1051 réponses à ce sujet

[android654]

I'm telling you, Both Sony and Microsoft aren't done with all the money they can get out of this gen. Keeping that in mind, what they said and that they only confirmed next gen game is due out in 2015, you wont see anything until E3 2014 and we'll probably get it that holiday season.

[Sajji]

I'm ready for new hardware.

I'm looking at Nintendo in the mind of a shopper right now.

[Sajji]

Especially if the rumor is true and a sequel to Eternal Darkness: Sanity's Requiem is in the works

[Elhanan]

Rockworm503 wrote...

Haters gonna hate right?

tsk; tsk; promises, promises....

[Tazzmission]

$99 Xbox 360 deal expanding to Gamestop and Best Buy


http://news.yahoo.co...-221551319.html

[android654]

It's on it's last legs, no doubt, but look at the pattern when switching from the original and the PS2 to the 360 and PS3. They even announced an Assassin's Creed PS3 bundle at E3, both sides are tight lipped, and they still need to gauge the reactions to the WiiU to see what technology they need to work on to appeal to that market.

[Jvolikas]

My quick thoughts about E3:

For the 360, I was impressed with the Halo 4 and Splinter Cell footage but thats it.  Kinect and Smart Glass dont interest me (ESPN will be cool though) and I really think next year we'll hear about the 720 for a 2014 release.  I wasnt really expecting much out of E3 so 2 good-looking games is acceptable with me although I wish there had been news of a new IP.

But Nintendo, such a disappointent.  They HAD the conference this year since everybody wanted to hear more details about Wii U.  Instead we get a few game previews, NO PRICE AND NO CONFIRMED RELEASE DATE?!?!  What a letdown.

[Rockworm503]

I watched the Splinter Cell gameplay footage and its more painful to watch than I expected.
When I think stealth gameplay I think YOU are screwed if you're spotted. Fisher running around having shootouts and killing everyone in his path is not what i remember playing SC.
That is just stupid. Sure it looks like choice is the new stealth but we got plenty of games that offer choice. I sure like a game that lets me change my tactics should my original plan falls short but that is NOT what SC is about. It should be mission failed as soon as those guys started shooting at him. I thought this was third echelon... supposed to deny their involvement not CTU where Jack Bauer kills everyone to stop the bad guys.
UGH that is the most disappointing thing thats come out of E3 bar none.

[The Love Runner]

Can't wait to hear more about Playstation All-Stars Battle Royale. I saw that they announced Nathan Drake and Big Daddy. I would totally love Solid Snake and Crash Bandicoot (in his Naughty Dog days) to be announced next.

I'm also keeping an eye on Star Wars 1313. I was expecting Star Wars: The Force Unleashed III to be announced, but another bounty hunter game, if done right, would be cool.

Dishonored sounds cool, and I'm definitely checking out God of War: Ascension. Also checking out Tekken Tag Tournament 2 and Assassin's Creed III.

[Addai]

AlanC9 wrote...

I can't help but think that the NWN model is going to be the future of gaming. Keep the art assets and maybe sounds on the client, but pass the rest of the content down from the servers.

I work in data storage, and I can tell you that the people who are still talking about how wonderful the cloud is don't have a clue.  This is mostly due to data loss which won't be as big a deal for games as, say, for a bank, but Diablo III is a preview of how much can go wrong when you have to pass game data through several handshakes and hope somebody's home down at the server farm.  We're now used to high speed internet, but what happens when more and more users are on the web, doing more and more high-volume things... it's going to be harder, not easier, to rely on being online.

[Rockworm503]

jreezy wrote...

Rockworm503 wrote...
I watched the Splinter Cell gameplay footage and its more painful to watch than I expected...

I thought this was third echelon... supposed to deny their involvement not CTU where Jack Bauer kills everyone to stop the bad guys.

It's actually Fourth Echelon now, which Sam is in charge of.

Well isn't plausible deniability the entire premise?  Or is Fisher saying F that  LOLOL I want to kill the bad guys?

[Chromie]

android654 wrote...

It's on it's last legs, no doubt, but look at the pattern when switching from the original and the PS2 to the 360 and PS3. They even announced an Assassin's Creed PS3 bundle at E3, both sides are tight lipped, and they still need to gauge the reactions to the WiiU to see what technology they need to work on to appeal to that market.

I feel like they are waiting for the WiiU to launch and then plan to emulate anything they don't have. I have to admit the ingame message boards (or w/e) seems very useful when stuck in a game and the Mario Bros. U has ingame messages from friends which can also be turned off. I wouldn't be surprised to see Sony and Microsoft try something like that after all Smart Glass = WiiU gamepad.

[android654]

Skelter192 wrote...

android654 wrote...

It's on it's last legs, no doubt, but look at the pattern when switching from the original and the PS2 to the 360 and PS3. They even announced an Assassin's Creed PS3 bundle at E3, both sides are tight lipped, and they still need to gauge the reactions to the WiiU to see what technology they need to work on to appeal to that market.

I feel like they are waiting for the WiiU to launch and then plan to emulate anything they don't have. I have to admit the ingame message boards (or w/e) seems very useful when stuck in a game and the Mario Bros. U has ingame messages from friends which can also be turned off. I wouldn't be surprised to see Sony and Microsoft try something like that after all Smart Glass = WiiU gamepad.

It was obvious that Microsoft was copying off of Nintendo's paper when they announced their smart glass. People love gimmicky stuff like that. Anyone who denies this needs to look at the success of the Wii Fit and the respone from both Sony and Microsoft by making  Move and Kinect. It makes money to follow what Nintendo does so they're going to gauge it then apply it in a half-assed way. It only works for Nintendo because they have broader appeal, while the "hardcore" gamers on the PS3 and 360 could care less about it.

[Rockworm503]

jreezy wrote...

Rockworm503 wrote...

jreezy wrote...

Rockworm503 wrote...
I watched the Splinter Cell gameplay footage and its more painful to watch than I expected...

I thought this was third echelon... supposed to deny their involvement not CTU where Jack Bauer kills everyone to stop the bad guys.

It's actually Fourth Echelon now, which Sam is in charge of.

Well isn't plausible deniability the entire premise?  Or is Fisher saying F that  LOLOL I want to kill the bad guys?

I sure hope Sam isn't pew pew crazy and just saying F that.

Well judging by the demo thats exactly what he's doing.

[Chromie]

Rockworm503 wrote...

jreezy wrote...

Rockworm503 wrote...

jreezy wrote...

Rockworm503 wrote...
I watched the Splinter Cell gameplay footage and its more painful to watch than I expected...

I thought this was third echelon... supposed to deny their involvement not CTU where Jack Bauer kills everyone to stop the bad guys.

It's actually Fourth Echelon now, which Sam is in charge of.

Well isn't plausible deniability the entire premise?  Or is Fisher saying F that  LOLOL I want to kill the bad guys?

I sure hope Sam isn't pew pew crazy and just saying F that.

Well judging by the demo thats exactly what he's doing.

Hell judging by Convicition I bet he is.

[Chromie]

android654 wrote...
It was obvious that Microsoft was copying off of Nintendo's paper when they announced their smart glass. People love gimmicky stuff like that. Anyone who denies this needs to look at the success of the Wii Fit and the respone from both Sony and Microsoft by making  Move and Kinect. It makes money to follow what Nintendo does so they're going to gauge it then apply it in a half-assed way. It only works for Nintendo because they have broader appeal, while the "hardcore" gamers on the PS3 and 360 could care less about it.

PCs do it better: why I don’t care about Smartglass. This made me chuckle.

Modifié par Skelter192, 07 juin 2012 - 01:32 .

[Rockworm503]

greengoron89 wrote...

Sorry, but Splinter Cell is dead to me - no Michael Ironside, no Sam Fisher.

They could've made a new game and done anything with it.  Instead this.  The Ironside being gone is bad enough but this isn't even Splinter Cell no matter how you slice it.
I guess Tom Clancy is looking up to Micheal Bay now.

[Tazzmission]

E3 2012: Watch Dogs Coming to Consoles and PC, Could Hit Wii U
Ubisoft confirms platform plans.

In an interview at E3 today, Ubisoft senior vice president of sales and marketing Tony Key confirmed to IGN that Watch Dogs is headed to consoles and PC and could even come to Wii U.

“PS3, 360 and PC,” Key told us when we asked him to confirm which systems we can expect Watch Dogs to be released on.


In addition, we also asked Key if the game could come to Wii U.

“Not at this time," he said. "We have so many titles in development for Wii U right now that we need to keep that team focused and this is a very very ambitious game. But it’s not out of the question.”

Watch Dogs was announced earlier this week during Ubisoft's E3 press conference. For everything we know so far, check out our Watch Dogs wiki.

http://www.ign.com/a...could-hit-wii-u

[Chromie]

Rockworm503 wrote...

greengoron89 wrote...

Sorry, but Splinter Cell is dead to me - no Michael Ironside, no Sam Fisher.

They could've made a new game and done anything with it.  Instead this.  The Ironside being gone is bad enough but this isn't even Splinter Cell no matter how you slice it.
I guess Tom Clancy is looking up to Micheal Bay now.

Let's not forget this now =P

[Rockworm503]

Skelter192 wrote...

Rockworm503 wrote...

greengoron89 wrote...

Sorry, but Splinter Cell is dead to me - no Michael Ironside, no Sam Fisher.

They could've made a new game and done anything with it.  Instead this.  The Ironside being gone is bad enough but this isn't even Splinter Cell no matter how you slice it.
I guess Tom Clancy is looking up to Micheal Bay now.

Let's not forget this now =P

Yeah thats pretty low even for Ubisoft.  So worried many of the great games showed were by Ubisoft and I can't shake the feeling that all of them are going to have day one DLC and online only DRM even for singleplayer.  I want to believe Ubisoft has learned their lesson but its hard to ignore how its been with them lately.

[android654]

Rockworm503 wrote...

Skelter192 wrote...

Rockworm503 wrote...

greengoron89 wrote...

Sorry, but Splinter Cell is dead to me - no Michael Ironside, no Sam Fisher.

They could've made a new game and done anything with it.  Instead this.  The Ironside being gone is bad enough but this isn't even Splinter Cell no matter how you slice it.
I guess Tom Clancy is looking up to Micheal Bay now.

Let's not forget this now =P

Yeah thats pretty low even for Ubisoft.  So worried many of the great games showed were by Ubisoft and I can't shake the feeling that all of them are going to have day one DLC and online only DRM even for singleplayer.  I want to believe Ubisoft has learned their lesson but its hard to ignore how its been with them lately.

This may well be the case, but they'll get my money for Watch Dogs. Atleast they haven't been that bad with Assassin's Creed.