But space has a vastly low level of resistive force. If it washigh enough tostop momentom likethe way you think it does....We would not have comets.KingZayd wrote...
dreman9999 wrote...
As I said...Mometum would work.KingZayd wrote...
mauro2222 wrote...
dreman9999 wrote...
A car is limitted by gravity so it will slow down. A space ship is not because space has little gravity and on resistance being a void.
Unless physics changed in the furture(And if it did, god help us) An object in motion stays in motion till it reached and equal of opposite force.
Momentum will work because of the lack of gravity(aka force) in space.
That's not what he meant.
I think you'll find cars are limited by friction rather than gravity. Yes the frictional force in the case of the car is proportional to the gravitational force pushing it down onto the rough surface, but it is not just gravity that does it.
In space the dust is diffuse, so you'd expect the resistive force to be small, and indeed it would be if travelling at lofrw speeds. But at high speeds, frictional forces would increase ( proportional to velocity^2), which means the power to overcome it would be proportional to velocity^3 (P=Fv)
As i said, no it wouldn't, because this resisitive force would be constantly taking your momentum away.
Why Would You Trust The Catalyst Or The Reaper Creator?
#126
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 06:17
#127
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 06:17
dreman9999 wrote...
Helium-3 is used as fuel...That found in gas giants. Why do you this a fuel station in ME2 and ME3 is always by a gas giant?
Also, reaper core don't need to discharge.
Oh, reapers are the standar ship in the galaxy?
And you need facilities to refuel, facilites that don't exist in every system. Or do you forget that just 1% of the galaxy has been explored, only the systems next to a mass relay.
#128
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 06:18
dreman9999 wrote...
Note that the turians did that too and if failed horribly.The Angry One wrote...
dreman9999 wrote...
Note that it failded horribly...
It failed horribly because it was a single fleet vs. several dozen capital ships. The tactic itself was sound.
They did not.
Note that the reapers can also flood the relay first with occoluses and take out any fleet there way before they arrive.
Occuli?
Woopee, fragile little fighters that can be countered by GARDIAN systems and opposing fighters.
Point is....It would not work because of the reapers horde tactics.
It wouldn't work because you can't predict where the Reapers are going to appear.
Modifié par The Night Mammoth, 08 juin 2012 - 06:21 .
#129
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 06:18
If you have the fuel station on the ship...It would not be a problem.mauro2222 wrote...
The Angry One wrote...
Gas giants can be used for fuel, IF you construct dedicated orbital stations for this purpose.
Using a fuel station to refuel is rather different than sucking fuel out of a planet
#130
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 06:19
The first cycle. How did Reapers come into being. If we take the Cat's mission statement as an indicator then the Reapers were a response to some Rise of The Machine day of reckoning.
Still doesn't explain how the Reapers came about, I mean, they are the harvested goo sacks of an extinct species and who's going to join the goo queue for that? Certanly not willingly. But hang on. Hasn't there been a plot device in 3 games that shows ppl doing things that they would not normally do? Indoctrination, I think you may have alot to answer for.
Maybe not. Maybe everyone in the first cycle thought being a Reaper would come with a huge benefits package, but I personally doubt it. Anyway, in the first cycle advanced races come up with Synth's, who go a bit nuts, and utterly outclass the orgs leading to Reapers being designed. Maybe as a hail mary saving throw, or the Orgs were on their way out and it was a last ditch effort revenge thing.
The Reaper mandate however is clear. Save the Orgs, destroy the Synth's, destroy anything that may result in more Synth's. Waaaaait a minute! Synth's come from Orgs and Reapers are supposed to save the Org's!?!? This is starting to sound like the 3 rules of robotics which were designed to protect humans from robots till the robots figured out that by taking control of us would save more of us by preventing wars and stuff!
I think the Reaper rules of saving Org's from Synth's may be like the logic used for the 3 rules. It was designed to do one thing. But creative reinterpretation to achieve a better result by breaking the letter of those rules and following the spirit of those rules via a different methodology is a viable alternative to the 'Cat is lying' argument.
Anyway, I'm just throwing this idea into the pool to see if it has the legs to sink or swim.
Modifié par Redbelle, 08 juin 2012 - 06:19 .
#131
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 06:19
dreman9999 wrote...
But space has a vastly low level of resistive force. If it washigh enough tostop momentom likethe way you think it does....We would not have comets.
You realize ships need to slow down, right?
You realize that going at any meaningful speed requires fuel, right?
#132
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 06:19
dreman9999 wrote...
But space has a vastly low level of resistive force. If it washigh enough tostop momentom likethe way you think it does....We would not have comets.
Gravity and collisions are what speeds them up and the expulsion of gases.
#133
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 06:19
#134
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 06:20
1. After the war there planty of reaper cores left in the galexy for the allied fleet to use.mauro2222 wrote...
dreman9999 wrote...
Helium-3 is used as fuel...That found in gas giants. Why do you this a fuel station in ME2 and ME3 is always by a gas giant?
Also, reaper core don't need to discharge.
Oh, reapers are the standar ship in the galaxy?
And you need facilities to refuel, facilites that don't exist in every system. Or do you forget that just 1% of the galaxy has been explored, only the systems next to a mass relay.
2. The ship can't have a refinatry built into it?
#135
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 06:20
dreman9999 wrote...
If you have the fuel station on the ship...It would not be a problem.mauro2222 wrote...
The Angry One wrote...
Gas giants can be used for fuel, IF you construct dedicated orbital stations for this purpose.
Using a fuel station to refuel is rather different than sucking fuel out of a planet
...................
Why can't you see the problem with that?
Transporting fuel requires more fuel.
#136
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 06:21
dreman9999 wrote...
If you have the fuel station on the ship...It would not be a problem.mauro2222 wrote...
The Angry One wrote...
Gas giants can be used for fuel, IF you construct dedicated orbital stations for this purpose.
Using a fuel station to refuel is rather different than sucking fuel out of a planet
And when do you plan to arrive? in this century or in the next millennium?
#137
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 06:21
#138
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 06:22
The Angry One wrote...
Gas giants can be used for fuel, IF you construct dedicated orbital stations for this purpose.
""skimmer ships" that can gather hydrogen and oxygen from anywhere in the universe" are mentioned in the codex.
#139
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 06:23
Yes. Also starting and stopping does not use up all the fuel. We can start at one point with a live ship with a refinery build into it...keep going on a directed path to a system with gas giant . Refuel and then hop to the next system.The Night Mammoth wrote...
dreman9999 wrote...
But space has a vastly low level of resistive force. If it washigh enough tostop momentom likethe way you think it does....We would not have comets.
You realize ships need to slow down, right?
You realize that going at any meaningful speed requires fuel, right?
#140
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 06:24
dreman9999 wrote...
Yes. Also starting and stopping does not use up all the fuel. We can start at one point with a live ship with a refinery build into it...keep going on a directed path to a system with gas giant . Refuel and then hop to the next system.The Night Mammoth wrote...
dreman9999 wrote...
But space has a vastly low level of resistive force. If it washigh enough tostop momentom likethe way you think it does....We would not have comets.
You realize ships need to slow down, right?
You realize that going at any meaningful speed requires fuel, right?
Now you've moved on to a completely different point.
End of line.
#141
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 06:25
#142
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 06:26
Wulfram wrote...
The Angry One wrote...
Gas giants can be used for fuel, IF you construct dedicated orbital stations for this purpose.
""skimmer ships" that can gather hydrogen and oxygen from anywhere in the universe" are mentioned in the codex.
Which aren't terribly efficient methods for larger ships, otherwise there wouldn't be a need for orbital fuel gatherers seen in virtually every inhabited system with a gas giant.
#143
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 06:26
No....It's near by gravity...I just looked it up. It's just pure physics.mauro2222 wrote...
dreman9999 wrote...
But space has a vastly low level of resistive force. If it washigh enough tostop momentom likethe way you think it does....We would not have comets.
Gravity and collisions are what speeds them up and the expulsion of gases.
#144
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 06:28
dreman9999 wrote...
But space has a vastly low level of resistive force. If it washigh enough tostop momentom likethe way you think it does....We would not have comets.KingZayd wrote...
dreman9999 wrote...
As I said...Mometum would work.KingZayd wrote...
mauro2222 wrote...
dreman9999 wrote...
A car is limitted by gravity so it will slow down. A space ship is not because space has little gravity and on resistance being a void.
Unless physics changed in the furture(And if it did, god help us) An object in motion stays in motion till it reached and equal of opposite force.
Momentum will work because of the lack of gravity(aka force) in space.
That's not what he meant.
I think you'll find cars are limited by friction rather than gravity. Yes the frictional force in the case of the car is proportional to the gravitational force pushing it down onto the rough surface, but it is not just gravity that does it.
In space the dust is diffuse, so you'd expect the resistive force to be small, and indeed it would be if travelling at lofrw speeds. But at high speeds, frictional forces would increase ( proportional to velocity^2), which means the power to overcome it would be proportional to velocity^3 (P=Fv)
As i said, no it wouldn't, because this resisitive force would be constantly taking your momentum away.
comets aren't travelling at FTL, nor do they have mass effect drives lowering their mass
FTL
#145
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 06:29
Redbelle wrote...
The first cycle. How did Reapers come into being. If we take the Cat's mission statement as an indicator then the Reapers were a response to some Rise of The Machine day of reckoning.
Still doesn't explain how the Reapers came about, I mean, they are the harvested goo sacks of an extinct species and who's going to join the goo queue for that? Certanly not willingly. But hang on. Hasn't there been a plot device in 3 games that shows ppl doing things that they would not normally do? Indoctrination, I think you may have alot to answer for.
Maybe not. Maybe everyone in the first cycle thought being a Reaper would come with a huge benefits package, but I personally doubt it. Anyway, in the first cycle advanced races come up with Synth's, who go a bit nuts, and utterly outclass the orgs leading to Reapers being designed. Maybe as a hail mary saving throw, or the Orgs were on their way out and it was a last ditch effort revenge thing.
Yeah my personal theory is that Catalyst is a religious cult leader. He came up with the nutty idealogical theory that created will destroy creators. Gained a following and then massacred the rest of the galaxy that didn't follow him to create first reapers. So basically a madman who has gained ability to commit galactic genocide.
#146
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 06:29
Wulfram wrote...
The Angry One wrote...
Gas giants can be used for fuel, IF you construct dedicated orbital stations for this purpose.
""skimmer ships" that can gather hydrogen and oxygen from anywhere in the universe" are mentioned in the codex.
It's used for fighter crafts... bigger ships don't have Helios engines.
#147
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 06:29
Yes, Occuli that has endless number and are in such a vast number that not all the fighters and gardian systems can take on at once can take can take out a fleet. Did youmissed the part about reapers using horde tactic as there main weopn in direct assult...It's the reason they are winning.The Night Mammoth wrote...
dreman9999 wrote...
Note that the turians did that too and if failed horribly.The Angry One wrote...
dreman9999 wrote...
Note that it failded horribly...
It failed horribly because it was a single fleet vs. several dozen capital ships. The tactic itself was sound.
They did not.Note that the reapers can also flood the relay first with occoluses and take out any fleet there way before they arrive.
Occuli?
Woopee, fragile little fighters that can be countered by GARDIAN systems and opposing fighters.Point is....It would not work because of the reapers horde tactics.
It wouldn't work because you can't predict where the Reapers are going to appear.
#148
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 06:31
dreman9999 wrote...
No....It's near by gravity...I just looked it up. It's just pure physics.mauro2222 wrote...
dreman9999 wrote...
But space has a vastly low level of resistive force. If it washigh enough tostop momentom likethe way you think it does....We would not have comets.
Gravity and collisions are what speeds them up and the expulsion of gases.
... what's your point? it's exactly what I said, or do you actually thought that their own gravity speeds them up?
#149
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 06:32
dreman9999 wrote...
Yes, Occuli that has endless number and are in such a vast number that not all the fighters and gardian systems can take on at once can take can take out a fleet.
Complete conjecture.
Did youmissed the part about reapers using horde tactic as there main weopn in direct assult...It's the reason they are winning.
Evidently, I did.
Most likely because this plot point does not exist.
They us overwhelming force, not 'horde tactics'. There are many reasons to contribute to the Reapers winning, this is one, but there are many others.
But obviously, they aren't that successful. Just consult Galactic Readiness for more information.
#150
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 06:32
1. The fuel station is a refinary,The Night Mammoth wrote...
dreman9999 wrote...
If you have the fuel station on the ship...It would not be a problem.mauro2222 wrote...
The Angry One wrote...
Gas giants can be used for fuel, IF you construct dedicated orbital stations for this purpose.
Using a fuel station to refuel is rather different than sucking fuel out of a planet
...................
Why can't you see the problem with that?
Transporting fuel requires more fuel.
2. Contiued use of fuel to keep momentum is only a case with vichiles in heavier graivties....Space have little gravity so it won't be a problem out side of starting and stopping.





Retour en haut






