263 réponses à ce sujet

[Catamantaloedis]

Mahrac wrote...

Catamantaloedis wrote...

The mods do their job well, in my presence.

They realize that truth is a very hard thing to accept in this community, and therefore they become more cautious when they see me doing my work, because they know that many will object to reality and begin their mindless posting.

Then you would be perma-baned

I don't break the rules often. 

I have my moments where I cross the line, having been faced with the sheer idiocy of the denizens of this site, but I more or less respect the rules of this upstanding site.

[Vigilant111]

Catamantaloedis wrote...

Vigilant111 wrote...

OP: NO ONE ACCEPTS ANYTHING UNTIL THE EC COMES OUT, MAYBE NOT EVEN THEN

So when the EC comes and shoots the dying dog that is the Indoctrination Theory in the back of the head, it will continue to live on anyway, won't it?

Unfortunately yes, appearantly headcanon is very popular these days

[Catamantaloedis]

sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...

Catamantaloedis wrote...

If the Cataylst is lying about the other endings as well, which you would be hard pressed to prove, then their is no ending and you are left with nothing except for speculation and guesses.

The only thing which you can do is accept that the Cataylst is telling the truth, or make up whatever the hell you want. 

I dont have any headcanon. I'm simply following what the Cataylst says. It says the Reapers will obey me, therefore they will. 

I didn't think I'd have to post this again:

Do you think you can control us? You will die, you will lose everything you have. The reapers will obey you.

Okay, so here's a nightmare situation for you that you didn't think about. See Starbrat is still around. Do you think you can control Starbrat? The reapers may obey you, but they still may obey Starbrat unless you can control Starbrat. But there's the catch. Starbrat says "The Reapers will obey you." It never said anything about It obeying you. You and Starbrat are going to have a battle of wills. You just bet our lives on it. If you lose that battle of wills we're ****ed.

Think about that and be dismayed.

Yes, you see the Citadel fly off. They've harvested enough humans for a capital ship by this time. So no need to hang around. Oh, and lets destroy the mass relays so that the Sword Fleet can't follow us while we go harvest the other races for destroyers. Bye Bye. Have fun fighting the little guy.

Cool speculation you have there. 

[ReXspec]

sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...

Catamantaloedis wrote...

If the Cataylst is lying about the other endings as well, which you would be hard pressed to prove, then their is no ending and you are left with nothing except for speculation and guesses.

The only thing which you can do is accept that the Cataylst is telling the truth, or make up whatever the hell you want. 

I dont have any headcanon. I'm simply following what the Cataylst says. It says the Reapers will obey me, therefore they will. 

I didn't think I'd have to post this again:

Do you think you can control us? You will die, you will lose everything you have. The reapers will obey you.

Okay, so here's a nightmare situation for you that you didn't think about. See Starbrat is still around. Do you think you can control Starbrat? The reapers may obey you, but they still may obey Starbrat unless you can control Starbrat. But there's the catch. Starbrat says "The Reapers will obey you." It never said anything about It obeying you. You and Starbrat are going to have a battle of wills. You just bet our lives on it. If you lose that battle of wills we're ****ed.

Think about that and be dismayed.

Yes, you see the Citadel fly off. They've harvested enough humans for a capital ship by this time. So no need to hang around. Oh, and lets destroy the mass relays so that the Sword Fleet can't follow us while we go harvest the other races for destroyers. Bye Bye. Have fun fighting the little guy.

Cata will say that he can control the Reapers because the star brat said so and that it will supposedly end the cycle, even though the ending didn't really give us any closure on that choice. lol

[Catamantaloedis]

Vigilant111 wrote...

Catamantaloedis wrote...

Vigilant111 wrote...

OP: NO ONE ACCEPTS ANYTHING UNTIL THE EC COMES OUT, MAYBE NOT EVEN THEN

So when the EC comes and shoots the dying dog that is the Indoctrination Theory in the back of the head, it will continue to live on anyway, won't it?

Unfortunately yes, appearantly headcanon is very popular these days

Then I will have much work left to do.

[Vigilant111]

Catamantaloedis wrote...

The mods do their job well, in my presence.

They realize that truth is a very hard thing to accept in this community, and therefore they become more cautious when they see me doing my work, because they know that many will object to reality and begin their mindless posting.

You surely have a very high opinion of yourself, I gotta say I admire it

[Mahrac]

Catamantaloedis wrote...

Mahrac wrote...

Catamantaloedis wrote...

The mods do their job well, in my presence.

They realize that truth is a very hard thing to accept in this community, and therefore they become more cautious when they see me doing my work, because they know that many will object to reality and begin their mindless posting.

Then you would be perma-baned

I don't break the rules often. 

I have my moments where I cross the line, having been faced with the sheer idiocy of the denizens of this site, but I more or less respect the rules of this upstanding site.

I seem to be recalling a beastiality comment. It might be just me, but I think that would warrent a perma-ban.

[ReXspec]

Vigilant111 wrote...

Catamantaloedis wrote...

The mods do their job well, in my presence.

They realize that truth is a very hard thing to accept in this community, and therefore they become more cautious when they see me doing my work, because they know that many will object to reality and begin their mindless posting.

You surely have a very high opinion of yourself, I gotta say I admire it

Ten bucks says he didn't think that was sarcasm until he read this post.

Modifié par ReXspec, 03 juin 2012 - 05:20 .

[o Ventus]

Vigilant111 wrote...

Catamantaloedis wrote...

The mods do their job well, in my presence.

They realize that truth is a very hard thing to accept in this community, and therefore they become more cautious when they see me doing my work, because they know that many will object to reality and begin their mindless posting.

You surely have a very high opinion of yourself, I gotta say I admire it

I wish my god complex was as testosterone-fueled as his is.

[Catamantaloedis]

Mahrac wrote...

Catamantaloedis wrote...

Mahrac wrote...

Catamantaloedis wrote...

The mods do their job well, in my presence.

They realize that truth is a very hard thing to accept in this community, and therefore they become more cautious when they see me doing my work, because they know that many will object to reality and begin their mindless posting.

Then you would be perma-baned

I don't break the rules often. 

I have my moments where I cross the line, having been faced with the sheer idiocy of the denizens of this site, but I more or less respect the rules of this upstanding site.

I seem to be recalling a beastiality comment. It might be just me, but I think that would warrent a perma-ban.

I suggested that consenting to sex with a Krogan or Vorcha is similar to having sex with one of my horses. I stand by that comment wholeheartedly.

But this topic is about control.

[Mahrac]

ReXspec wrote...

Vigilant111 wrote...

Catamantaloedis wrote...

The mods do their job well, in my presence.

They realize that truth is a very hard thing to accept in this community, and therefore they become more cautious when they see me doing my work, because they know that many will object to reality and begin their mindless posting.

You surely have a very high opinion of yourself, I gotta say I admire it

Ten bucks says he didn't think that was sarcasm until he read this post.

Wouldn't take that at 100:1 odds

[xsdob]

ReXspec wrote...

xsdob wrote...

Okay, this is getting out of hand and turning into an unamusing hatefest really quickly. Either get civil/funny or I will flood this post with horrific images and make it deader than a dead albatross.

OH PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF GOD DOOOOOO!

Maybe you won't get banned because of a certain butthurt Cata.  lol

You sure? I can pull up some pretty nasty things.

Modifié par xsdob, 03 juin 2012 - 05:22 .

[o Ventus]

Catamantaloedis wrote...

I suggested that consenting to sex with a Krogan or Vorcha is similar to having sex with one of my horses. I stand by that comment wholeheartedly.

But this topic is about control.

 
So I can add hypocrite to my growing list of reasons why you're an objectively bad person.

Modifié par o Ventus, 03 juin 2012 - 05:27 .

[Mahrac]

Catamantaloedis wrote...

Mahrac wrote...

Catamantaloedis wrote...

Mahrac wrote...

Catamantaloedis wrote...

The mods do their job well, in my presence.

They realize that truth is a very hard thing to accept in this community, and therefore they become more cautious when they see me doing my work, because they know that many will object to reality and begin their mindless posting.

Then you would be perma-baned

I don't break the rules often. 

I have my moments where I cross the line, having been faced with the sheer idiocy of the denizens of this site, but I more or less respect the rules of this upstanding site.

I seem to be recalling a beastiality comment. It might be just me, but I think that would warrent a perma-ban.

I suggested that consenting to sex with a Krogan or Vorcha is similar to having sex with one of my horses. I stand by that comment wholeheartedly.

But this topic is about control.

You brought up banning. I'm just pointing out that sometimes the mods don't do what the forumgoers want.

And the blue shoe still has worse stitching than the other two pairs.

[D24O]

Catamantaloedis wrote...

 http://desmond.image...png&res=landing

Does anyoone else find thie pic hilarious?

[ReXspec]

xsdob wrote...

ReXspec wrote...

xsdob wrote...

Okay, this is getting out of hand and turning into an unamusing hatefest really quickly. Either get civil/funny or I will flood this post with horrific images and make it deader than a dead albatross.

OH PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF GOD DOOOOOO!

Maybe you won't get banned because of a certain butthurt Cata.  lol

You sure? I can pull up some pretty nasty things.

Considering this topic is probably going to be closed anyway?  I'd say, go for it. lol

[D24O]

Catamantaloedis wrote...


I suggested that consenting to sex with a Krogan or Vorcha is similar to having sex with one of my horses. I stand by that comment wholeheartedly.

But this topic is about control.

You and those f*** horses again. Do you try to pawn them off on every thread you make?

[Mahrac]

D24O wrote...

Catamantaloedis wrote...

 http://desmond.image...png&res=landing

Does anyoone else find thie pic hilarious?

His 'checkmark' is slightly limp. Must be because he doesn't have Control yet.

Modifié par Mahrac, 03 juin 2012 - 05:27 .

[Catamantaloedis]

Mahrac wrote...

Catamantaloedis wrote...

Mahrac wrote...

Catamantaloedis wrote...

Mahrac wrote...

Catamantaloedis wrote...

The mods do their job well, in my presence.

They realize that truth is a very hard thing to accept in this community, and therefore they become more cautious when they see me doing my work, because they know that many will object to reality and begin their mindless posting.

Then you would be perma-baned

I don't break the rules often. 

I have my moments where I cross the line, having been faced with the sheer idiocy of the denizens of this site, but I more or less respect the rules of this upstanding site.

I seem to be recalling a beastiality comment. It might be just me, but I think that would warrent a perma-ban.

I suggested that consenting to sex with a Krogan or Vorcha is similar to having sex with one of my horses. I stand by that comment wholeheartedly.

But this topic is about control.

You brought up banning. I'm just pointing out that sometimes the mods don't do what the forumgoers want.

And the blue shoe still has worse stitching than the other two pairs.

If the other two are blue as well, you cant criticize the one with bad stitching for being blue when they all are. You criticize the stitching.

Mods should not do what the forumgoers want, and with good reason. Mods tend to be rational people, forumgoers tend to be irrational, savage, mindless herds of sheep.

Modifié par Catamantaloedis, 03 juin 2012 - 05:26 .

[D24O]

Mahrac wrote...

D24O wrote...

Catamantaloedis wrote...

 http://desmond.image...png&res=landing

Does anyoone else find thie pic hilarious?

His checkmark is slightly limpd. Must be because he doesn't have Control yet.

Lolmspaint

[ReXspec]

[quote]Catamantaloedis wrote...

You brought up banning. I'm just pointing out that sometimes the mods don't do what the forumgoers want.

And the blue shoe still has worse stitching than the other two pairs.[/quote]

If the other two are blue as well, you cant criticize the one with bad stitching for being blue when they all are. You criticize the stitching.

Mods should not do what the forumgoers want, and with good reason. Mods tend to be rational people, forumgoers tend to be irrational, savage, mindless herds of sheep.

[/quote]

May want to read the bold/underlined part and take a nice long look at yourself in the mirror while repeating that line over and over again in your head.

[Mahrac]

Catamantaloedis wrote...

If the other two are blue as well, you cant criticize the one with bad stitching for being blue when they all are. You criticize the stitching.

Mods should not do what the forumgoers want, and with good reason. Mods tend to be rational people, forumgoers tend to be irrational, savage, mindless herds of sheep.

Except the colors and the stitching are the only real differences between the three. Alright I'm a bit confused on how they managed to stitch the green one togeather and the stitching on the red is a bit illogical, but they both look like they'll hold up over time. the blue pair might fall apart in an hour, maybe a week, or there's a slight chance they'll last as long as the other two.

and thus I will not be banned just because you report me, if you report me. Thanks for making my point.

Modifié par Mahrac, 03 juin 2012 - 05:32 .

[Catamantaloedis]

Mahrac wrote...

Catamantaloedis wrote...

If the other two are blue as well, you cant criticize the one with bad stitching for being blue when they all are. You criticize the stitching.

Mods should not do what the forumgoers want, and with good reason. Mods tend to be rational people, forumgoers tend to be irrational, savage, mindless herds of sheep.

Except the colors and the stitching are the only real differences between the three. Alright I'm a bit confused on how they managed to stitch the green one togeather and the stitching on the red is a bit illogical, but they both look like they should hold up over time. the blue pair might fall apart in an hour, maybe a week, or there's a slight chance they'll last as long as the other two.

and thus I will not be banned just because you report me, if you report me. Thanks for making my point.

Except the color is symbolic of the endings all being impossible in real life. 

It has very little to do with the actual merits of the endings and thus pointing out that Control is probably impossible is not a good argument against picking control because all of the endings are probably impossible.

[Mahrac]

Catamantaloedis wrote...

Mahrac wrote...

Catamantaloedis wrote...

If the other two are blue as well, you cant criticize the one with bad stitching for being blue when they all are. You criticize the stitching.

Mods should not do what the forumgoers want, and with good reason. Mods tend to be rational people, forumgoers tend to be irrational, savage, mindless herds of sheep.

Except the colors and the stitching are the only real differences between the three. Alright I'm a bit confused on how they managed to stitch the green one togeather and the stitching on the red is a bit illogical, but they both look like they should hold up over time. the blue pair might fall apart in an hour, maybe a week, or there's a slight chance they'll last as long as the other two.

and thus I will not be banned just because you report me, if you report me. Thanks for making my point.

Except the color is symbolic of the endings all being impossible in real life. 

It has very little to do with the actual merits of the endings and thus pointing out that Control is probably impossible is not a good argument against picking control because all of the endings are probably impossible.

Re-read my post. the stitching isn't refering to the imposibility, it's refering to longevity.

[teh DRUMPf!!]

D24O wrote...

Catamantaloedis wrote...

 http://desmond.image...png&res=landing

Does anyoone else find thie pic hilarious?

I live for these pics in Cameltoeidis's threads.


As for the OP, I think Control is somewhat valid alternative, but that Synthesis can accomplish the same and more.