Why would Synthesis stop synthetics from killing organics?
#26
Posté 03 juin 2012 - 11:10
#27
Posté 03 juin 2012 - 11:11
#28
Posté 04 juin 2012 - 01:55
#29
Posté 04 juin 2012 - 02:25
The entire idea was to stop the Reapers to commit genocides every 50,000 years, that exterminate almost all organic life.Ctserber wrote...
The entire idea behind the whole cycle was to stop organics from creating a purely synthetic race that would exterminate all organic life. Thus, the Reapers harvest advanced civilizations before they can create Skynet and doom all organic life.
The Reapers are harvesting us since:
- they're partly organics, thus need us to "enhance" themselves and replace the eventual losts whilst the Harvests.
- our technological progress could at some point makes us a threat for them.
Modifié par Uncle Jo, 04 juin 2012 - 02:25 .
#30
Posté 04 juin 2012 - 03:44
If that were true, solution 1: Kill us all, hence, negating the need to replinish losses sustained WHILE ATTACKING US.Uncle Jo wrote...
The entire idea was to stop the Reapers to commit genocides every 50,000 years, that exterminate almost all organic life.Ctserber wrote...
The entire idea behind the whole cycle was to stop organics from creating a purely synthetic race that would exterminate all organic life. Thus, the Reapers harvest advanced civilizations before they can create Skynet and doom all organic life.
The Reapers are harvesting us since:
- they're partly organics, thus need us to "enhance" themselves and replace the eventual losts whilst the Harvests.
- our technological progress could at some point makes us a threat for them.
Solution 2: Kill us all, hence, eliminating any possibility of our technology becoming a threat to them.
Solution 3: If they CAN'T kill us all, then harvest us before we get intergalactic travel, and hence, are zero threat to them.
Look, the Catalyst TELLS us that the purpose of the cycles, of the Reapers, is to harvest civilizations before they can create synthetics that will kill them all. That's what he SAYS.
Modifié par Ctserber, 04 juin 2012 - 03:46 .
#31
Posté 04 juin 2012 - 04:00
#32
Posté 04 juin 2012 - 04:19
#33
Posté 04 juin 2012 - 04:26
And that's not even mentioning that the supposed "problem" Synthesis doesn't solve doesn't even exist. Throughout his whole speech I was thinking: "Your welcome to return to Rannoch, Admiral Raan. With us." Just look up, Synthetics and Organic fleets are working together to kill you!
Modifié par Palidane, 04 juin 2012 - 04:26 .
#34
Posté 04 juin 2012 - 04:33

Yo dog
Modifié par GoblinSapper, 04 juin 2012 - 04:33 .
#35
Posté 04 juin 2012 - 06:21
#36
Posté 04 juin 2012 - 06:25
fr33stylez wrote...
How did Shepard sprint like an Olympian into the Synthesis beam when he was injured/limping the whole time?
redbull
#37
Posté 04 juin 2012 - 07:18
He didn't fly up the tube thou.Isichar wrote...
fr33stylez wrote...
How did Shepard sprint like an Olympian into the Synthesis beam when he was injured/limping the whole time?
redbull
The Reapers will probably still kill everyone in the galaxy anyway. Just from orbit now as they can't harvest them anymore. That way the old cycle is still in effect.
#38
Posté 04 juin 2012 - 07:41
i guess the catalyst thought that if everyone was just like the reapers then no more death, pain and strife would occur anymore. he isn't wrong in that regard but as an organic myself i rather prefer my current form thank you very much.
#39
Posté 04 juin 2012 - 08:02
Ctserber wrote...
[...]
It doesn't.
Even if every material is now partially organic (ew... but space magic have no limits afterall...) they will just synthesize them for labor.
Thinking otherwise is just naive... or, well, artistic!
Modifié par LKx, 04 juin 2012 - 08:08 .
#40
Posté 04 juin 2012 - 08:44
I've tried to make sense of that in my thread A different ascension - the Synthesis compendium
But I believe I have put a lot more thought into it than the writers, and my interpretation uses unpublished material, because without that it would be impossible to make sense of it.
Mac Walters' respect for the science in SF was always close to nonexistent. But I'd never have thought they'd go for outright mockery. Note that this is not about the "space magic". Superscience beyond the bounds of what we know is a staple in SF. What gets me is the "new...DNA" and the "final evolution of life".
I don't really mind having to do all the work myself. But I do mind being played for a moron by the writers.
Modifié par Ieldra2, 04 juin 2012 - 08:44 .
#41
Posté 04 juin 2012 - 09:41
In theory, synthesis does not stop post-synthesis species from making new pure synthetics. But synthesis may make this more unlikely.
Of course, I admit, i have to make assumptions and specualtion to make my point and you can blame Bioware for that.
ORGANICS
There are two points here
1) New abilities of organics
My assumption is that synthesis gives organics attributes of synthesis. So that means they can potentially upload download a lot of data and knowledge, consciousness can survive outside his/her body andthe organic may have vastly increased potential for comuting power.
In addition, synthesis may make organics more compatible to body modificationm inclusing cybernetics.
This means they are more capable of doing all activities a synthetic can do themselves.
These new abilities may need extra implants or not. But for this argument, it doesn't matter.
Since organics can potentially compute and act like machines themselves, then there is actually no need to develop more cybernetics.
This actually could lead to some nightmare scenarios where some species enslave organics as zombie servants which have the same capacities of synthetics. They would be like the human lobozomized servitors in Wahammer 40k. And synthesis would facilitate this process.
And I think this may well be one of the legitimate drawbacks of synthesis for organics.
But in effect, since organics can produce these servants, they would not need to develop new synthetics.
And yes, it is just like Brave New World. But not necessarily a positive thing.
2) Relationship with the Geth
Of course, another reason that there is no need to develop new synthetics is because organics can use the Geth.
I believe that organics could simply buy and sell services from the Geth who will still naturally have all the basic features of synthetics still available.
This could be a commercial arrangement or it could also be slavery.
In my view of Synthesis, the Geth would become very individualistic and would develop organic emotions and drives. Geth society would split and be run more closer to an organic society resullting in less consnesus. So many would start to offer services for money. Or they may even enslave other Geth for the organics.
So the end result is possibly that organics don't need to develop new synthetics because they can either 1) use organics for the task or 2) buy services from the Geth.
SYNTHETICS
The Geth would of course not need to develop new synthetics as they have all the advantages of a synthetic themselves. It is more likely that the Geth will produce more post-synthesis Geth.
CONCLUSION
So yes, it is still possible that organics and synthetics could produce more pure synthetics which would rise up and destroy the creators.
But because there would really no need to develop new synthetics, it is less likely to happen.
#42
Posté 04 juin 2012 - 10:32
Sounds logical right?
Who in their right mind among us would advocate it as ethical and reasonable though?
I'm guessing no one. People would try every other alternative.
#43
Posté 04 juin 2012 - 10:39
The Night Mammoth wrote...
To use frylock23's analogy from another thread, what the Catalyst does is roughly equivalent to killing every human on earth to prevent a nuclear winter.
Sounds logical right?
Who in their right mind among us would advocate it as ethical and reasonable though?
I'm guessing no one. People would try every other alternative.
I think you would be surprised at the number of wackos out there.
#44
Posté 04 juin 2012 - 10:42
Asharad Hett wrote...
The Night Mammoth wrote...
To use frylock23's analogy from another thread, what the Catalyst does is roughly equivalent to killing every human on earth to prevent a nuclear winter.
Sounds logical right?
Who in their right mind among us would advocate it as ethical and reasonable though?
I'm guessing no one. People would try every other alternative.
I think you would be surprised at the number of wackos out there.
Maybe, but in comparison to the non-wackos? Negligible.
The very title placed on them doesn't exactly add credibility.
#45
Posté 04 juin 2012 - 10:47
The Night Mammoth wrote...
To use frylock23's analogy from another thread, what the Catalyst does is roughly equivalent to killing every human on earth to prevent a nuclear winter.
Sounds logical right?
Who in their right mind among us would advocate it as ethical and reasonable though?
I'm guessing no one. People would try every other alternative.
Not completely on topic, but I will respond.
Given that we don't actually know what Synthesis does, then your theory could well be true.
In an ME context, synthesis is actiually the equivalent of deliberately exploding a ship packed with Element zero in order to creat children with biotics so humaity could compete with other races. This actually happened in ME canon history.
So deliberate mass manipulation of of this nature has actually happened before in ME. That is how Kaiden got his biotic powers i believe.
Some would say that was beneficial to humanity. But from ME lore, we know that the cost to the individual can be very high.
i belive that is the same thing with regards to Synthesis, just on a much wider level.
#46
Posté 04 juin 2012 - 10:53
Protect organics from synthetics by erasing organics and replacing them with something else? Kinda self defeating...
#47
Posté 04 juin 2012 - 10:58
Motherlander wrote...
The Night Mammoth wrote...
To use frylock23's analogy from another thread, what the Catalyst does is roughly equivalent to killing every human on earth to prevent a nuclear winter.
Sounds logical right?
Who in their right mind among us would advocate it as ethical and reasonable though?
I'm guessing no one. People would try every other alternative.
Not completely on topic, but I will respond.
Given that we don't actually know what Synthesis does, then your theory could well be true.
In an ME context, synthesis is actiually the equivalent of deliberately exploding a ship packed with Element zero in order to creat children with biotics so humaity could compete with other races. This actually happened in ME canon history.
So deliberate mass manipulation of of this nature has actually happened before in ME. That is how Kaiden got his biotic powers i believe.
Some would say that was beneficial to humanity. But from ME lore, we know that the cost to the individual can be very high.
i belive that is the same thing with regards to Synthesis, just on a much wider level.
Sure, I wasn't actually talking about synthesis, just the problem it was trying to solve, the cycles as it were, and the Catalyst's problem. I have a tendancy to focus on that too much.
Synthesis is.......... I don't really know what to make of synthesis.
I mean, I advocate control because of the headcanon possibilities, I don't actually like it. Something about green just doesn't sit right, and it's probably more to do with how completely out-of-the-blue it is. It's a complete unknown, at least with control you have some idea of what you're getting into. I also don't like imposing changes on anyone.
It could be beneficial, or it could be horrendous. What I do know is that it overturns the very foundations of life in its entirety with unknown effects, so it's not something I'm willing to choose. A tad hypocritical given the banner, but that's just how it seems.
#48
Posté 04 juin 2012 - 11:20
In fact, stopping the synthetic-organic "conflict" ("chaos" as the Catalyst calls it) is not the point of any of the endings, as synthetics could eventually still attack again in each of them, regardless of the one you choose...
The point of the Crucible is solving Shepard's problem, not the Catalyst's. It's supposed to stop the Reaper's cycle, that's it...
Every ending does that in its own way, so they work as advertised; they still are not "good" in any practical sense and require more closure and clarity (which they should have given us in the first place) but they do stop the reapers from harvesting everything, at least for now...
Every other problem is beyond the scope of the Crucible...
#49
Posté 04 juin 2012 - 11:26
Pride Demon wrote...
Every other problem is beyond the scope of the Crucible...
But not the Catalyst, which is determining the choice.
#50
Posté 04 juin 2012 - 11:28
Motherlander wrote...
But because there would really no need to develop new synthetics, it is less likely to happen.
I submit to you two good reason why they'd still develop Synthetics. People are both really lazy and really cheap. As a whole that is. EG The original Geth were tools (lazy Quarians





Retour en haut






