1917 réponses à ce sujet

[djarlaks10]

[Seival]

Kem1995 wrote...

How is this thread still going?

Absolutely  NOBODY agrees with you OP yet your still continuing? 

This is not true. You should read the thread more carefully.

...Besides, I can defend my position even alone.

[estebanus]

Seival wrote...

Kem1995 wrote...

How is this thread still going?

Absolutely  NOBODY agrees with you OP yet your still continuing? 

This is not true. You should read the thread more carefully.

...Besides, I can defend my position even alone.

Ah yes, "defending..."

[djarlaks10]

Seival wrote...

Kem1995 wrote...

How is this thread still going?

Absolutely  NOBODY agrees with you OP yet your still continuing? 

This is not true. You should read the thread more carefully.

...Besides, I can defend my position even alone.

Because it's easy to make some half-assed arguments?

[Arian Dynas]

Uncle Jo wrote...

Arian Dynas wrote...

Uncle Jo wrote...

Sauruz wrote...

Uncle Jo wrote...

estebanus wrote...


It probably won't. The other day, me and a few others' spammed this thread with 8 pages full of half-naked quarians and spiderman pictures, and it didn't work.

Have a little faith... Seriously, it's not very nice, even if this thread doesn't make any sense...

Don't shed tears for the troll.

Oh I wasn't thinking about him. In a sense his thread is popular (although not in the way he probably imagined it), I meant other people who randomly crash in this thread (after a test-flight on BSN) and would like to express their feelings.

Uncle Jo! Here's where you went. We miss you in the IT thread, you've not made an appearance in the longest time!

Arian! Nice to see you! I was quite a long time away from the BSN. Too much work. Today is my first appearance. How many pages did I miss? 200?

500+

[Seival]

djarlaks10 wrote...

Seival wrote...

Kem1995 wrote...

How is this thread still going?

Absolutely  NOBODY agrees with you OP yet your still continuing? 

This is not true. You should read the thread more carefully.

...Besides, I can defend my position even alone.

Because it's easy to make some half-assed arguments?

Because you really should discuss Normandy crash scene here. But somehow I have a feeling that you are discussing me

[M Hedonist]

Seival wrote...

...Besides, I can defend my position even alone.

And with that you mean you can ignore all arguments by yourself, yes?

[D24O]

The whole Normandy scene is too f****** stupid do even try to defend. The EC would do good to just get rid of it.

[djarlaks10]

Seival wrote...

djarlaks10 wrote...

Seival wrote...

Kem1995 wrote...

How is this thread still going?

Absolutely  NOBODY agrees with you OP yet your still continuing? 

This is not true. You should read the thread more carefully.

...Besides, I can defend my position even alone.

Because it's easy to make some half-assed arguments?

Because you really should discuss Normandy crash scene here. But somehow I have a feeling that you are discussing me

well, your entire thread is basically your point of view that you try to show as if BW had intended to do exactly that with the stupid ending. I can do the same, pretending that the entire trilogy was Shep's dream due to the Eden Prime beacon exploding, and, in the end of ME3, when you choose Destroy you can actaully see Shep waking up in a midst of explosion caused by the afore-mentioned Beacon. See, I can do this too, only my level of English isn't that good. 

[Seival]

D24O wrote...

The whole Normandy scene is too f****** stupid do even try to defend. The EC would do good to just get rid of it.

I really doubt this will going to happen.

[djarlaks10]

[M Hedonist]

[estebanus]

estebanus wrote...

Seival wrote...

estebanus wrote...

estebanus wrote...

Answer this question. Don't avoid it.

Seival, please explain the Shepard breath scene. It makes no sense to be there if you think the Normandy went through a test jump, or are we to assume that Shepard was lying half-dead in rubble for the past 25 years?

I believe that "secret ending scene" was called "secret" for reason. This is just an "achievement" for Renegade Shepard, which can be shown even after the titles, or after the Old Man and a Kid scene.

Which it wasn't. Destroy also isn't renegade. It's also not a secret ending scene. In the official Mass effect 3 guide, it is shown as one of the different 16 endings one can get.

If it indeed was secret, it would either play after the credits roll or it would be seen as an easteregg in the official game guide.

[M Hedonist]

[djarlaks10]

[M Hedonist]

[djarlaks10]

[Seival]

djarlaks10 wrote...

Seival wrote...

djarlaks10 wrote...

Seival wrote...

Kem1995 wrote...

How is this thread still going?

Absolutely  NOBODY agrees with you OP yet your still continuing? 

This is not true. You should read the thread more carefully.

...Besides, I can defend my position even alone.

Because it's easy to make some half-assed arguments?

Because you really should discuss Normandy crash scene here. But somehow I have a feeling that you are discussing me

well, your entire thread is basically your point of view that you try to show as if BW had intended to do exactly that with the stupid ending. I can do the same, pretending that the entire trilogy was Shep's dream due to the Eden Prime beacon exploding, and, in the end of ME3, when you choose Destroy you can actaully see Shep waking up in a midst of explosion caused by the afore-mentioned Beacon. See, I can do this too, only my level of English isn't that good. 

You think my level of English is good? I really doubt that... This is not my main language. I learned English a little in the school long, long ago. But that's all. Maybe some of my arguments were misunderstood because of my bad English?

[estebanus]

Where are the jiggly quarian bumbum pictures?

[M Hedonist]

[djarlaks10]

[The Angry One]

Dwailing wrote...

Uh, I don't want to start this argument up, but I should point out that the tree reflections ARE real.  We have the cubemaps to prove it.

Edit: Also, I should point out that, like estebanus said, your opinion is one I can respect even if I don't agree with it.  It reminds me of GBGriffin.

I never said they aren't real. Yes, they are real. However, so is ME2's Ceiling TIM.
It's a graphical oversight due to reuse of assets while forgetting to properly remove all reflections (which doesn't matter since you can only see them with a free camera). Just to compare, you can see Ceiling TIM in a cutscene.

Modifié par The Angry One, 16 juin 2012 - 12:33 .

[M Hedonist]

estebanus wrote...

Where are the jiggly quarian bumbum pictures?

http://www.nerfnow.com/comic/image/248

[djarlaks10]

Seival wrote...

You think my level of English is good? I really doubt that... This is not my main language. I learned English a little in the school long, long ago. But that's all. Maybe some of my arguments were misunderstood because of my bad English?

Nah, I'd say that is because your theory is made of 100% speculation and yet you try to show everyone that is what BW intended to do all along.

[Kem1995]

Nothing you have said has any hard evidence or proof backing the claims up. If we was in court, you'd be laughed at.

I know I jump in at random pages, (why would i follow every page?) I'm sure theres one person that agrees with you, but thats one person. 49 pages are all saying this theory sucks, the other 2 pages? Well, that's all your posts.