210 réponses à ce sujet

[Zjarcal]

Grimy Bunyip wrote...

eagle I more DPS than predator X now!

Ok, quoting again because after lookig at the rate of fire stats, I still think the Eagle I has less DPS than a Predator X, given that the Predator's rate of fire is 500, while the Eagle's one is 400.

Modifié par Zjarcal, 05 juin 2012 - 09:13 .

[Kalas Magnus]

Air Quotes wrote...

Didn't dare to touch Reegar or Krysae since a lot of the people haven't unlocked them yet

The ones that have are already speed run records. Then anyone watching the videos will try to mimic and thats all anyone will use.

[astheoceansblue]

Underwhelming...

[Techo Angel]

nothing about fixing the OPed Reeger or the Phoenix's broken Fitness :/

[Rifneno]

Kalas321 wrote...

Air Quotes wrote...

Didn't dare to touch Reegar or Krysae since a lot of the people haven't unlocked them yet

The ones that have are already speed run records. Then anyone watching the videos will try to mimic and thats all anyone will use.

Don't worry, Chicken Little.  The sky isn't really falling.

[Pitznik]

Air Quotes wrote...

Didn't dare to touch Reegar or Krysae since a lot of the people haven't unlocked them yet

That totally explains Harrier slight nerf.

[Mozts]

Like the changes. Missing some Revenant damage buff.(wasn't it supposed to tear things apart?)

Nerfing the Harrier may be a right call after all. Only affects level X and there is a lot of characters with AR weight reduction.

Reegar shredder and headshots needs to go. AP ammo is consumable, so I guess its reasonable to have it. Can they do that with a balance change or a patch is required?

Techo Angel wrote...

nothing about fixing the OPed Reeger or the Phoenix's broken Fitness :/

 

Phoenix Shields is fine. Health still untested, but I'm guessing Fitness is working as it should.

This thing is turning in to HOAX...

Modifié par Mozts, 05 juin 2012 - 09:13 .

[john-in-france]

WTH!

You nerfed the Harrier...the only decent AR in the game so far! It already had hideous weight issues....grumbles about Eagle favoritism....

[Aiiro]

The Krysae does not need to be 'nerfed' as it takes a whole clip to kill a target, generally. it also doesn't always hit the target, either.

and the buff to the eagle is nice, I love using that little guy.

[Kalas Magnus]

Rifneno wrote...

Kalas321 wrote...

Air Quotes wrote...

Didn't dare to touch Reegar or Krysae since a lot of the people haven't unlocked them yet

The ones that have are already speed run records. Then anyone watching the videos will try to mimic and thats all anyone will use.

Don't worry, Chicken Little.  The sky isn't really falling.

It's frustrating that it outshines the black widow and bypasses shield gate.

[BooBooZX]

I find the harrier weight odd....seeing how almost nobody (should) have it at 10 yet.

[Killmoves37]

They need to buff the Assault Rifles more
90% of them are pure booty

[rmccowen]

ShadedPhoenix wrote...

so much for the hopes of someday getting a nice ar worthy for caster...

That's what the Phaeston is for.

No, I'm being serious: my AJA packs one and I love it. Try it.

[molecularman]

john-in-france wrote...

WTH!

You nerfed the Harrier...the only decent AR in the game so far! It already had hideous weight issues....grumbles about Eagle favoritism....

Now look into your soul... Was it really that horrible change? Will it affect you in any way? No?

[chcknwng]

molecularman wrote...

Looks like krysae and reegar will stay as they are, lol

Haha. Kinda interesting for my precious eagle.

[Grimy Bunyip]

Zjarcal wrote...

Grimy Bunyip wrote...

eagle I more DPS than predator X now!

Ok, quoting again because after lookig at the rate of fire stats, I still think the Eagle I has less DPS than a Predator X, given that the Predator's rate of fire is 500, while the Eagle's one is 400.

i factor in 0.04 refire for human error.
it's possible to get more dps with predator than eagle, but essentially impossible.
it's not within human capability to get refire error under 0.04 for most people.

Modifié par Grimy Bunyip, 05 juin 2012 - 09:20 .

[heybigmoney]

Lol what??? Harrier gets nerfs but reegar death ray and krysae missle launcher are the same? Are you guys taking crazy pills???

[A Wild Snorlax]

After these new changes I think it's pretty safe to assume the people doing the balancing don't actually play their own game, I'm guessing they are playing yatzi and using dice throws to decide what gets balanced and what doesn't.

[whalewhisker]

Why would they increase the weight on the Harrier? It's an Ultra Rare so it's not like we're going to be lowering its weight anytime soon...

They really want us to hate assault rifles. >.>

[molecularman]

Grimy Bunyip wrote...

Zjarcal wrote...

Grimy Bunyip wrote...

eagle I more DPS than predator X now!

Ok, quoting again because after lookig at the rate of fire stats, I still think the Eagle I has less DPS than a Predator X, given that the Predator's rate of fire is 500, while the Eagle's one is 400.

i factor in 0.03 refire for human error.
it's possible to get more dps with predator than eagle, but essentially impossible.
it's not within human capability to get refire error under 0.04 for most people.

Autohotkey says hello

Okay, not many people use macros and even they aren't perfect. So no argument here

[nuculerman]

...
...
...
...

Out of the three DLC weapons, you chose to nerf the Harrier? The first well balanced assault rifle? The well balanced AR that will take most of us forever to get at a high level? When the Reegar I can kill an Atlas in like 5 seconds with the right mods? When the Krysae I is basically a Valiant I (which is arguably OP) that lands free head shots and does splash damage with NO AIMING. YOU CHOSE THE HARRIER?????????

I know, I know. They only nerfed the weight progression. My Harrier I was unaffected. But still. It's the damn principle of the thing. I feel like Bioware dev team just trolls us.

[Rifneno]

I don't think the harrier nerf was at all justified. The harrier is just a non-carpal tunnel inducing mattock for people without turbo controllers or keyboard/mouse macros. It was already paying a mighty high price for being automatic before this since it was already heavier, 2 rarity classes higher, and has a sad ammo reserve.

[Controllerfreak]

sweet, I already liked the eagle, now its even better.

[Grimy Bunyip]

molecularman wrote...
Autohotkey says hello

Okay, not many people use macros and even they aren't perfect. So no argument here

I've tested autohotkey autoclickers.
they can't get under 0.035 refire loss either.

[FataliTensei]

swjobson wrote...

I think the developers hate assault rifles.