22 réponses à ce sujet

[GGW KillerTiger]

Am I the only 1 here that feels the current balance changes team just uts random weapons and powers with the words buff or nerf and then a random number on it into a hat then draws a few for every weeks balance changes? For example when were people on here complaining the Harrier is too light? Last I checked everyone thought it needed more ammo or was perfectly "balanced' then suddenly it gets more weight? Also when were people on here complaining sabatoge was over powered? I never saw a thread about it yet it randomly got nerfed to oblivion last week?

I for one have lost what little faith I had in BioWare after that. Anyone else?

[1337haxwtg]

It does seem many issues go unchecked and many nerfs happen where they aren't needed. Give it another week or two on the new weapons.

[vivanto]

The Harrier weight was intended to be like that from the start, it's rather a fix than a nerf.
ref.

[Iezza]

INCISOR YU NO GOOD.

[ABjerre]

I actually think they are pretty spot on with their balances. Ok, i do disagree with the amount of points added or substracted some times, but overall i agree with them.

Iezza wrote...

INCISOR YU NO GOOD.

Insicor plz

Modifié par ABjerre, 06 juin 2012 - 11:38 .

[Grimy Bunyip]

my only complaint is the pace of the balance updates.
2 weapons a week is the pace it seems.

[Kalas Magnus]

So true, but they should fix the bugs first. Makes classes unplayable like the vanguard.

[molecularman]

Now you're being rude.

And the harrier 'nerf'... Is that really so big deal to cry about, it was even intended from the start as somebody already said

[GGW KillerTiger]

Still seems hap hazard and random changes each time

[Kronner]

Another troll post by the same guy. Not surprised.

[AbhijitSM]

They could have buffed the spare ammo on the harrier with the fix it received.

[1337haxwtg]

I should add the Harrier thing is no big deal and attacking BioWare employees won't fix anything.

[Lee80]

I'm fairly sure they don't base their balance on what's said on this board. They may use it as a source, but probably not even the primary. Too much negativity to wade through for actual usable data.

[Killahead]

Here's an idea: rather than suggesting that Bioware fire a person who makes decisions you disagree with, you contribute in the debate on balance with constructive arguments. This is post is even more pointless than your "buff the kryase and reegar" posts that come with no reasoning other than you not performing as well as you'd like with them. The Harrier "nerf" will probably give you something like 0.2 seconds longer cooldowns.

Edit: Maybe I came off as a bit aggressive there, I just think this was rude of you and uncalled for.

Modifié par Killahead, 06 juin 2012 - 11:53 .

[1337haxwtg]

Killahead wrote...

Here's an idea: rather than suggesting that Bioware fire a person who makes decisions you disagree with, you contribute in the debate on balance with constructive arguments. This is post is even more pointless than your "buff the kryase and reegar" posts that come with no reasoning other than you not performing as well as you'd like with them. The Harrier "nerf" will probably give you something like 0.2 seconds longer cooldowns.

Edit: Maybe I came off as a bit aggressive there, I just think this was rude of you and uncalled for.

QFT

[Lord Chun]

GGW KillerTiger wrote...

Am I the only 1 here that feels the current balance changes team just uts random weapons and powers with the words buff or nerf and then a random number on it into a hat then draws a few for every weeks balance changes? For example when were people on here complaining the Harrier is too light? Last I checked everyone thought it needed more ammo or was perfectly "balanced' then suddenly it gets more weight? Also when were people on here complaining sabatoge was over powered? I never saw a thread about it yet it randomly got nerfed to oblivion last week?

I for one have lost what little faith I had in BioWare after that. Anyone else?

vacation much cuz thats what this is going to get you

[GGW KillerTiger]

Lord Chun wrote...

GGW KillerTiger wrote...

Am I the only 1 here that feels the current balance changes team just uts random weapons and powers with the words buff or nerf and then a random number on it into a hat then draws a few for every weeks balance changes? For example when were people on here complaining the Harrier is too light? Last I checked everyone thought it needed more ammo or was perfectly "balanced' then suddenly it gets more weight? Also when were people on here complaining sabatoge was over powered? I never saw a thread about it yet it randomly got nerfed to oblivion last week?

I for one have lost what little faith I had in BioWare after that. Anyone else?

vacation much cuz thats what this is going to get you

Would just prove that BioWare abuses their powers and takes advantage of the community. 

[GGW KillerTiger]

1337haxwtg wrote...

Killahead wrote...

Here's an idea: rather than suggesting that Bioware fire a person who makes decisions you disagree with, you contribute in the debate on balance with constructive arguments. This is post is even more pointless than your "buff the kryase and reegar" posts that come with no reasoning other than you not performing as well as you'd like with them. The Harrier "nerf" will probably give you something like 0.2 seconds longer cooldowns.

Edit: Maybe I came off as a bit aggressive there, I just think this was rude of you and uncalled for.

QFT

He doesn't even make changes the community wants. Last I checked nobody wanted the 1s I posted in my original post. Never 1ce saw them come up in discussion. Hello are you 2 brain dead?

[zeal.assassin]

I still think some other weapons should have been fixed but at least the eagle finally got buffed.

[Lord Chun]

GGW KillerTiger wrote...

Lord Chun wrote...

GGW KillerTiger wrote...

Am I the only 1 here that feels the current balance changes team just uts random weapons and powers with the words buff or nerf and then a random number on it into a hat then draws a few for every weeks balance changes? For example when were people on here complaining the Harrier is too light? Last I checked everyone thought it needed more ammo or was perfectly "balanced' then suddenly it gets more weight? Also when were people on here complaining sabatoge was over powered? I never saw a thread about it yet it randomly got nerfed to oblivion last week?

I for one have lost what little faith I had in BioWare after that. Anyone else?

vacation much cuz thats what this is going to get you

Would just prove that BioWare abuses their powers and takes advantage of the community. 

its their community there for they can run it however they want. even like a dictatorship if they soo please

[Killahead]

Like many have pointed out, they never intended for the Harrier to be that light.

As for sabotage my guess is that they nerfed tech vulnerability because of a) tactical scan, which provides a long lasting general debuff and potentially extra power damage on top, meaning this combined with sabotage's TV would make enemies die from tech powers really fast, and the fact that you no longer can headshot a Prime would make the abovementioned the new strategy for killing them and thus for farming Geth effectively.

[Poison_Berrie]

GGW KillerTiger wrote...
He doesn't even make changes the community wants. Last I checked nobody wanted the 1s I posted in my original post. Never 1ce saw them come up in discussion. Hello are you 2 brain dead?

You might be. It's been mentioned here and in the official thread that the Harrier was fix.
Also Sabotage had a massive 100% extra damage from tech-powers. That's a massive debuff.

And again BioWare shouldn't be basing all their balancing from these boards.

[Rifneno]

Who gives a vorcha's ass what it was intended to be? Let me spell it out for you. It was sent live, then it was changed detrimentally.

THAT IS A NERF.