Guest_Nizaris1_*
Modifié par Nizaris1, 08 juin 2012 - 01:07 .
Guest_Faerunner_*
Guest_Nizaris1_*
Faerunner wrote...
Didn't Alistair say that he's not sure if the Chantry is correct about Templars needing lyrium, it's just skepticism on his part. Since he never got a chance to take his vows or start taking his required draughts, I don't think he's lying so much as making an educated yet cynical guess based on the information he has. DA2 is in the middle of Templar Central, and dedicated Templars are more secretive about their methods, they would uphold the "lyrium is the only way" trade secret.
DA:O codex entries actually said that Qunari had horns, or many/most of them had horns, so it's not a plothole that they have them in DA2. Also, the devs said they were actually planning on giving DAO Qunari/Tal'Vashoth horns but decided against it because they couldn't/didn't want to adjust helmet graphics. (Not to mention those born hornless like Sten are believed to be blessed, and Val'Vasoth that denounce the Qun usually saw off their horns, and since Sten and Tal'Vasoth are the only ones you run into in DA:O...)
Flemeth is also a notorious shapeshifter, so she probably could look different if she chose.
Other than that? Yeah, the changes really are unnecessary. The elven changes especially. Those are hideous and unneeded, and blatantly contradictory in ways the kossith horns never could be!
THey've already addressed Gameplay and Lore discrepancies. One is the Designers job, the other the writers. If the designer decides that adhering to the writers lore will hold gameplay back, they won't do it in the GAMEPLAY part. Much like you being a bloodmage, yet not being hampered and hated for it. That's one discrepancy for the sake of gameplay. It's also one that they've stated that they're taking a look at and considering to amend.Nizaris1 wrote...
look at Templar mechanic, the warden can learn Templar ability without consume any lyrium, Alistair using Templar ability without lyrium either...so Templar no need for lyrium is true on that part, Alistair speaking the truth.....
wow BomimoDK you were mad when you wrote your opinion wow, anyway i dont see anyone here calling gaigerBomimoDK wrote...
THey've already addressed Gameplay and Lore discrepancies. One is the Designers job, the other the writers. If the designer decides that adhering to the writers lore will hold gameplay back, they won't do it in the GAMEPLAY part. Much like you being a bloodmage, yet not being hampered and hated for it. That's one discrepancy for the sake of gameplay. It's also one that they've stated that they're taking a look at and considering to amend.Nizaris1 wrote...
look at Templar mechanic, the warden can learn Templar ability without consume any lyrium, Alistair using Templar ability without lyrium either...so Templar no need for lyrium is true on that part, Alistair speaking the truth.....
I see a trend on this board, for people to blame the writers on almost everything. Even if it's out of their hands. I do NOT understand just WHY. From a Roleplay viewpoint, things should be blamed on the GM. That would be the whole team. People calling Gaider a lump of cancer because the healing spell has a cooldown seriously sicken me.
But then i realize that such people tend to have poor spelling and bad reading comprehension which means that either they're a minor in a native english country and therefore can't stop themselves OR they're people from a non-english speaking country with bad english skills and therefore not a snowballs chance in hell at Reading comprehension. It's STILL juvenile to just burst out and assume things (irony?). One thing ALL people who post like this, claiming and asserting without quotes, is that they're extremely egocentric and trigger-happy. They couldn't hold off their snarky remark if their own kids were at gunpoint.
It's quite sad, really...
I only see reviews with respect.. think about that you too.....
HITMZuk wrote...
Rumour mill states that DA3 is in development.
However, considering the the abyssmal sales and the fan-outrage following DA2, and to a degree ME3, I think EA needs to take a long and hard look at their options.
Wether or not they are willing to commit the time and resources that are needed to create a worthwhile DA3 remains to be seen. I do fear, however, that the Bioware brand is going the way of Westwood Studios, Bullfrog and Maxis: Milked for what it is worth and then dismantled.
Considering that most of DA:O was developed by Bioware before EA took over the company, the sharp drop in quality afterwards; mediocre DLC, a poor expansion and an abyssmal sequel, I fear that EA is not going to commit what is needed to revive the DA universe. Thus, effectively, it is dead, wether or not another "sequel", undeserving of the name, is produced.
Retour en haut