FamilyManFirst wrote...
There's also nothing saying that a non-stinky alternative will be found be found eventually, either. In fact, there's absolutely no support for such an idea in the game. As such, this is wishful thinking. Believe it if you want, but don't ask anybody else to; they have no reason to.
I never asked anyone else to. I am just saying, the existence of the mass relays proves that you can exceed normal FTL. It's only a matter of figuring out how it works.
What I do question is people's . . . let's say, "emotionally charged response" to the ending, to the point where they think that Buzz Aldrian is wearing a grass skirt and clutching a spear in that ending, or that the Normandy crashed on Alia and now they're all going to die and become stupid because Bioware hates you and wanted to screw you. If Bioware wanted to do that, they'd have made one ending where everyone dies.
The truth is, they just didn't pull off a satisfying ending, like many trilogies before them. You don't need to
invent reasons to find the ending unsatisfying.
It's all well and good to say, "The Mass Relays are inherently evil, as they were put in place by the Reapers to stunt our growth! It's good that they were destroyed!" However, you get to explain that to the men, women, and children who are starving because they can no longer get the food they need to survive through the now-defunct Mass Relays.
The thing is, those people are not starving because someone chose to destroy the mass relays. They're starving because nobody ever thought "hey, maybe we should find out how to build a mass relay, in case something happens to the one this system has."
Assuming anyone actually is starving. I'm still not sold on the idea that the fleet at the end has more people than can be supported by this entire region of Outer Space, or that isolated colonies exist that weren't abandoned or picked off by the Reapers or Cerberus.