Aller au contenu

Photo

SMGs are the better Assault Rifles?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
Aucune réponse à ce sujet

#1
DeltaTimo

DeltaTimo
  • Members
  • 108 messages
Today I thought about looking a bit closer at the difference between SMGs and Assault Rifle.
There's one big difference. -> The weight, which is incredibly lower on SMGs than on Assault Rifles.
Looking into the source of the Mass Effect Wikia I found out that:
The Phaeston:
  • Weight: width: 33%
  • Capacity: width: 68
  • Fire Rate: width: 60
  • Damage: width: 15
  • Accuracy: width: 24
  • Clip Size / Reserve: 50 / 300
The M-9 Tempest:
  • Weight: width: 18%
  • Capacity: width: 72%
  • Fire Rate: width: 70%
  • Damage: width: 12%
  • Accuracy: width: 30%
  • Clip Size / Reserve: 50 / 350
A few ingame screenshots:Phaestonhttp://puu.sh/ycYQ
and
M-9 Tempest

http://puu.sh/ycYu.
How is the M-9 Tempest almost as effective as the Phaeston while it's a lot of less heavy?
Also notice the M-9 Tempest ist not an Assault Rifle.
My conclusion: I think Assault Rifles are underpowered, too weak and too heavy compared to the SMGs, which have almost as effective.

Modifié par DeltaTimo, 01 juin 2012 - 11:53 .