaloedis wrote...
His statement implies that he would have sex with a horse because he said that he did not want my "sloppy seconds". The implication being that he would have sex with one of my horses if it was a virgin.Sisterofshane wrote...
Catamantaloedis wrote...
I didn't use imply incorrectly at all.
It can be inferred FROM his statement that he would have sex with horses. However then statement itself does, in fact, imply that he would engage in sexual intercourse with a horse.
Yes, you did.
He implied with his statement that YOU engage in questionable equestrian activities. You then INFERRED that he did as well.
One requires intent, the other does not.
If somebody says "I don't want your pizza left-overs" does that
immediately imply that they would have the pizza assuming you hadn't
eaten some of it first?
#322
Posté 30 mai 2012 - 05:03
Catamantaloedis
-
- Members
- 1 296 messages
You said that you didn't want my horse because it was a sloppy second. This statement implies that if it was not a sloppy second, you would want the horse.
#323
Posté 30 mai 2012 - 05:03
Dark_Caduceus
-
- Members
- 3 305 messages
arial wrote...
omg this thread is till going?!?
congrats, youve won the Troll of the year award, and a sandwich
He is actually a pretty good troll; but it's fun to play along.
Modifié par Dark_Caduceus, 30 mai 2012 - 05:04 .
#325
Posté 30 mai 2012 - 05:04
Dark_Caduceus
-
- Members
- 3 305 messages
Catamantaloedis wrote...
You said that you didn't want my horse because it was a sloppy second. This statement implies that if it was not a sloppy second, you would want the horse.
Nope, it actually doesn't. I told you; don't argue semantics if you're trolling.
