1917 réponses à ce sujet

[Seival]

The Night Mammoth wrote...

I'm still waiting for you to make more assumptions to try and cover up the glaring flaw in the point I made earlier.

Can you repeat it please? It's really hard to track everything here alone.

[The Night Mammoth]

Seival wrote...

The Night Mammoth wrote...

I'm still waiting for you to make more assumptions to try and cover up the glaring flaw in the point I made earlier.

Can you repeat it please? It's really hard to track everything here alone.

No. 

[M Hedonist]

Seival wrote...

The Night Mammoth wrote...

I'm still waiting for you to make more assumptions to try and cover up the glaring flaw in the point I made earlier.

Can you repeat it please? It's really hard to track everything here alone.

Just to get this straight - when others bring up arguments you've already answered you refuse to repeat yourself, but now you tell others to repeat themselves because you're too lazy to search the thread yourself?
My goddamn Spidey senses are tingling.

[The Night Mammoth]

Seival wrote...

...You keep proving that you just don't wanna analize.

And that makes you a hypocrite. 

Good day.

[iHorizons]

Yep keeping avoid my questions and points Seival they only make your "theory" more believable

Modifié par iHorizons, 16 juin 2012 - 08:40 .

[Seival]

The Night Mammoth wrote...

Seival wrote...

The Night Mammoth wrote...

I'm still waiting for you to make more assumptions to try and cover up the glaring flaw in the point I made earlier.

Can you repeat it please? It's really hard to track everything here alone.

No. 

Then I will search some replies of yours that I might miss only when I have a time for this.

[iHorizons]

Sauruz wrote...

Seival wrote...

The Night Mammoth wrote...

I'm still waiting for you to make more assumptions to try and cover up the glaring flaw in the point I made earlier.

Can you repeat it please? It's really hard to track everything here alone.

Just to get this straight - when others bring up arguments you've already answered you refuse to repeat yourself, but now you tell others to repeat themselves because you're too lazy to search the thread yourself?
My goddamn Spidey senses are tingling.

This thread needs a dancing black spider man gif

[iHorizons]

Seival if you don't answer my questions my spidey sense may begin to tingle

[Grimwick]

Seival wrote...

Grimwick wrote...

Seival wrote...

Grimwick wrote...

Btw Seival I was just reading through your FAQ (not much of an FAQ if your answers are all incorrect) when I noticed that the point you make in 'clue' 3 contradicts the evidence presented in 'clue' 1.

You claim it's not persistent as evidence that it is s different explosion? No - the lack of persistence matches the shockwave shown in the first picture.

In fact, I don't think any of your clues make any coherent sense.

No conflict there actually.

Clue #1 shows Relays' explosions, which have to be the same as Crucible's, or there was absolutely no point in them. These explosions do the same thing a the Crucible's explosion, but in different systems (to cover the entire galaxy and affect all invaded Reapers).

So, Relays' explosions are massive in size and persistent. Which means, that the entire space behind the Normandy (see Clue #2) should  be filled by the giant shockwave. And the shockwave frond had to be flat and persistent, but it's not (see Clue #3).

...Reading your comments, I just see a proof, that most people here just don't want to try to understand what are they reading. I'm not surprise that you are still so confused with the scene.

In your picture of clue 1 you can actually see that the shockwaves are not persistent. The inside of the ring of the shockwave is empty. Your argument that because the normandy shockwave in your other clue isn't persistent it is a different explosion is completely wrong. It is based on no evidence because the evidence you have provided contradicts itself.

They are massive in size, sure, but it is an irrelevant point because the shockwave is only as big as the wave front. Because only a small portion of the wavefront can pass through the mass relay at any one time then I don't see how declaring that it is too small makes any sense.

...Reading your comments I just see proof that you are an arrogant pro-ender/supporter who rejects all visible evidence against your own ideas and instead declare yourself the 'only person who can see it'.

There was no point in non-volumetric explosions. They have to cover volume, not a surface. It's the Space, remember? It was not a "ring" it was a sphere (which was not empty inside), but just shown as a ring as if it was on the galaxy map "UI".

...You keep proving that you just don't wanna analize.

LOL so how on Earth is that justifying your theory?

Besides - if you read what I said I mentioned that only a portion of the wavefront is transported through the relay. We can see that - hence it being non-persistent as evidence for your cause is garbage.


http://imageshack.us...4/fail1ul.png/ 

And I have no idea what you are harping on about.  You can clearly see a non-persistent shockwave spreading out, volumetrically.

...You keep proving that you can't analyse.

Modifié par Grimwick, 16 juin 2012 - 08:55 .

[Uncle Jo]

The Night Mammoth wrote...

Seival wrote...

The Night Mammoth wrote...

I'm still waiting for you to make more assumptions to try and cover up the glaring flaw in the point I made earlier.

Can you repeat it please? It's really hard to track everything here alone.

No. 

LOL.

[djarlaks10]

iHorizons wrote...

Seival if you don't answer my questions my spidey sense may begin to tingle

I'm ready whenever you are.

[M Hedonist]

Grimwick wrote...

http://desmond.image...png&res=landing

Fixed.
You have to add [img ] and [/img ] directly before and after the image url. No gaps inbetween.
Edit: Actually, there was a problem with the image url; you used the url of a page containing the picture, not the actual url of the picture.

Modifié par Sauruz, 16 juin 2012 - 10:24 .

[M Hedonist]

djarlaks10 wrote...

iHorizons wrote...

Seival if you don't answer my questions my spidey sense may begin to tingle

I'm ready whenever you are.

[djarlaks10]

[Kem1995]

iHorizons wrote...

Seival if you don't answer my questions my spidey sense may begin to tingle

ANSWER THEIR DAMN QUESTIONS!

[M Hedonist]

[djarlaks10]

Modifié par djarlaks10, 16 juin 2012 - 10:36 .

[M Hedonist]

[djarlaks10]

[M Hedonist]

[djarlaks10]

[M Hedonist]

[Liber320]

I love this thread so much, I might just have sex with it

[djarlaks10]

[M Hedonist]