1917 réponses à ce sujet

[AresKeith]

HYR 2.0 wrote...

Gotta love how everyone here likes to call out Seival for being a troll...

... then proceed to bump/troll his threads zealously.

I see The Angry One school of trolling is still strong with us, even if she's gone. ("It's not trolling if *I* do it!")

Why so serious?

[teh DRUMPf!!]

AresKeith wrote...

HYR 2.0 wrote...

Gotta love how everyone here likes to call out Seival for being a troll...

... then proceed to bump/troll his threads zealously.

I see The Angry One school of trolling is still strong with us, even if she's gone. ("It's not trolling if *I* do it!")

Why so serious?

I've just never liked the schoolyard-bullying on this forum. Kind of hypocritical, IMO.

[AresKeith]

HYR 2.0 wrote...

AresKeith wrote...

HYR 2.0 wrote...

Gotta love how everyone here likes to call out Seival for being a troll...

... then proceed to bump/troll his threads zealously.

I see The Angry One school of trolling is still strong with us, even if she's gone. ("It's not trolling if *I* do it!")

Why so serious?

I've just never liked the schoolyard-bullying on this forum. Kind of hypocritical, IMO.

So you try to scold them about schoolyard-bullying when Seival (and Wulf) calls people delusional for disagreeing with them

[HiddenInWar]

If the world ends, and the internet ceases to exist, I want this one single thread to still exist for aliens to find millions of years from now.

[HiddenInWar]

anorling wrote...


This... thread... I wish you could see it like I do. It's so... perfect...

This is arguably the greatest comment on here

[MassivelyEffective0730]

HYR 2.0 wrote...

Gotta love how everyone here likes to call out Seival for being a troll...

... then proceed to bump/troll his threads zealously.

I see The Angry One school of trolling is still strong with us, even if she's gone. ("It's not trolling if *I* do it!")

Part of it is trolling perhaps. But most of it is calling out Seival on having no evidence or narrative support all for his theories. 

That alone isn't the problem. The problem is how he tries to argue that it is objective fact, and insults other posters for not believing his theories and calls them deluded and unable to see the truth.

[teh DRUMPf!!]

AresKeith wrote...

So you try to scold them about schoolyard-bullying when Seival (and Wulf) calls people delusional for disagreeing with them

Don't kid yourself. There's way more than just simple "disagreeing" going on here. A lot of people are calling names, ridiculing, and otherwise flat-out trolling in response to his posts/threads.

At that point, you kind of lose your right to complain about how he responds to you. Ya can't have it both ways.

I've never seen Seival to be nearly the same level insulting as people posting here in response to him, for that matter.


Let him have his "delusions." What do you care, really?

Modifié par HYR 2.0, 28 avril 2013 - 08:00 .

[AresKeith]

HYR 2.0 wrote...

AresKeith wrote...

So you try to scold them about schoolyard-bullying when Seival (and Wulf) calls people delusional for disagreeing with them

Don't kid yourself. There's way more than just simple "disagreeing" going on here. A lot of people are calling names, ridiculing, and otherwise flat-out trolling in response to his posts/threads.

At that point, you kind of lose your right to complain about how he responds to you. Ya can't have it both ways.

I've never seen Seival to be nearly the same level insulting as people posting here in response to him, for that matter.


Let him have his delusions. What do you care, really?

What I was saying is that if your gonna try to scold them your gonna have to scold Seival also

And if you never seen Seival do insulting then you obviously do look enough or care

[estebanus]

Oh god, they resurrected this thread... again!

[teh DRUMPf!!]

AresKeith wrote...

What I was saying is that if your gonna try to scold them your gonna have to scold Seival also

And if you never seen Seival do insulting then you obviously do look enough or care

You're telling me that he's condescending, in response to others. That tells me who the problem is here. So really now, why are you bothering to talk to him if his responses anger you so much? Why are other people? It's obvious what's going on here: Seival-bashing is a fun. Can't get the joy of trolling him if we just ignore his posts.

As for Seival himself, the worst I've seen is passive-aggressiveness. Maybe he's done worse. Guess what? It doesn't matter!! Like I said, ya can't have it both ways. You're only responsible for you, not for me/him/her/it/them.

I need not read this thread or posts in it. I've been around this forum long enough to know exactly what's going on here, or anywhere else. BSN is plagued by tyranny-of-the-majority (opinion) and God help you if you dare go against the grain.

I typically say nothing when I see it because frankly, this place is just hopeless. However, bumping this thread in the name of piling on humiliation? That's uncalled for, and it's appalling how many are content on joining in.

Modifié par HYR 2.0, 28 avril 2013 - 08:24 .

[Archonsg]

Nah, I just find it amusing to see, again, how Sevial and Auld Wolf pat themselves and each other on thier backs for being astute enough to be able to see symbolism where others do not.

Occam's razor however would suggest that it's was simply bad visual direction that stemmed from bad writing.

The entire thing was just simply an attempt to wow the player with drama that just weren't thought out.
No deeper meaning behind it.

[dreamgazer]

HYR 2.0 wrote...

Let him have his "delusions." What do you care, really?

You think they "care"? Heh. I'd be disappointed if I couldn't read such things.

Hitting that "Submit" button willfully makes your delusions open to the public, though. If you want to keep your delusions safe, tuck 'em away in the back of your mind.

[Village_Idiot]

Oh God, who resurrected this abomination?

[MassivelyEffective0730]

Seems like most of the people who keep posting about "why did you resurrect this" don't realize that they themselves are bumping it.

[Tinu]

Even though this thread turned into a joke, I have a question for the OP.

If it happened let's say 20 years later, why would they still wear the same outfits?

[HiddenInWar]

Seival wrote...

Q: Why didn't Shepard exit the Normandy after crash in case of 4000 EMS Destroy ending?
A: She could have some other important tasks on the Earth for example. Or she is just inside the Normandy, and planned to exit later.

Important tasks, like say, trying to find the normandy? (provided shepard wasn't in the crash according to your theory)

[HiddenInWar]

Seival wrote...

Stornskar wrote...

Why would Javik take part in a test flight years later? With Shepard gone and the Reapers ... uh whatever they are, he would probably want to die alone somewhere. And why in the world would the explosion be the same color as the Synthesis/Control/Destroy option?

Those questions were already answered:

 - Javik could change his mind about the suicide.
 - Shockwave color could be some long-term post-effect of Crucuble's explosion.

Even when travelling at that amount of speed? 

Modifié par HiddenInWar, 01 juin 2013 - 04:54 .