Please stop N7 matchmaking!
#101
Posté 31 mai 2012 - 10:42
N7 rating is not a good measure of comparing players, and a horrible choice to match players according to it. Please reconsider and change this limitation.
#102
Posté 31 mai 2012 - 10:43
Scylla Costa wrote...
Hi guys,
I will post news about this topic here:
http://social.biowar.../index/12348368
Don't roll them back.
Complainers gonna complain.
I just had 2 golds back to back where I got matched to 3 N7 50's so it doesn't even work all that well anyway.
#103
Posté 31 mai 2012 - 10:43
#104
Posté 31 mai 2012 - 10:43
MoeRayShep wrote...
Yay! They acknowledged it!
Hopefully this will result in prompt changes.
wow, stunned they responded so quickly! This is good news...but I suspect the fix will take some time.....
#105
Posté 31 mai 2012 - 10:44
SeaJayX wrote...
Scylla Costa wrote...
Hi guys,
I will post news about this topic here:
http://social.biowar.../index/12348368
Don't roll them back.
Complainers gonna complain.
I just had 2 golds back to back where I got matched to 3 N7 50's so it doesn't even work all that well anyway.
Complaining about no one joining a lobby for 10 minutes isn't the same as complaining for the sake of complaining.
#106
Posté 31 mai 2012 - 10:45
SeaJayX wrote...
Scylla Costa wrote...
Hi guys,
I will post news about this topic here:
http://social.biowar.../index/12348368
Don't roll them back.
Complainers gonna complain.
I just had 2 golds back to back where I got matched to 3 N7 50's so it doesn't even work all that well anyway.
Sure, I'm only complaining for the sake of complaining... stfu.
Roll back the changes or come up with a better solution, ANYTHING that doesn't meant my lobby doesn't even get one person in after 15 minutes.
Modifié par Zjarcal, 31 mai 2012 - 10:47 .
#107
Posté 31 mai 2012 - 10:45
Scylla Costa wrote...
Hi guys,
I will post news about this topic here:
http://social.biowar.../index/12348368
Hello gracious, kind, wise, magnificent Bioware person!
If you would do me the immeasurable favor of broaching this suggestion to your company's internal deliberations, you would have my undying gratitude; I shall also name my firstborn child for you:
Latency-based matchmaking!
That is all.
#108
Posté 31 mai 2012 - 10:45
xelf207 wrote...
Again, I encourage people to make note of the N7s in each varied lobby and determine the average/mean N7 of the lobby.
That way we could determine if you're really unaffected by this or not.
For example, I got put into a lobby with a level 14 and a level 410. My N7 is 218, which is awfully close to the average of that lobby.
heres some numbers for you, my n7 is 1223, first lobby, 1200, 1800, 2000, so average over 1500, second lobby, 600, 800, 200, so average 700, 3rd lobby 3100, 900, 600, average over 1600
i seem to be unaffected
#109
Posté 31 mai 2012 - 10:48
N7 ranks 0 - 120 match up more frequently than not.
N7 ranks 121-300 match up more frequently than not.
N7 ranks 301-500 match up more frequently than not.
N7 ranks 501-1000 match up more frequently than not.
N7 ranks 1000-infinite match up more frequently than not.
Something like this. Let's face it, once you reach above N7 1000, it really doesn't matter.
#110
Posté 31 mai 2012 - 10:48
#111
Posté 31 mai 2012 - 10:49
rymoulton wrote...
SeaJayX wrote...
Scylla Costa wrote...
Hi guys,
I will post news about this topic here:
http://social.biowar.../index/12348368
Don't roll them back.
Complainers gonna complain.
I just had 2 golds back to back where I got matched to 3 N7 50's so it doesn't even work all that well anyway.
Complaining about no one joining a lobby for 10 minutes isn't the same as complaining for the sake of complaining.
You make a new lobby then.
That usually does the trick.
#112
Posté 31 mai 2012 - 10:50
Zjarcal wrote...
SeaJayX wrote...
Scylla Costa wrote...
Hi guys,
I will post news about this topic here:
http://social.biowar.../index/12348368
Don't roll them back.
Complainers gonna complain.
I just had 2 golds back to back where I got matched to 3 N7 50's so it doesn't even work all that well anyway.
Sure, I'm only complaining for the sake of complaining... stfu.
Roll back the changes or come up with a better solution, ANYTHING that doesn't meant my lobby doesn't even get one person in after 15 minutes.
Go watch some pokemon or whatever instead.
#113
Posté 31 mai 2012 - 10:50
Velocithon wrote...
Why not just have it like so:
N7 ranks 0 - 120 match up more frequently than not.
N7 ranks 121-300 match up more frequently than not.
N7 ranks 301-500 match up more frequently than not.
N7 ranks 501-1000 match up more frequently than not.
N7 ranks 1000-infinite match up more frequently than not.
Something like this. Let's face it, once you reach above N7 1000, it really doesn't matter.
HELL NO!
That's even worse than what we just had!
#114
Posté 31 mai 2012 - 10:51
#115
Posté 31 mai 2012 - 10:54
#116
Posté 31 mai 2012 - 10:55
MoeRayShep wrote...
Scylla Costa wrote...
Hi guys,
I will post news about this topic here:
http://social.biowar.../index/12348368
Hello gracious, kind, wise, magnificent Bioware person!
If you would do me the immeasurable favor of broaching this suggestion to your company's internal deliberations, you would have my undying gratitude; I shall also name my firstborn child for you:
Latency-based matchmaking!
That is all.
That would be great, so there would be no more deaths by staying "frozen" when you are trying to revive a teammate
#117
Posté 31 mai 2012 - 10:55
datako12 wrote...
xelf207 wrote...
Again, I encourage people to make note of the N7s in each varied lobby and determine the average/mean N7 of the lobby.
That way we could determine if you're really unaffected by this or not.
For example, I got put into a lobby with a level 14 and a level 410. My N7 is 218, which is awfully close to the average of that lobby.
heres some numbers for you, my n7 is 1223, first lobby, 1200, 1800, 2000, so average over 1500, second lobby, 600, 800, 200, so average 700, 3rd lobby 3100, 900, 600, average over 1600
i seem to be unaffected
Weird that you're not affected, but it's been confirmed anyway.
SeaJayX wrote...
rymoulton wrote...
SeaJayX wrote...
Scylla Costa wrote...
Hi guys,
I will post news about this topic here:
http://social.biowar.../index/12348368
Don't roll them back.
Complainers gonna complain.
I just had 2 golds back to back where I got matched to 3 N7 50's so it doesn't even work all that well anyway.
Complaining about no one joining a lobby for 10 minutes isn't the same as complaining for the sake of complaining.
You make a new lobby then.
That usually does the trick.
Not in a lot of cases, no. By setting up the system this way, they divided the playerbase up into smaller groups. It doesn't take a genius to guess that it's going to be harder to find/create a full lobby when there are less people that the game is willing to place you with.
#118
Posté 31 mai 2012 - 10:55
The End.
#119
Posté 31 mai 2012 - 10:55
Right now they match it way tighter. This isn't.Adhok42 wrote...
Velocithon wrote...
Why not just have it like so:
N7 ranks 0 - 120 match up more frequently than not.
N7 ranks 121-300 match up more frequently than not.
N7 ranks 301-500 match up more frequently than not.
N7 ranks 501-1000 match up more frequently than not.
N7 ranks 1000-infinite match up more frequently than not.
Something like this. Let's face it, once you reach above N7 1000, it really doesn't matter.
HELL NO!
That's even worse than what we just had!
Besides, it doesn't HAVE to wait for those ranked N7 to begin a match. Just "more frequently". That could be 60% of the time, or 51% of the time. Whatever.
I don't matching via N7 rank. It's stupid and pointless. But if they are going to do it, here's a suggestion.
Modifié par Velocithon, 31 mai 2012 - 10:58 .
#120
Posté 31 mai 2012 - 10:56
#121
Posté 31 mai 2012 - 10:56
I also honestly love jumping into a game-in-progress. It bypasses lobby room politics, I can usually help swing things in favor of the other players, and most importantly no one goes "Good GOD look at that N7 rating" until after I've established that I've earned my rank..
For these reasons, I am against making N7 rank pairing a mandatory part of the matchmaking system. Optional, sure, but not mandatory.
#122
Posté 31 mai 2012 - 10:58
SeaJayX wrote...
Scylla Costa wrote...
Hi guys,
I will post news about this topic here:
http://social.biowar.../index/12348368
Don't roll them back.
Complainers gonna complain.
I just had 2 golds back to back where I got matched to 3 N7 50's so it doesn't even work all that well anyway.
Do roll back, thanks.
Yesterday I had several silver matches with two friends. We have an average N7 of 1500 and not even one person joined the game for that an hour or so. I guess it's probably because that are so few high N7 players playing silver.
Before the patch it's easy to get randoms to join. Now not so. Bad.
#123
Posté 31 mai 2012 - 10:58
#124
Posté 31 mai 2012 - 10:58
Scylla Costa wrote...
Hi guys,
I will post news about this topic here:
http://social.biowar.../index/12348368
That's the spirit!!!
#125
Posté 31 mai 2012 - 10:58
Velocithon wrote...
Right now the match it way tighter. This isn't.
I don't WANT a tighter match! This loose configuration is the noose being slipped over the neck. Tighten the margin, tighten the noose. Nobody lower would promote making it impossible to find anyone for those of us at a higher level.





Retour en haut




