Aller au contenu

Petition to rollback Patch 1.03 to 1.02


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
248 réponses à ce sujet

#76
Koenig888

Koenig888
  • Members
  • 1 964 messages
Signed.

I'm also getting a lot more DC post-patch/Rebellion. Not sure whether this is just my luck or due to the patch/Rebellion. Earlier today, my Kroguard was on his way to an all-time high score when I got DCed post-extraction but just before the score came up (I was the host). Most frustrating!

#77
Lee80

Lee80
  • Members
  • 2 349 messages
Drop the match making, readd head shots, fix the things that were not actually fixed but listed. I don't think I want a roll back, but a version 2.0 of this patch....interesting notion patches for patches.

-shutters-

#78
tCruzin4lyfe

tCruzin4lyfe
  • Members
  • 254 messages
Signed

#79
RedSteel23

RedSteel23
  • Members
  • 50 messages
 I honestly can't speak on every single detail of the patch, because of work I have not been able to play every second of every day and test everything. However, the other night when I did get a chance to play, three things were extremely noticeable to me. I play on PS3 by the way.

The first is a negative and that is setting up a lobby. Before, I host a match and within a minute, lobby is full and ready to go. Now I find myself waiting upwards of 10 minutes, or more just find players. What is up with this? I host because I have a fast connection. And anytime I join a match, it's just usually really laggy. But now it's hard to do either.

The second thing is the biggest improvement and that is the fix in memory leak, or whatever they did. I played for three hours and never saw the framerate drop, even for a second. It usually got so bad after a couple hours that if there was one frame movement every three seconds, that was a huge accomplishment. It was down right unplayable after a couple hours. If it was a long play session...I might have summarized it to being my poor PS3. But after two hours? No. Now that is gone, I am love with multiplayer again. The third and final thing is small, but it was noticeable enough that I am happy for it.

No more pause between rounds. Round ends and three seconds later, round begins. No more waiting like, "Ugh come on!" it transitions right to it. I love the patch even more for that reason.

But yeah, all those things OP listed, if those are true...they should be checked out. Because that is pretty bad patching. However, I think everyone needs to give some kudos to Bioware for at least sticking with this game and trying to patch stuff. If they goofed this time, yeah it sucks, but they are at least giving it a good attempt. Just the issues on PS3 alone make it a much more enjoyable game. Now maybe a technical issue fixed here and there could make it even better. Just some random guys two cents. 

#80
Jonathan Shepard

Jonathan Shepard
  • Members
  • 2 056 messages
/signed.

The quality control for ME3 MP is atrocious at this point.

#81
Lee80

Lee80
  • Members
  • 2 349 messages

RedSteel23 wrote...


The second thing is the biggest improvement and that is the fix in memory leak, or whatever they did. I played for three hours and never saw the framerate drop, even for a second. It usually got so bad after a couple hours that if there was one frame movement every three seconds, that was a huge accomplishment. 


This is by far the best (and maybe only) good thing to come out of the patch.  That's why I can't fully support a total rollback.  

#82
Traim Eisenblut

Traim Eisenblut
  • Members
  • 598 messages
Signed.

I really wonder who made this crap? I`ve seen independent developers and even non-profit freetime projects fixing more stuff in a shorter amount of time without introducing so much new fail. This is a AAA title? Who is actually programming this? Who is testing it? How can someone on a professional level release such a broken patch? How is it not noticed in a company that big by anybody that this patch is one big load of crap?
BioWare, it seems to me that your technicians and the quality-control department is not existant and outsourced to a bunch of monkeys in fine dresses.
Please, get someone actually competent into your company. Or shut it down.

#83
DNC Protoman

DNC Protoman
  • Members
  • 2 104 messages

Traim Eisenblut wrote...

Signed.

I really wonder who made this crap? I`ve seen independent developers and even non-profit freetime projects fixing more stuff in a shorter amount of time without introducing so much new fail. This is a AAA title? Who is actually programming this? Who is testing it? How can someone on a professional level release such a broken patch? How is it not noticed in a company that big by anybody that this patch is one big load of crap?
BioWare, it seems to me that your technicians and the quality-control department is not existant and outsourced to a bunch of monkeys in fine dresses.
Please, get someone actually competent into your company. Or shut it down.



Shut-down of Bioware wouldn't suprise me down the road.  EA would have no problem with it.

#84
Traim Eisenblut

Traim Eisenblut
  • Members
  • 598 messages

DNC Protoman wrote...


Shut-down of Bioware wouldn't suprise me down the road.  EA would have no problem with it.


And if they continue to operate on this level of failure, neither do I...

#85
DNC Protoman

DNC Protoman
  • Members
  • 2 104 messages

Traim Eisenblut wrote...

DNC Protoman wrote...


Shut-down of Bioware wouldn't suprise me down the road.  EA would have no problem with it.


And if they continue to operate on this level of failure, neither do I...


Agreed.

#86
drakeSVK

drakeSVK
  • Members
  • 150 messages
I usually play a Drell Adept and restocking grenades between waves is not a problem. I can see how this is an issue to classes with slower movement speed though (but then with the new Grenade Capacity upgrades and Thermal Clip packs this shouldn't be a problem to anyone).

Also, Falcon not fixed? I thought it works pretty well off-host now.

Well, other than that, the new matchmaking is horrible.

#87
YoMaNiTz420

YoMaNiTz420
  • Members
  • 35 messages
They just need to rollback the matchmaking part. I love all the new stuff especially the maps and characters. It's much better to be connected with everyone than just a limited number of people so we can have a new experience everytime.

#88
-Sxx-

-Sxx-
  • Members
  • 1 271 messages
It doesn't need a rollback, it just needs these issues actually fixed. Maybe this will actually get BW's attention. They've been purposely ignoring the ULM bug they FAILED to fix, in which there are many threads concerning the issue still not being solved.

Either way the list in the OP will serve as BW's list of stuff to actually fix, once they get off their backsides and do something properly. If you're gonna do something, at least do it right and right the first time, especially considering how long we have/had to wait for proper fixes >_>

Modifié par Dest1ny, 03 juin 2012 - 04:21 .


#89
Habi33

Habi33
  • Members
  • 101 messages

Traim Eisenblut wrote...

Signed.

I really wonder who made this crap? I`ve seen independent developers and even non-profit freetime projects fixing more stuff in a shorter amount of time without introducing so much new fail. This is a AAA title? Who is actually programming this? Who is testing it? How can someone on a professional level release such a broken patch? How is it not noticed in a company that big by anybody that this patch is one big load of crap?
BioWare, it seems to me that your technicians and the quality-control department is not existant and outsourced to a bunch of monkeys in fine dresses.
Please, get someone actually competent into your company. Or shut it down.


Well said.

#90
AreleX

AreleX
  • Members
  • 2 292 messages
signed

#91
FataliTensei

FataliTensei
  • Members
  • 1 449 messages
Signed/

#92
KarmaTheAlligator

KarmaTheAlligator
  • Members
  • 1 048 messages
I wonder if all the problems we're having didn't appear while they were testing because they have better computers/connection/hardware than your Average Joe.

#93
lexiconicle

lexiconicle
  • Members
  • 415 messages
I can live with grey boxes on overload, and having to reset my gear every game if it means they take back the patch for a while to fix it and check everything works before rolling it out.

And I agree. If Quality Control weren't sacked the during the production of the final run to the conduit, as I suspect, they have no excuse for what's happened after that, campaign and multiplayer. So much has slipped though the cracks.

Edit: Signed. Sorry. Need to work on my own quality control.

Modifié par lexiconicle, 03 juin 2012 - 04:32 .


#94
Traim Eisenblut

Traim Eisenblut
  • Members
  • 598 messages

KarmaTheAlligator wrote...

I wonder if all the problems we're having didn't appear while they were testing because they have better computers/connection/hardware than your Average Joe.


Yeah, so much better hardware available for the X-Box 360 and the PS3... Plus: a AAA videogame-developer who does not know about system-limitations for test-environments? Even monkeys in fine dresses know about that....so is BioWare run by hamsters instead of monkeys?

#95
Ramsutin

Ramsutin
  • Members
  • 2 000 messages
My rank is like 160 because I saw no reason to promote as i only play gold. So newbies for me if I can find a lobby. Matchmaking is the worst thing in this patch, biotic glitch and the fact rage isn't fixed is bad also. I have played 1 decent game in 3 hours of trying to play.

#96
RBX250

RBX250
  • Members
  • 32 messages
So I know that they can't do daily/weekly patches on the PS3 and 360 for logistical reasons, but why can't they do so on the PC at least? Then, they could patch the consoles monthly with fixes that actually fix problems.

I am a console player and I wouldn't mind waiting for patches provided they actually worked as intended.

I think a rollback is a bad idea, but I can understand where some of the fervor is coming from.

#97
lexiconicle

lexiconicle
  • Members
  • 415 messages

Traim Eisenblut wrote...

KarmaTheAlligator wrote...

I wonder if all the problems we're having didn't appear while they were testing because they have better computers/connection/hardware than your Average Joe.


Yeah, so much better hardware available for the X-Box 360 and the PS3... Plus: a AAA videogame-developer who does not know about system-limitations for test-environments? Even monkeys in fine dresses know about that....so is BioWare run by hamsters instead of monkeys?


That's odd... First time I tried to quote you I was sent to some guy called "Ninja Stan"'s profile page.

Anyway, lay off the Space Hamster. He's done nothing wrong.

#98
JaimasOfRaxis

JaimasOfRaxis
  • Members
  • 2 117 messages
Signed, fix this ****.

#99
KarmaTheAlligator

KarmaTheAlligator
  • Members
  • 1 048 messages

Traim Eisenblut wrote...

KarmaTheAlligator wrote...

I wonder if all the problems we're having didn't appear while they were testing because they have better computers/connection/hardware than your Average Joe.


Yeah, so much better hardware available for the X-Box 360 and the PS3... Plus: a AAA videogame-developer who does not know about system-limitations for test-environments? Even monkeys in fine dresses know about that....so is BioWare run by hamsters instead of monkeys?


Well actually, if they have newer consoles that could mean less problems. And while I admit I know nothing of professional testing, that wouldn't surprise me if they indeed didn't know, or care, about the limitations.

#100
GGW KillerTiger

GGW KillerTiger
  • Members
  • 4 565 messages

Rodia Driftwood wrote...
 games are a LOT quicker

lol no they aren't I've actually noticed an increase in time it takes to finish missions

I am pro rewind patch

Also if Bioware needs true testers I offer my services :innocent:

Modifié par GGW KillerTiger, 03 juin 2012 - 04:39 .