Modifié par Erebusd13, 11 décembre 2009 - 06:15 .
The Mass Effect team must not be nearly as interesting.Few87 wrote...
The bioware responses on these forums always seem a little abrupt and aggressive, the bioware staff on the mass effect forums seem a lot more freindly....
I think it's more that people have no sense of humor anymore and expect deadpan responses from developers instead of having developers who are willing to joke with their players.Few87 wrote...
The bioware responses on these forums always seem a little abrupt and aggressive, the bioware staff on the mass effect forums seem a lot more freindly....
Mordaedil wrote...
I think it's more that people have no sense of humor anymore and expect deadpan responses from developers instead of having developers who are willing to joke with their players.Few87 wrote...
The bioware responses on these forums always seem a little abrupt and aggressive, the bioware staff on the mass effect forums seem a lot more freindly....
Oh, by the way. The developers of Mass Effect will do the same thing when the game gets released. They will make fun of you. And you will like it.
Modifié par Taleroth, 11 décembre 2009 - 06:46 .
Dreogan wrote...
They're buried in the Haven graveyard, next to horses and multiplayer.
David Gaider wrote...
Wow. So... you mean that some people really like cloaks?DragonAgeNeedsCapesOrCloaks wrote...
i posted this in an attempt to get responses and maybe support from those who may agree with me so hopefully in a perfect world bioware will get the idea and put them in the game.
We had no idea.
Thank you so much for bringing this to our attention. If we had only known that there were people out there who think cloaks are neat, we might have added them onto the pile sooner. Our bad.
thegreateski wrote...
Dreogan wrote...
They're buried in the Haven graveyard, next to horses and multiplayer.
And swimming.
Mr. Gaider, I think I love you. In a completely heterosexual way, of course.David Gaider wrote...
Wow. So... you mean that some people really like cloaks?DragonAgeNeedsCapesOrCloaks wrote...
i posted this in an attempt to get responses and maybe support from those who may agree with me so hopefully in a perfect world bioware will get the idea and put them in the game.
We had no idea.
Thank you so much for bringing this to our attention. If we had only known that there were people out there who think cloaks are neat, we might have added them onto the pile sooner. Our bad.
David Gaider wrote...
Wow. So... you mean that some people really like cloaks?DragonAgeNeedsCapesOrCloaks wrote...
i posted this in an attempt to get responses and maybe support from those who may agree with me so hopefully in a perfect world bioware will get the idea and put them in the game.
We had no idea.
Thank you so much for bringing this to our attention. If we had only known that there were people out there who think cloaks are neat, we might have added them onto the pile sooner. Our bad.
q0rra wrote...
Mr. Gaider, I think I love you. In a completely heterosexual way, of course.David Gaider wrote...
Wow. So... you mean that some people really like cloaks?DragonAgeNeedsCapesOrCloaks wrote...
i posted this in an attempt to get responses and maybe support from those who may agree with me so hopefully in a perfect world bioware will get the idea and put them in the game.
We had no idea.
Thank you so much for bringing this to our attention. If we had only known that there were people out there who think cloaks are neat, we might have added them onto the pile sooner. Our bad.
(can't read mine, can't read mine, no he can't read my cloaked face!)
Few87 wrote...
The bioware responses on these forums always seem a little abrupt and aggressive, the bioware staff on the mass effect forums seem a lot more freindly....
Murphys_Law wrote...
Few87 wrote...
The bioware responses on these forums always seem a little abrupt and aggressive, the bioware staff on the mass effect forums seem a lot more freindly....
"Friendly" responses tend to be PR-approved canned messages that contain little information and are almost universally boring. American consumers need to get off their high horse a little bit and stop expecting to be treated as gods just because they fork over a couple of bucks. Frankly, I don't find David's sarcastic comment mean in any way. Especially, when the thread is started with a all caps title and a username clearly created for attention. Not to mention, having a low understanding of how much work it takes to make cloaks look good (hello clipping) and not presenting a lot of good arguments on why cloaks are needed. The funny thing is I agree with him/her completely and yet I didn't see David's post as unfriendly because it shows more of the "other side" and was also slightly amusing (I am a sucker for sarcasm). Please do not ever encourage/petition the developers of any game to be more "friendly", the last thing I want is more c/p bull**** develper responses.
'
There were no put downs. If I wanted to be mean I would have said that anyone who honestly believes that we developers don't know that RPG fans like the idea of cloaks, and that this is the reason we didn't have them in DAO, is being foolishly naive. I would also have said that anyone who takes offense on someone else's behalf regarding a snarky response to be a hyper-sensitive wackadoodle.Few87 wrote...
First of all im not an american im English and im just saying it would be much nicer if they would be more polite. There isnt any need for their sarky put downs, it is mean and uncalled for.
David Gaider wrote...
There were no put downs. If I wanted to be mean I would have said that anyone who honestly believes that we developers don't know that RPG fans like the idea of cloaks, and that this is the reason we didn't have them in DAO, is being foolishly naive. I would also have said that anyone who takes offense on someone else's behalf regarding a snarky response to be a hyper-sensitive wackadoodle.Few87 wrote...
First of all im not an american im English and im just saying it would be much nicer if they would be more polite. There isnt any need for their sarky put downs, it is mean and uncalled for.
But I would never say such things. Because I am not mean.
)
The cloak slot is there because, at one time, we had cloaks. They were never actually made, but there was a plan for them -- and if I remember right, when they were cut there was initially a plan to keep them as items which simply didn't show up on your character (hence the "hidden" nature, perhaps?). That didn't last long, and perhaps the slot was never removed entirely on the hopes that we would one day be able to add it back in. Ideally, we'd like to have it. Done correctly, they would probably look pretty cool... but there's the rub, no?BanditGR wrote...
So, purely out of curiosity, was it time constraints, a technical issue or perhaps a balancing issue, that made you guys hide the cloak slot ? It's not much of a big deal anyway (and I'm willing to wager not much of a "secret" either
David Gaider wrote...
There were no put downs. If I wanted to be mean I would have said that anyone who honestly believes that we developers don't know that RPG fans like the idea of cloaks, and that this is the reason we didn't have them in DAO, is being foolishly naive. I would also have said that anyone who takes offense on someone else's behalf regarding a snarky response to be a hyper-sensitive wackadoodle.Few87 wrote...
First of all im not an american im English and im just saying it would be much nicer if they would be more polite. There isnt any need for their sarky put downs, it is mean and uncalled for.
But I would never say such things. Because I am not mean.
Retour en haut
