Let them talk [Old Man and a Kid scene support thread]
#276
Posté 21 juin 2012 - 09:44
#277
Posté 21 juin 2012 - 09:45
estebanus wrote...
Dear god, you really are a necromancer, aren't you?
I had hoped to never see this thread again.
#278
Posté 21 juin 2012 - 09:47
At this point he's really just attention whoring.estebanus wrote...
Dear god, you really are a necromancer, aren't you?
I mean, he has always been whoring for attention. That's why his "Normandy Crash scene support thread" includes some ridiculous theory. Why should he do that other than to get attention?
Modifié par Sauruz, 21 juin 2012 - 09:49 .
#279
Posté 21 juin 2012 - 09:49
Sauruz wrote...
At this point he's really just attention whoring.estebanus wrote...
Dear god, you really are a necromancer, aren't you?
I still do not feel I got a satisfying answer for my question on the last page.
#280
Posté 21 juin 2012 - 09:51
Lizardviking wrote...
Sauruz wrote...
At this point he's really just attention whoring.estebanus wrote...
Dear god, you really are a necromancer, aren't you?
I still do not feel I got a satisfying answer for my question on the last page.
You never will, trust me. You never will.
#281
Posté 21 juin 2012 - 09:52
You won't.Lizardviking wrote...
Sauruz wrote...
At this point he's really just attention whoring.estebanus wrote...
Dear god, you really are a necromancer, aren't you?
I still do not feel I got a satisfying answer for my question on the last page.
I was at this point with Seival before so many times... with any luck, he'll just pat your head and silently acknowledge your arguments after you've repeaten them a dozen times.
#282
Posté 21 juin 2012 - 09:57
estebanus wrote...
Lizardviking wrote...
Sauruz wrote...
At this point he's really just attention whoring.estebanus wrote...
Dear god, you really are a necromancer, aren't you?
I still do not feel I got a satisfying answer for my question on the last page.
You never will, trust me. You never will.
Just one of many problems with the ending.
Blowing up a relay causes a supernova that destroys an entire system.... except when it doesn't.
The low-EMS-destroy wave kills all life in the galaxy..... except when it doesn't.
#283
Posté 21 juin 2012 - 10:29
Lizardviking wrote...
estebanus wrote...
Lizardviking wrote...
Sauruz wrote...
At this point he's really just attention whoring.estebanus wrote...
Dear god, you really are a necromancer, aren't you?
I still do not feel I got a satisfying answer for my question on the last page.
You never will, trust me. You never will.
Just one of many problems with the ending.
Blowing up a relay causes a supernova that destroys an entire system.... except when it doesn't.
The low-EMS-destroy wave kills all life in the galaxy..... except when it doesn't.
That is just a common misunderstanding of the endings.
#284
Posté 22 juin 2012 - 12:41
#285
Posté 22 juin 2012 - 01:33
#286
Posté 22 juin 2012 - 01:36
the acting...omfg such horrible performance
#287
Posté 22 juin 2012 - 01:39
Sauruz wrote...
At this point he's really just attention whoring.estebanus wrote...
Dear god, you really are a necromancer, aren't you?
I mean, he has always been whoring for attention. That's why his "Normandy Crash scene support thread" includes some ridiculous theory. Why should he do that other than to get attention?
he is a nap with stupid childish theory
**** indeed...
#288
Posté 22 juin 2012 - 01:41
Phlander wrote...
i bet seilva or wtf the name...support that @ss too ?
why u dont make a support thread about dat @ss seilva
#289
Posté 22 juin 2012 - 05:45
#290
Posté 22 juin 2012 - 12:09
Modifié par Uncle Jo, 22 juin 2012 - 12:25 .
#291
Posté 22 juin 2012 - 12:19
Seival wrote...
Lizardviking wrote...
Just one of many problems with the ending.
Blowing up a relay causes a supernova that destroys an entire system.... except when it doesn't.
The low-EMS-destroy wave kills all life in the galaxy..... except when it doesn't.
That is just a common misunderstanding of the endings.
By 'common misunderstanding' I'm pretty sure you mean obvious logical deductions from the events of the game.
It's not the fault of the audience if BioWare can't even keep simple things like this from being coherent.
#292
Posté 22 juin 2012 - 12:27
Seival wrote...
Lizardviking wrote...
Just one of many problems with the ending.
Blowing up a relay causes a supernova that destroys an entire system.... except when it doesn't.
The low-EMS-destroy wave kills all life in the galaxy..... except when it doesn't.
That is just a common misunderstanding of the endings.
Mass relay destruction (you know explosions and them blowing apart) previous to the ending were totally bad things and destroyed the star system they were in. In the codex entry "Desperate Measures" the rupture of a relay and not necessarily total destruction of one was said would cause terrestrial worlds in that star system to be ruined. This would have totally screwed all people.
You have repeatedly shown a misunderstanding of the games as well as the ending. The devs saw that a lot of people were complaining about the inconsistency of what the Arrival said and so they then put forth in a web piece that the explosion was more limited so it didn't destroy the galaxy. That's major retconning.
Low EMS Destroy choice vaporizes Earth-don't know what happens elsewhere, but why was Earth vaporized?
That does not bode well for humans at all.
In the Final Hours the flowchart for the story says the Crucible creates a galactic dark ages. That sounds pretty bad to me-no crash tests with living and breathing crash test dummies. No mass relays. Starvation, pestilence, and so on.
The star gazer scene is a bit ambiguous, but leads to the idea that interstellar flight has not yet been re-achieved.
#293
Posté 22 juin 2012 - 12:30
#294
Posté 22 juin 2012 - 10:02
#295
Posté 22 juin 2012 - 10:14





Retour en haut







