Best Defense = One Sword w/ Shield.
Low Damage & Low Defense = Archer.
Never use 2h sword and never will.
Archery is useless?
FALSE
Viglin wrote...
And when your Archer can hit from 200 points up....how is that useless?
Modifié par Baalzie, 11 décembre 2009 - 11:58 .
ExGoldenKnight wrote...
Viglin wrote...
And when your Archer can hit from 200 points up....how is that useless?
In DAO, we fight mostly on tiny room, except in Kochari Wilds of course.
I mean, if you want range damage, Mage is far more better. If you want melee, 2 dagger Rogue.
Baalzie wrote...
My 2h wielding warr=225 damage highest so far all playthroughs...
Dualwield rogue highest hit= 89...
*But then that was before last patch, not played through with fixed dex rogue yet*
True attackspeed is way higher, but oneshotting things is kinda effective... No need for backstabbing or any such just a big friggin 2hmace in the face and *kasplutt*
Lower damage but damn high armorpen...= Elite+ mobs get whacked much more than dualdaggering...
DaeFaron wrote...
Why must it be a 2 dagger rogue? Why must we play for the best character that does the most damage? Why can't we plan for fun, and have a DECENT (note... decent, not the greatest ever) character that doesn't do too shabby in fights?
Modifié par ExGoldenKnight, 12 décembre 2009 - 12:05 .
andyr1986 wrote...
I'm playing an archer at the moment on ahrd.. 32% of party damage...perhaps i'm doing it wrong but i'm really having fun with ranged combat at the moment.
...or Pinning Shot...or Scattershot...or...ChickenDownUnder wrote...
Somebody never got the Arrow of Slaying ability, I see.
Modifié par Baalzie, 12 décembre 2009 - 01:16 .
Modifié par DJoker35, 12 décembre 2009 - 01:18 .