Aller au contenu

Photo

June 5 Multiplayer Balance Changes


210 réponses à ce sujet

#76
Atheosis

Atheosis
  • Members
  • 3 519 messages

nuculerman wrote...

Barneyk wrote...

whalewhisker wrote...

It's an ultra rare. That's balance enough.


I disagree, look at the Paladin, look at the Black Widow, look at the Javelin, they are ultra rare but they also have the drawback of being heavy and with limited ammo.


Yeah... that would be because their burst damage is outrageous.  Your comparison is meaningless.


Err...the Harrier's burst damage is extremely good as well you know...

#77
Killmoves37

Killmoves37
  • Members
  • 171 messages

Barneyk wrote...

whalewhisker wrote...

It's an ultra rare. That's balance enough.


I disagree, look at the Paladin, look at the Black Widow, look at the Javelin, they are ultra rare but they also have the drawback of being heavy and with limited ammo.

Thats more because they're snipers and pistols. Assault Rifles should have more ammo

#78
CaptainAchilles

CaptainAchilles
  • Members
  • 242 messages

Ankarah wrote...

how dare they make my life better by buffing the eagle!


lol

#79
audicdm

audicdm
  • Members
  • 183 messages
Harrier weight nerf? Really? Where's the spare ammo increase that it needs?

#80
-Severian-

-Severian-
  • Members
  • 593 messages

Atheosis wrote...

Republic190 wrote...

Thanks Eric, the Eagle is a lot better now. :)


It's still pretty terrible though.


QFT

#81
Bhatair

Bhatair
  • Members
  • 3 749 messages
Hah, that's hilarious. Bioware offices are singing along to the the trolololol song.

#82
A Wild Snorlax

A Wild Snorlax
  • Members
  • 3 056 messages
Harrier was already balanced, it's ammo capacity is god awful. Whoever is responsible for these balance changes must be smoking weed and randomly smashing their heads into the keyboards, to quote the exiled wesus.

#83
SinerAthin

SinerAthin
  • Members
  • 2 742 messages
I'm glad to see no terrible nerfs but only buffs, mainly, but... why did they nerf the Cerberus Harrier?

It wasn't OP, it was the only semi-usable Assault RIfle in the game... was that a crime? :<

Modifié par SinerAthin, 05 juin 2012 - 10:18 .


#84
Permafrost27

Permafrost27
  • Members
  • 191 messages
No Damage Reduction on the Krysae bums me out.

Is the official stance really that it's balanced and functioning properly?

Modifié par Permafrost27, 05 juin 2012 - 10:18 .


#85
Grumpy Old Wizard

Grumpy Old Wizard
  • Members
  • 2 581 messages
I was hoping for some buffs for some of the underutilized/underpowered classes. :(

#86
SinerAthin

SinerAthin
  • Members
  • 2 742 messages

Permafrost27 wrote...

No Damage Reduction on the Krysae bums me out.

Is the official stance really that it's balanced and functioning properly?


The only adjust the Krysae needs is to gain less + damage from Tactical Cloak.

Perhaps Reegar could do with the same. Remove some of its damage bonuses from cloak but leave the gun itself alone, and it'd been perfect.

#87
Pride Demon

Pride Demon
  • Members
  • 1 342 messages
These changes actually don't touch me, as I have neither of those guns...
Though given how huch people asked for an Eagle buff I'd tentatively say this is good news, right?

Bhatair wrote...

Hah, that's hilarious. Bioware offices are singing along to the the trolololol song.

Perhaps they wanted to honour the singer...
RIP Eduard Khil... ;(

#88
Zso_Zso

Zso_Zso
  • Members
  • 775 messages

D.Shepard wrote...

An increase of Harrier weight is much better than all the nerfs the "nerfers" asked for Krysae and Reegar.


^^^ THIS !!! ^^^

I love how the nerfers got nerfed :o

:wub: BioWare!

#89
billy the squid

billy the squid
  • Members
  • 4 669 messages

Air Quotes wrote...

Didn't dare to touch Reegar or Krysae since a lot of the people haven't unlocked them yet


But they increased the encumbrance of the ultra rare Harrier because? ...lots of people have it? Counter intuative logic at work there.

#90
Cuddlezarro

Cuddlezarro
  • Members
  • 5 327 messages
since they nerfed the damn things weight for no reason they should buff the harriers spare ammo to compensate =/

#91
Zardoc

Zardoc
  • Members
  • 3 570 messages
So the new Adept (and to an extent the Vanguard) shall remain largely useless for now, huh?

#92
Pride Demon

Pride Demon
  • Members
  • 1 342 messages

A Wild Snorlax wrote...

Harrier was already balanced, it's ammo capacity is god awful. Whoever is responsible for these balance changes must be smoking weed and randomly smashing their heads into the keyboards, to quote the exiled wesus.

Unless s/he was banned again, I can tell you Wesus isn't exiled...
I saw him/her post a few weeks back in another thread, that got me really confused as to what those "remember Wesus" banners were supposed to be for... :/

#93
Atheosis

Atheosis
  • Members
  • 3 519 messages

Grumpy Old Wizard wrote...

I was hoping for some buffs for some of the underutilized/underpowered classes. :(


Indeed.  The Female Quarian Engineer is left in the deep dark pit of uselessness for yet another week...

#94
Poison_Berrie

Poison_Berrie
  • Members
  • 2 205 messages

SinerAthin wrote...

I'm glad to see no terrible nerfs but only buffs, mainly

Uhm... It was two guns, one getting a buff and a nerf. 

Again a pretty meager and underwhelming balance patch. I mean it's nice that the Eagle got a buff and the Harrier nerf, though weird is hardly devastating, but there's a lot of things that could use a buff and even a few that could use a small nerf.
Are they afraid they'll run out of things to patch if they do more than two items a week?

#95
Permafrost27

Permafrost27
  • Members
  • 191 messages

SinerAthin wrote...

Permafrost27 wrote...

No Damage Reduction on the Krysae bums me out.

Is the official stance really that it's balanced and functioning properly?


The only adjust the Krysae needs is to gain less + damage from Tactical Cloak.

Perhaps Reegar could do with the same. Remove some of its damage bonuses from cloak but leave the gun itself alone, and it'd been perfect.


Strongly disagree.

Rank X Krysae can be put on any class and instantly makes aiming and weapon use trivial.

The bare minimum weight on is it 100% cd reduction, meaning it's more around 130% for various races or passive power weight reduction evolutions.

If people want Infil nerfs too, that's on them, I'm entirely apathetic.

But the Krysae invalidates 9/10 of my weapon manifest just by existing.

#96
Xaijin

Xaijin
  • Members
  • 5 348 messages

Kalas321 wrote...

Air Quotes wrote...

Didn't dare to touch Reegar or Krysae since a lot of the people haven't unlocked them yet

The ones that have are already speed run records. Then anyone watching the videos will try to mimic and thats all anyone will use.:?


YEAH! Cause everyone that plays MEMP is a mouth breathing moron!

Sound logic there.

#97
Atheosis

Atheosis
  • Members
  • 3 519 messages

Cuddlezarro wrote...

since they nerfed the damn things weight for no reason they should buff the harriers spare ammo to compensate =/


There really is no logical reason why the Harrier shouldn't have, at minimum the Mattock's ammo capacity.  Especially seeing as it is heavier.  I still think the gun is very nice, but it does require you to camp ammo boxes far too much.

#98
Credit2team

Credit2team
  • Members
  • 5 582 messages
I'd like to take a moment to LMAO at the "nerf the kryrse" people. LOL you got owned.

#99
Shajar

Shajar
  • Members
  • 1 115 messages
Only useful AR gets nerf while pistols and snipers remain in "faceroll" status. Way to go :-)

#100
whalewhisker

whalewhisker
  • Members
  • 1 058 messages

billy the squid wrote...

Air Quotes wrote...

Didn't dare to touch Reegar or Krysae since a lot of the people haven't unlocked them yet


But they increased the encumbrance of the ultra rare Harrier because? ...lots of people have it? Counter intuative logic at work there.


bahahahaha