Aller au contenu

Photo

WHERE ARE THE CLOAKS


464 réponses à ce sujet

#101
BanditGR

BanditGR
  • Members
  • 757 messages
Fair enough. Thanks for the clarification Dave.

#102
Taleroth

Taleroth
  • Members
  • 9 136 messages
Personally, I take concern with the word "wackadoodle." Lacks oomf.

#103
addiction21

addiction21
  • Members
  • 6 066 messages

RageGT wrote...

thegreateski wrote...

Dreogan wrote...

They're buried in the Haven graveyard, next to horses and multiplayer.


And swimming.


And jumping...
Over the fences or to a river of lava.... why can XXXXX or XXXXX do it and we cannot? I have suicidal tendencies!  *search for a cloack to hide*

And I love when devs become just regular persons with humor and all, instead of untouchable superhumans rockstars!


While were at it lets get some rock climbing and maybe a marathon mini game for the loading screens. It could show off the new nifty cloaks coming soon...

and waffles, always waffles

DragonAgeNeedsCapesOrCloaks wrote...

How ridiculous is it that this is a fantasy RPG



When were cloaks ever included in the definition of any of those words you just said?

Modifié par addiction21, 11 décembre 2009 - 10:27 .


#104
Adria Teksuni

Adria Teksuni
  • Members
  • 829 messages

David Gaider wrote...
There were no put downs. If I wanted to be mean I would have said that anyone who honestly believes that we developers don't know that RPG fans like the idea of cloaks, and that this is the reason we didn't have them in DAO, is being foolishly naive. I would also have said that anyone who takes offense on someone else's behalf regarding a snarky response to be a hyper-sensitive wackadoodle.

But I would never say such things. Because I am not mean. Image IPB


I am offended that they are offended that you possibly offended someone for making a wackadoodle-offensive post.

Rediscovered wordage!  I r happy.

#105
SheffSteel

SheffSteel
  • Members
  • 1 231 messages
I'm susprised no one mentioned the many good reasons why capes and cloaks are a bad idea that were explained very nicely and clearly here: www.youtube.com/watch

The truth is, there are so many other things the team could work on that would be more cost-effective, e.g. enchanted codpieces. Image IPB

#106
Adria Teksuni

Adria Teksuni
  • Members
  • 829 messages
*facedesk*



Sheffsteel beat me to it by this much!

#107
SheffSteel

SheffSteel
  • Members
  • 1 231 messages

Adria Teksuni wrote...

*facedesk*

Sheffsteel beat me to it by this much!


Sorry, my patent application for enchanted codpieces has been filed already.
Enchantment!Image IPB

#108
Adria Teksuni

Adria Teksuni
  • Members
  • 829 messages
lol, I was referring to the NO CAPES bit, but...



Curse you!

#109
Taleroth

Taleroth
  • Members
  • 9 136 messages
I'd rather die with a stylish cape!

#110
Adria Teksuni

Adria Teksuni
  • Members
  • 829 messages
It is better to look good than to feel good, my friend.

Let's just see how old some of these professed old farts are.  Bonus points for recognition of quote with no Googleage.

Modifié par Adria Teksuni, 11 décembre 2009 - 10:49 .


#111
Taleroth

Taleroth
  • Members
  • 9 136 messages
I fail. Had to google.

#112
DragonRageGT

DragonRageGT
  • Members
  • 6 070 messages

SheffSteel wrote...

I'm susprised no one mentioned the many good reasons why capes and cloaks are a bad idea that were explained very nicely and clearly here: www.youtube.com/watch

The truth is, there are so many other things the team could work on that would be more cost-effective, e.g. enchanted codpieces. Image IPB


That could as easily be countered by this!



#113
Adria Teksuni

Adria Teksuni
  • Members
  • 829 messages
So not only do we have to have magic invisibility cloaks, but they have to let us fly? O.o

#114
Trajan60

Trajan60
  • Members
  • 592 messages
cloaks would just cover up more of Morrigan's body. not good.

#115
MonkeyLungs

MonkeyLungs
  • Members
  • 1 912 messages

illidoth123 wrote...

I want my bow to bend when i pull my arrow back DAMNIT


You don't even have a bowstring to cause it to bend. no bow string, no bendy! They solved two problems in one by leaving out the string.

#116
DragonRageGT

DragonRageGT
  • Members
  • 6 070 messages

Adria Teksuni wrote...

So not only do we have to have magic invisibility cloaks, but they have to let us fly? O.o


Wouldn't that be nice? We used to have griffons, you know... I mean... old time Wardens! =}


Trajan60 wrote...

cloaks would just cover up more of Morrigan's body. not good.


On the other hand, you're so right! Is there a  "No Cloak, Less Clothes" petition anywhere for me to sign? =}}

#117
Malal Belakor

Malal Belakor
  • Members
  • 44 messages

Taleroth wrote...

Don't upset Gaider. He might write more Morrigan endings.


you are my hero Image IPB

#118
Killian Kalthorne

Killian Kalthorne
  • Members
  • 640 messages
You know, wearing a cloak is a bad idea for heroes. I view them the same as I do capes. Capes are a bad idea. Anyone who has watched "The Incredibles" would know that.

#119
Malal Belakor

Malal Belakor
  • Members
  • 44 messages

Trajan60 wrote...

cloaks would just cover up more of Morrigan's body. not good.


at dragon age nexus, the second and the third more downloaded mods are nude patches

#120
ToJKa1

ToJKa1
  • Members
  • 1 246 messages

Few87 wrote...

First of all im not an american im English and im just saying it would be much nicer if they would be more polite. There isnt any need for their sarky put downs, it is mean and uncalled for.


You should visit the forums of stardocks games, the CEO isn't afraid to let whiners know he doesn't want them as customers. The benefit of not having stockholders, i suppose ^_^

On topic, cloaks and capes would be nice if they looked nice, and since they wouldn't they aren't.

#121
ModForFun

ModForFun
  • Members
  • 65 messages

Rainen89 wrote...
a cloak is a piece of clothing. It's not magical, it doesn't make you sneaky and it doesn't do anything except keep you warm in the winter.


Neither is Armor yet in DA we see enough of it with enchantments on it, same goes for the weaponry and belts and rings and so on and so on and so on. Your arguments fairly lame considering that magic in the form of enchantment exists in DA's world and much of that magic and the lore behind it suggests otherwise.

I do agree though that there are far better things that Bioware could be doing then adding cloaks to DA.

#122
Malal Belakor

Malal Belakor
  • Members
  • 44 messages
work for another location (for example) >>>far better>>> work for a good cape

#123
Murphys_Law

Murphys_Law
  • Members
  • 113 messages

Few87 wrote...

Murphys_Law wrote...

Few87 wrote...

The bioware responses on these forums always seem a little abrupt and aggressive, the bioware staff on the mass effect forums seem a lot more freindly....


"Friendly" responses tend to be PR-approved canned messages that contain little information and are almost universally boring.  American consumers need to get off their high horse a little bit and stop expecting to be treated as gods just because they fork over a couple of bucks.  Frankly, I don't find David's sarcastic comment mean in any way.  Especially, when the thread is started with a all caps title and a username clearly created for attention.  Not to mention, having a low understanding of how much work it takes to make cloaks look good (hello clipping) and not presenting a lot of good arguments on why cloaks are needed.  The funny thing is I agree with him/her completely and yet I didn't see David's post as unfriendly because it shows more of the "other side" and was also slightly amusing (I am a sucker for sarcasm).  Please do not ever encourage/petition the developers of any game to be more "friendly", the last thing I want is more c/p bull**** develper responses.
'


First of all im not an american im English and im just saying it would be much nicer if they would be more polite. There isnt any need for their sarky put downs, it is mean and uncalled for.


I wasn't talking specifically to you.  I made it pretty clear that was a general statement on American consumers and the problems with telling the developers or a company to be more "polite".  This is especially true when someone views sarcasm as a "put down".  People are not robots, we don't all communcate in the same way.  We should always support when developers "let their hair down" as it were, unless there is outright name calling and personal attacks.  That is one thing I have apperciated about this forum and the old one is that the developers seem to give straight honest answers that do not always go through the corporate PR filter.  That is rare in this day in age, we seem to have lost the ability to just have straight communication between the costumers and the people who make/provide the product/service we pay for.  Be careful what you wish for when you ask developers to be more "polite".

#124
Bibdy

Bibdy
  • Members
  • 1 455 messages

David Gaider wrote...

Sure, but the premise behind the thread (apparently) was "we want cloaks, and maybe if we say so the developers will realize it and add them." To which my response is "duh". We already know that players like cloaks. They want MOAR -- cloaks, scabbards, bowstrings, spears, longer hair, pretty dresses, halberds, horses, bigger boobs, smaller boobs, whiter teeth and a slider in everyone's stocking at Christmas... I mean, do you really think the reason we don't add most of these things is simply because we don't know that people want them?

I love cloaks. I think cloaks are awesome. I hope we get to add them at some point.


FINALLY. A game dev comes out and calls people out on their ... hmm, how to put this lightly ... ah, yes ... their bothersome unreasonableness.

#125
Vicious

Vicious
  • Members
  • 3 221 messages

They want MOAR -- cloaks, scabbards, bowstrings, spears, longer hair, pretty dresses, halberds, horses, bigger boobs, smaller boobs, whiter teeth and a slider in everyone's stocking at Christmas...


I want all of that for DA2.

MOAR PLZ.

Modifié par Vicious, 12 décembre 2009 - 01:57 .