Hey man, not trying to brag, or argue for that matter, just trying to make a point. Some of the stuff in the MP works well because it was designed well, some stuff not so well. I think we just notice the stuff that works well more because there is so much that doesn't. I honestly think it's silly asking for a gun to be toned down when I personally think it's just fine, and there is so much more constuctive stuff we could be asking for them to fix. But hey, whatever man, do your thing.
But, it's also easier to get higher scores with a Paladin, or Carnifex, or a BW, or a Valiant, or BE's..I don't understand what the problem is? This gun is a GOOD gun. We should be thanking Bioware for trying to make decent weapons that work well and asking them to fix the ones that don't. 
What do you mean by "decent weapon"? Is it that you think that if ME3 were a better designed game, weapons would be more powerful?
Or to put it another way, what would make MEcoop better? If guns were very much more powerful and you could have ****tons of fun just blowing everything up, or if the game were harder, punished small mistakes, and made every match a close-run thing were you could only survive with skill, ingenuity and tight teamwork?
I don't really want to pass judgment on which form of videogame is better, but it seems you and GodlessPaladin have different ideas of what makes a game "fun".
Modifié par I_pity_the_fool, 31 mai 2012 - 01:44 .