Aller au contenu

Petition to rollback Patch 1.03 to 1.02


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
248 réponses à ce sujet

#26
Jackums

Jackums
  • Members
  • 1 479 messages

Atheosis wrote...

No thanks.



#27
DNC Protoman

DNC Protoman
  • Members
  • 2 104 messages

Warrenkh wrote...

Perhaps next time, they should have test the patch before release. I mean, the ULM bug, the tactical cloak bug, and the vanguard bug etc etc can all be tested very easily by getting into a real game.



This.  I also doubt they even once play tested this patch.

#28
nhcre8tv1

nhcre8tv1
  • Members
  • 2 395 messages
No.
Well no personally, Reave sound bug is the best thing ever of all time.
But I agree with everything else, I can't relate to the matchmaking thing, my N7 is about 550, but if people are having problems with it, then it's whatever. It kind of sickens me that the Multiplayer EA forced into their game(s) they publish don't even get a proper patch.

#29
Schneemann

Schneemann
  • Members
  • 772 messages
The patch doesn't fix what it claims to do and instead breaks evem more stuff, especially matchmaking. So yeah, rollback. Especially if 1.04 would again take months to come out, I'd rather wait playing 1.02 instead of 1.03.

#30
DNC Protoman

DNC Protoman
  • Members
  • 2 104 messages

nhcre8tv1 wrote...

No.
Well no personally, Reave sound bug is the best thing ever of all time.
But I agree with everything else, I can't relate to the matchmaking thing, my N7 is about 550, but if people are having problems with it, then it's whatever. It kind of sickens me that the Multiplayer EA forced into their game(s) they publish don't even get a proper patch.


so no reave sound bug is worth not being able to play matchmaking?

#31
Guest_XxTaLoNxX_*

Guest_XxTaLoNxX_*
  • Guests

nhcre8tv1 wrote...

No.
Well no personally, Reave sound bug is the best thing ever of all time.
But I agree with everything else, I can't relate to the matchmaking thing, my N7 is about 550, but if people are having problems with it, then it's whatever. It kind of sickens me that the Multiplayer EA forced into their game(s) they publish don't even get a proper patch.


Ok, I can relate to the Reave sound bug. But it's fully possible to revert most of the changes and keep the beneficial and cosmetic changes like the Reave sound fix.

And if it's not possible I would rather live with the Reave remixes than deal with patch 1.03 anyday.

Modifié par XxTaLoNxX, 03 juin 2012 - 03:00 .


#32
Bushido Effect

Bushido Effect
  • Members
  • 1 096 messages
I can't agree with TC. only the matchmaking is a problem. Hence I made that topic. Everything else is fine for me.

http://social.biowar.../index/12391076

Modifié par Bushido Effect, 03 juin 2012 - 03:02 .


#33
DNC Protoman

DNC Protoman
  • Members
  • 2 104 messages

Schneemann wrote...

The patch doesn't fix what it claims to do and instead breaks evem more stuff, especially matchmaking. So yeah, rollback. Especially if 1.04 would again take months to come out, I'd rather wait playing 1.02 instead of 1.03.


This game will be a ghost town if the current matchmaking system stays for the months it takes to make 1.04

#34
Fortack

Fortack
  • Members
  • 2 609 messages

XxTaLoNxX wrote...

Because on Gold, you barely get to make it to an ammo box and back to your position in time. And god help you if you have to go to multiple boxes to get grenades.

This issue is extremely noticable on Condor where the ammo boxes are set far away from the best starting position on top of the hill. It's better to wait for the next wave to start before going and getting ammo so you don't accidentally allow a spawn to occur on the top of the hill.

There is literally NO breathing room between waves now. Which is a bad thing for the most part. I was fine with the pacing of the match before these changes.


The ammo crates of Condor are the problem, not necessarily the faster waves. Ammo has also never been an issue for me until I unlocked the new Harrier which has ****** poor ammo capacity. You can also use the ammo packs for those rare times you run out of ammunition. Having said that, I don't like camping and usually run around to map searching for new enemies. I have no problem to replenish ammo and grenades along the way. But I guess it can become an issue when the team tries to hold a good defensible position.

If many people don't like the faster waves it should be fairly easy to add an option to the mission settings so everyone can play a match on their preferable pace.

#35
DNC Protoman

DNC Protoman
  • Members
  • 2 104 messages

Bushido Effect wrote...

I can't agree with TC. only the matchmaking is a problem. Hence I made that topic. Everything else is fine for me.

http://social.biowar.../index/12391076


I agree with you BOTH.  problem is, how do we know they can roll back the matchmaking without rolling back the patch?

The matchmaking needs fixed NOW or this game is done.  If the patch goes down to achieve that, so be it.

#36
Guest_XxTaLoNxX_*

Guest_XxTaLoNxX_*
  • Guests

Fortack wrote...

XxTaLoNxX wrote...

Because on Gold, you barely get to make it to an ammo box and back to your position in time. And god help you if you have to go to multiple boxes to get grenades.

This issue is extremely noticable on Condor where the ammo boxes are set far away from the best starting position on top of the hill. It's better to wait for the next wave to start before going and getting ammo so you don't accidentally allow a spawn to occur on the top of the hill.

There is literally NO breathing room between waves now. Which is a bad thing for the most part. I was fine with the pacing of the match before these changes.


The ammo crates of Condor are the problem, not necessarily the faster waves. Ammo has also never been an issue for me until I unlocked the new Harrier which has ****** poor ammo capacity. You can also use the ammo packs for those rare times you run out of ammunition. Having said that, I don't like camping and usually run around to map searching for new enemies. I have no problem to replenish ammo and grenades along the way. But I guess it can become an issue when the team tries to hold a good defensible position.

If many people don't like the faster waves it should be fairly easy to add an option to the mission settings so everyone can play a match on their preferable pace.


THAT'S actually a good post. Thanks.

DNC Protoman wrote...

Bushido Effect wrote...

I can't agree with TC. only the matchmaking is a problem. Hence I made that topic. Everything else is fine for me.

http://social.biowar.../index/12391076


I agree with you BOTH.  problem is, how do we know they can roll back the matchmaking without rolling back the patch?

The matchmaking needs fixed NOW or this game is done.  If the patch goes down to achieve that, so be it.


This. N7 Matchmaking is hurting the game far worse than the minor annoyances of 1.02 ever were. Pretty soon, it's be a wasteland, like in Fallout... but not as cool.

Modifié par XxTaLoNxX, 03 juin 2012 - 03:05 .


#37
OlekNowaz

OlekNowaz
  • Members
  • 5 messages
 The one good thing (or bad) is that the farmers of firebase white are ****ed now, it has become too hard to face those geth primes with an infiltrator

#38
Omnifarious Nef

Omnifarious Nef
  • Members
  • 3 895 messages
/Signed, I'll take back WRRRWWRRWRWRRR if it means I can actually play the game... The matches that didn't a half hour to set up, would usually just lag or glitch out. I had the Vanguard glitch multiple times as a non vanguard in the past few days... It's just been one big glitch fest. I NEVER got the vanguard glitch before 1.03. And now every class gets it.

#39
DNC Protoman

DNC Protoman
  • Members
  • 2 104 messages

Fortack wrote...

XxTaLoNxX wrote...

Because on Gold, you barely get to make it to an ammo box and back to your position in time. And god help you if you have to go to multiple boxes to get grenades.

This issue is extremely noticable on Condor where the ammo boxes are set far away from the best starting position on top of the hill. It's better to wait for the next wave to start before going and getting ammo so you don't accidentally allow a spawn to occur on the top of the hill.

There is literally NO breathing room between waves now. Which is a bad thing for the most part. I was fine with the pacing of the match before these changes.


The ammo crates of Condor are the problem, not necessarily the faster waves. Ammo has also never been an issue for me until I unlocked the new Harrier which has ****** poor ammo capacity. You can also use the ammo packs for those rare times you run out of ammunition. Having said that, I don't like camping and usually run around to map searching for new enemies. I have no problem to replenish ammo and grenades along the way. But I guess it can become an issue when the team tries to hold a good defensible position.

If many people don't like the faster waves it should be fairly easy to add an option to the mission settings so everyone can play a match on their preferable pace.


Faster wave times = irrelvevant

Mutliplayer 1 hr wait time = gamebreaker

#40
Krozuhsky

Krozuhsky
  • Members
  • 386 messages
*Signed*

#41
DNC Protoman

DNC Protoman
  • Members
  • 2 104 messages

OlekNowaz wrote...

 The one good thing (or bad) is that the farmers of firebase white are ****ed now, it has become too hard to face those geth primes with an infiltrator



Your kidding right?  FBW  farm is FASTER than ever now.

#42
danby

danby
  • Members
  • 272 messages
OOOOOOOOOOOOH so thats why the head shots weren't doing anything to the primes.   Why would they remove that?   Geth primes do major damage.  Theres no need to make them more tough.  Plus they are always surrounded by rocket troopers and hunters.  I don't have time to goof around with them for long.  

#43
Guest_XxTaLoNxX_*

Guest_XxTaLoNxX_*
  • Guests

DNC Protoman wrote...

OlekNowaz wrote...

 The one good thing (or bad) is that the farmers of firebase white are ****ed now, it has become too hard to face those geth primes with an infiltrator



Your kidding right?  FBW  farm is FASTER than ever now.


My N7 is 1560 or 1580... I can't remember. As I don't really care. But anyway, when I do a Matchmaking search for Gold games... ALL I can get now is FBWGG. It can take me now over an hour to find a non-FBWGG game.
For the people that would say "Search for a specific enemy or map then!" that doesn't work. Search for Cerberus... still land in FBWGG, search for Goddess... never find a lobby.
That's ridiculous. An HOUR. :pinched:

Please, give me Patch 1.02 back, this 1.03 crap is just painful. I don't even want to play the game without my friends on anymore... and they are showing up less and less... I wonder why?

:o

Modifié par XxTaLoNxX, 03 juin 2012 - 03:11 .


#44
Rodia Driftwood

Rodia Driftwood
  • Members
  • 2 277 messages

Quackjack wrote...

DNC Protoman wrote...

Rodia Driftwood wrote...

F*** no!. The framerate slowdown was fixed(for me) on the PS3. Not to mention the Falcon is now useful and games are a LOT quicker. These are all problems that can be fixed in due time. You just have to wait for them to fix these issues.

"Petition to rollback to Patch 1.02.. "sigh"



This post is pure lies.


I play PS3 and DNC is right


I play on the PS3 as well and like I said, the framerate slowdown has been fixed FOR ME. I haven't experienced since the patch was released. 

#45
RGFrog

RGFrog
  • Members
  • 2 011 messages

Kronner wrote...

XxTaLoNxX wrote...
Longer wait means my team has a chance to hit-up an ammo box, get grenades from multiple ammo boxes if they need to, AND still get back to their positions.


Shorter wait means more intensity and more credits/time unit.

And you still have enough time to headbutt between waves.


Kronner, it's an insignificant difference. Overall match time is still 20-25 minutes per match to full extraction. 
Even were there a noticeable difference between the before and after, it's a whopping couple of minutes at most. Frankly, you're only going to notice that if you're playing more than 8 hours at a time or you're not playing at all and just running numbers. 

Also, you don't earn more credits and it still takes the same ammount of time to get to the end. The only difference is what you consider is a more intense match which is a local effect unique and different from player to player.

It's not intesity where rounds become harder to win due to tactics change, number increases, boss level frequency by the enemy or say lower effeciency of ammo over the course of a match.

#46
Klokos

Klokos
  • Members
  • 1 509 messages
Rolling back is a silly idea. The kishok is not useless and Primes dieing in more than two shots is not an issue.

#47
Guest_XxTaLoNxX_*

Guest_XxTaLoNxX_*
  • Guests

Klokos wrote...

Rolling back is a silly idea. The kishok is not useless and Primes dieing in more than two shots is not an issue.


Krysae, Black Widow, Widow, Mantis. All of the mentioned snipers are now better than the Kishock. It has no relevence and no redeeming qualities now.

And a GI with a Javelin can still two shot a Prime.

And that's a fact.

Modifié par XxTaLoNxX, 03 juin 2012 - 03:14 .


#48
Morning Elf

Morning Elf
  • Members
  • 498 messages
They need to roll it back. I think it is a reasonable assumption that the N7 matchmaking is a client change--it coincided with the patch release. (PC folks got it before the console folks.) So in order to fix it, they either need to roll back the patch or spend another couple of months working on the patch and getting it certified.

Normally, I think statements like "if X isn't fixed, this game is done" to be ridiculous hyperbole, but in this case, I think it's appropriate. I've been playing a lot less since the patch and I'm not sure how long my patience will last.

If they're able to revert the change without a client update, this is all moot, but I don't think that's the case.

#49
Pigdog3459

Pigdog3459
  • Members
  • 145 messages
** Signed

#50
Dynamik78

Dynamik78
  • Members
  • 923 messages
Support for this