1917 réponses à ce sujet

[Kem1995]

The scene isn't going to get removed, people who want that to happen better stop wishing.

I don't mind the scene, as long as it's explaiend thats all. But not with your theory. You need to accept the fact that nobody likes this theory, it's not even a theory it's speuclation. A large speculation.

If you had more evidence and proof explaining your "logical arguements", people would reconsider and take your theory more serious.

And also, again I repeat the green coloured explosion. Have you come up with a better answer than there may be a green relay like the Omega 4 relay?

Modifié par Kem1995, 16 juin 2012 - 12:55 .

[estebanus]

Seival wrote...



My theory has logical arguments.

My god. You're...You're not being serious, right? Right?

[D24O]

Seival wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

Seival wrote...

Pottumuusi wrote...

Really, take a moment to read through your Q&A.

It really says something about the strength of your argument when every sentence contains maybe/perhaps/possibly/could/might.

That's why it's called theory.

No, a theory can be backed up by evidence and logical arguments.
What you have is fanfiction.

My theory has logical arguments. But most people in this thread prefer not to notice them, because they just want the scene to be removed. And they just want the scene to be removed, because they don't wanna even try to understand it.

I'm not goin got waste time trying to understand something that's as stupid as the Normandy scene, especially with the EC coming out.

[Uncle Jo]

Seival wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

Seival wrote...

Pottumuusi wrote...

Really, take a moment to read through your Q&A.

It really says something about the strength of your argument when every sentence contains maybe/perhaps/possibly/could/might.

That's why it's called theory.

No, a theory can be backed up by evidence and logical arguments.
What you have is fanfiction.

My theory has logical arguments. But most people in this thread prefer not to notice them, because they just want the scene to be removed. And they just want the scene to be removed, because they don't wanna even try to understand it.

You have nothing but your own imagination to back up your "theory". Nothing. Not with that much we can see after Shep made his choice.
Let's assume just one sec that your theory could be true (no, it's still too much). Don't you think that BW would have showed us something slightly more important (like the aftermath of the Earth Battle, the fate of the different races, the consequences of your choices...) than a stupid flight-test?

Modifié par Uncle Jo, 16 juin 2012 - 01:02 .

[djarlaks10]

Btw, every page needs some spidey.

[Kem1995]

Uncle Jo wrote...

Seival wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

Seival wrote...

Pottumuusi wrote...

Really, take a moment to read through your Q&A.

It really says something about the strength of your argument when every sentence contains maybe/perhaps/possibly/could/might.

That's why it's called theory.

No, a theory can be backed up by evidence and logical arguments.
What you have is fanfiction.

My theory has logical arguments. But most people in this thread prefer not to notice them, because they just want the scene to be removed. And they just want the scene to be removed, because they don't wanna even try to understand it.

You have nothing but your own imagination to back up your "theory". Nothing. Not with that much we can see after Shep made his choice.
Let's assume just one sec that your theory could be true (no, it's still too much). Don't you think that BW would have showed us something slightly more important (like the aftermath of the Earth Battle, the faith of the different races, the consequences of your choices...) than a stupid flight-test?

This.. This so much. Especially the stupid flight test part.

[Uncle Jo]

djarlaks10 wrote...

Btw, every page needs some spidey.

*great pic related to the thread and backing it up removed*

Keep up the good work

Modifié par Uncle Jo, 16 juin 2012 - 01:01 .

[Seival]

D24O wrote...

Seival wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

Seival wrote...

Pottumuusi wrote...

Really, take a moment to read through your Q&A.

It really says something about the strength of your argument when every sentence contains maybe/perhaps/possibly/could/might.

That's why it's called theory.

No, a theory can be backed up by evidence and logical arguments.
What you have is fanfiction.

My theory has logical arguments. But most people in this thread prefer not to notice them, because they just want the scene to be removed. And they just want the scene to be removed, because they don't wanna even try to understand it.

I'm not goin got waste time trying to understand something that's as stupid as the Normandy scene, especially with the EC coming out.

Well, yes, you can just wait till EC which will explain you everything. But I think it's much more interesting to try to understand the scene before the EC.

[Kem1995]

Seival wrote...

D24O wrote...

Seival wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

Seival wrote...

Pottumuusi wrote...

Really, take a moment to read through your Q&A.

It really says something about the strength of your argument when every sentence contains maybe/perhaps/possibly/could/might.

That's why it's called theory.

No, a theory can be backed up by evidence and logical arguments.
What you have is fanfiction.

My theory has logical arguments. But most people in this thread prefer not to notice them, because they just want the scene to be removed. And they just want the scene to be removed, because they don't wanna even try to understand it.

I'm not goin got waste time trying to understand something that's as stupid as the Normandy scene, especially with the EC coming out.

Well, yes, you can just wait till EC which will explain you everything. But I think it's much more interesting to try to understand the scene before the EC.

Way to answer to the post that doesn't question your theory as much as the other 4-5 posts did. Wtf?

[djarlaks10]

Seival wrote...
Well, yes, you can just wait till EC which will explain you everything. But I think it's much more interesting to try to understand the scene before the EC.

I thought that nearly everyone came to the conclusion that this scene, as well as the majority of the ending, doesn't make any sense and is full of space magic and plotholes. See, you are late to the party.

[Kem1995]

Even if this theory was true, why would they be doing a test run? For what? Why is the colour explosion causing the Normandy to malfunction? Why is the colour the same colour as the choice I chose? How did the Normandy get to a new planet god knows where if all the relays exploded. How can they perform a test run without relays? Someone, help! D:

[djarlaks10]

Kem1995 wrote...

Even if this theory was true, why would they be doing a test run? For what?

For teh lulz.

[jkflipflopDAO]

I can't get behind this. I applaud you for trying to polish a turd, though.

[Kem1995]

I'm gonna go play MP. This theory stinks <_<

[D24O]

Seival wrote...


Well, yes, you can just wait till EC which will explain you everything. But I think it's much more interesting to try to understand the scene before the EC.

Nah, that implies there is value present in the scene, I think it's just a waste of disc space until we get a canon source to tell us what really happens to the crew. You and I don't have the same legitamacy as the BW loremasters hence any speculation we make up won't feel right. At least that's how I see it.

[KevShep]

Kem1995 wrote...

The scene isn't going to get removed, people who want that to happen better stop wishing.

I don't mind the scene, as long as it's explaiend thats all. But not with your theory. You need to accept the fact that nobody likes this theory, it's not even a theory it's speuclation. A large speculation.

If you had more evidence and proof explaining your "logical arguements", people would reconsider and take your theory more serious.

And also, again I repeat the green coloured explosion. Have you come up with a better answer than there may be a green relay like the Omega 4 relay?

 I dont really know what you guys are back and fourth about but I would just like to say that everyting that is played in that last bits of cut scenes is things that Shepard HAS already experienced.

-Liara says to Shepard (before the fight for earth) that "A ship can get lost out there could it?"(she says this as they look to space).

- Relays blowing up...nuf said!

-Normandy out runing an explostion.

-Normandy blowing up and crashing.

-The world that they land on has the same moons as the quairan home world...a world by the way that symbolizes HOPE( the whole last bit is about hope after all).

-The relays first start to explode in the same system as arrival( IT WAS NOT SOL THAT IT SHOWS)...hint hint hint!

Modifié par KevShep, 16 juin 2012 - 01:31 .

[djarlaks10]

Well, it looks like it's getting stagnant atm. Unless the discussion picks up in a couple of minutes, I'm going to bed. In the meantime :

[Erield]

estebanus wrote...

If you all wanna see a real theory, check this out!

Kai Leng support thread? Nice!

Modifié par Erield, 16 juin 2012 - 01:44 .

[D24O]

estebanus wrote...

If you all wanna see a real theory, check this out!

Kai Leng support thread? Nice!

I support this support thread.

[shteuyn]

So in one scene the mass relays are destroyed...and in the next scene they have been rebuilt?

wow

That would make as much sense as if in the next scene we destroyed the mass relays and in the next they were rebuilt.
wait, what?

[KevShep]

shteuyn wrote...

So in one scene the mass relays are destroyed...and in the next scene they have been rebuilt?

wow

That would make as much sense as if in the next scene we destroyed the mass relays and in the next they were rebuilt.
wait, what?

[shteuyn]

KevShep wrote...

shteuyn wrote...

So in one scene the mass relays are destroyed...and in the next scene they have been rebuilt?

wow

That would make as much sense as if in the next scene we destroyed the mass relays and in the next they were rebuilt.
wait, what?

Its the relay we destroyed in arrival?

[KevShep]

shteuyn wrote...

KevShep wrote...

shteuyn wrote...

So in one scene the mass relays are destroyed...and in the next scene they have been rebuilt?

wow

That would make as much sense as if in the next scene we destroyed the mass relays and in the next they were rebuilt.
wait, what?

Its the relay we destroyed in arrival?

Yes...the first relay that blows up is supposed to be sol but not in the next scene, its arrival's relay which is already destroyed.

Modifié par KevShep, 16 juin 2012 - 01:41 .

[sH0tgUn jUliA]

Have I mentioned my "theory" in this thread yet? I don't remember if I have or not. If I have, too bad. I'm claiming "senior moment." I'm 60.

My "theory" is that the plot hole of destruction... wait I think I mentioned plot hole of suckage.... but I've refined it since then...

Okay more serious, now.

1) I have figured out that Harbinger is responsible for the wardrobe malfunction near the beam after the laser blast. You know when your expensive 50,000 CR custom armor you bought at a store on the Citadel suddenly changes to charred default N7 armor? Yeah, that one. He sent his minions out to change your armor and stole it.

2) Then all of your squad mates got aboard Harbinger who left immediately after you regained consciousness after the laser blast. Harbinger docked with the Normandy allowing all of your squad mates to board the Normandy, and then bid farewell to Joker and team. This explains how your team got aboard the Normandy, and why Harbinger stopped guarding the entrance to the beam to WTF land.

3) Now after Shepard activates the Crucible it emits this wave. In the immediate vicinity of the Citadel are four Reaper capital ships and an Allied dreadnought. You will observe in the videos that these are blown to hell. That's what Joker sees looking out the side window of the Normandy -- actually he has a mirror near that allows him to see out the window on that side of the bridge, and there is a window there. He's thinking "**** **** ****." So he fires the engines up.

4) Now Joker would like to FTL to the relay but the fleet is in the way and as we know from the codex one cannot FTL if there is something in the way, and one must set a destination. I imagine Joker just kicks in the afterburners on the Normandy's thrusters and they're accellerating as fast as they can trying to clear the debris field so they can go FTL, but the wave is catching up to them.

So at the last second he punches in a random set of coordinates, you know the "anywhere but here" coordinates, goes FTL just as the wave hits them and shears off the back end of the ship, but this also transports them to this planet. We only know where the bow and midship part of the ship crash landed. We don't know where the stern of the ship landed.

Out come three team members, but there are others on board who are still pulling themselves out from under the debris: Like Spc. Traynor, Dr. Michel or Chakwas, etc., and various members of the crew. James, Steve, Tali, Diana Allers, Gabby and Ken, Daniels, and others are somewhere else, and we just don't know where (hint: stern part of the ship).

Of course, due to the vacuum of space and sudden decompression, everyone is dead, but that's another upcoming BioWare title altogether called "Where The F*** Are We? Part 1: The landing". This game will be published sometime in the Spring of 2013. You'll get to roll up one of the ship's crew: you know those people who were sitting at a console? One of those people.

Modifié par sH0tgUn jUliA, 16 juin 2012 - 01:52 .

[shteuyn]

KevShep wrote...

Yes...the first relay that blows up is supposed to be sol but not in the next scene, its arrival's relay which is already destroyed.

Aaargh...cant...wrap my head around this...
What the balls is Bioware trying to say with this?