It makes sense [Normandy crash scene support thread]
#1276
Posté 16 juin 2012 - 12:33
#1278
Posté 16 juin 2012 - 12:37
djarlaks10 wrote...
Nah, I'd say that is because your theory is made of 100% speculation and yet you try to show everyone that is what BW intended to do all along.Seival wrote...
You think my level of English is good? I really doubt that... This is not my main language. I learned English a little in the school long, long ago. But that's all. Maybe some of my arguments were misunderstood because of my bad English?
Actually the main purpose of this thread is to show support to the scene. I don't want it to be removed from the game. And the theory is just one of possible explanations of the scene. You may agree with it or not, but disagreement must not be represented by inappropriate images.
#1280
Posté 16 juin 2012 - 12:38
Seival wrote...
Actually the main purpose of this thread is to show support to the scene. I don't want it to be removed from the game. And the theory is just one of possible explanations of the scene. You may agree with it or not, but disagreement must not be represented by inappropriate images.
You don't want it removed from the game.
And yet even you want to retcon the bejeezus out of it.
I love it. Nobody likes this scene, not even it's one supporter.
#1281
Posté 16 juin 2012 - 12:39
#1282
Posté 16 juin 2012 - 12:39
It really says something about the strength of your argument when every sentence contains maybe/perhaps/possibly/could/might.
#1283
Posté 16 juin 2012 - 12:40
Well, posting images is somewhat funny. And looking at your previous threads, it seems like you are backing everything in th ending, no matter how stupid it is. Also, why shouldn't this scene be removed from the game since it contains plotholes and makes Joker and your entire squad look like total retards and cowards? Because that's what most people think is shown in this scene.Seival wrote...
Actually the main purpose of this thread is to show support to the scene. I don't want it to be removed from the game. And the theory is just one of possible explanations of the scene. You may agree with it or not, but disagreement must not be represented by inappropriate images.
#1284
Posté 16 juin 2012 - 12:41
#1285
Posté 16 juin 2012 - 12:41
Your theory on the other hand, does not have any of this. Your trying to hard to make something out of nothing.
#1286
Posté 16 juin 2012 - 12:42
I've used Patrick Weekes, Occam's Razor and even freaking Math to prove him wrong.Kem1995 wrote...
Nothing you have said has any hard evidence or proof backing the claims up. If we was in court, you'd be laughed at.
He would be in jail right now if this was in court.
#1287
Posté 16 juin 2012 - 12:44
Trust me, it never went anywhere.
Do something productive instead like me.
#1288
Posté 16 juin 2012 - 12:44
Sauruz wrote...
I've used Patrick Weekes, Occam's Razor and even freaking Math to prove him wrong.Kem1995 wrote...
Nothing you have said has any hard evidence or proof backing the claims up. If we was in court, you'd be laughed at.
He would be in jail right now if this was in court.
He'd be in a psychiatry, if anything!
#1289
Posté 16 juin 2012 - 12:44
Sauruz wrote...
I've used Patrick Weekes, Occam's Razor and even freaking Math to prove him wrong.Kem1995 wrote...
Nothing you have said has any hard evidence or proof backing the claims up. If we was in court, you'd be laughed at.
He would be in jail right now if this was in court.
Math huh? Might have to show me what ya used math on
As for the OP, it's a good thing their not in charge of ME3. They wouldn't take any fan feedback into account because the entire fanbase is telling them, this.theory.sucks.
#1290
Posté 16 juin 2012 - 12:45
#1291
Posté 16 juin 2012 - 12:45
Sauruz wrote...
Stop trying to argue with him already. This thread is 50 pages of people trying to do that.
Trust me, it never went anywhere.
Do something productive instead like me.
DAT ASS
Modifié par Kem1995, 16 juin 2012 - 12:45 .
#1292
Posté 16 juin 2012 - 12:45
Pottumuusi wrote...
Really, take a moment to read through your Q&A.
It really says something about the strength of your argument when every sentence contains maybe/perhaps/possibly/could/might.
That's why it's called theory.
#1293
Posté 16 juin 2012 - 12:46
Seival wrote...
Pottumuusi wrote...
Really, take a moment to read through your Q&A.
It really says something about the strength of your argument when every sentence contains maybe/perhaps/possibly/could/might.
That's why it's called theory.
Theories are often backed up with proof and evidence.
#1294
Posté 16 juin 2012 - 12:46
It's called "It makes sense", only it doesn't make sense.Seival wrote...
Pottumuusi wrote...
Really, take a moment to read through your Q&A.
It really says something about the strength of your argument when every sentence contains maybe/perhaps/possibly/could/might.
That's why it's called theory.
#1296
Posté 16 juin 2012 - 12:46
Seival wrote...
Pottumuusi wrote...
Really, take a moment to read through your Q&A.
It really says something about the strength of your argument when every sentence contains maybe/perhaps/possibly/could/might.
That's why it's called theory.
No, a theory can be backed up by evidence and logical arguments.
What you have is fanfiction.
#1297
Posté 16 juin 2012 - 12:48
The Angry One wrote...
Seival wrote...
Pottumuusi wrote...
Really, take a moment to read through your Q&A.
It really says something about the strength of your argument when every sentence contains maybe/perhaps/possibly/could/might.
That's why it's called theory.
No, a theory can be backed up by evidence and logical arguments.
What you have is fanfiction.
The word "Fanfiction" would be a compliment to this piece of crap.
#1298
Posté 16 juin 2012 - 12:52
The Angry One wrote...
Seival wrote...
Pottumuusi wrote...
Really, take a moment to read through your Q&A.
It really says something about the strength of your argument when every sentence contains maybe/perhaps/possibly/could/might.
That's why it's called theory.
No, a theory can be backed up by evidence and logical arguments.
What you have is fanfiction.
My theory has logical arguments. But most people in this thread prefer not to notice them, because they just want the scene to be removed. And they just want the scene to be removed, because they don't wanna even try to understand it.
#1299
Posté 16 juin 2012 - 12:54
Again, what are your arguments? That explosions on the galaxy map and the one near the Normandy have different sizes? That's one hell of an argument.Seival wrote...
My theory has logical arguments. But most people in this thread prefer not to notice them, because they just want the scene to be removed. And they just want the scene to be removed, because they don't wanna even try to understand it.
#1300
Posté 16 juin 2012 - 12:54
The possibility that his theory turns out to be true is virtually zero.Kem1995 wrote...
Math huh? Might have to show me what ya used math on
Needless to say, he hasn't responded.





Retour en haut





