dreamgazer wrote...
KingZayd wrote...
exactly. For example, look at the "A song of Ice and Fire" series. There have been loads of interpretations made throughout, many of which have turned out to be wrong.
Even so, I have to take issue with the idea that there can be no misinterpretation in art. If I was to look at Van Gogh's sunflower painting and interpret "Boobs", I would probably be wrong, and if Van Gogh was around, he could be there to confirm that.
I came > this < close to starting a topic about the red comet in the second book and how it pertains to anchored, valid interpretation. But I got busy with work. (laughs)
That's part of why the second book is my favorite. That, and how they actually made the politics and world of Westeros work after ... well, after what happend at the end of the first book.
:innocent:
Yeah, after reading Game of Thrones, I expected the usual "sequel not as good as the original" problem. Thankfully I was wrong. It was so much better. I wish the TV show's second season had followed the books more.. Daenerys's story was butchered, nerfed Arya's dark/awesome changes and they merged Reek with Dagmer Cleftjaw. At least the King's landing parts were done brilliantly, particularly the battle of Blackwater Bay. The second book was better than the first, but the first season was better than the second.
GRRM's handling of the world's politics is masterful. And the second book is definitely one of my favourites, but I think book 3 is even better.
Hmm.. I'm wondering now if maybe the events are in some way influenced by the comet's presence, rather than the comet being a sign of something else? There do seem to be a lot of the weird magical things appearing at similar times, and the comet appears just before the dragons.
Alternatively the comet means "boobs"
Modifié par KingZayd, 09 juin 2012 - 01:13 .