27765 réponses à ce sujet

[Cainhurst Crow]

https://twitter.com/BioEvilChris

[Lieber]

Weird. Thanks for the link!

[juhi95]

I can't wait for news,i'm like a child on Christmas Eve.

Modifié par juhi95, 08 février 2013 - 09:36 .

[Clayless]

Snypy wrote...

Each of the quotes links to a page where you can read the whole interview; therefore, you can get the context if you wish.

By the way, this is the second paragraph of the quote you mentioned:
"It’s more like there are some really obvious things that are different and then lots and lots of smaller things, lots of things about who lives and who dies, civilizations that rose and fell, all the way down to individual characters. That becomes the state of where you left your galaxy..."

It merely adds redundant information, but it doesn't refute the first paragraph, in which Casey said that the game wouldn't feature a typical A, B, or C choice of endings, which it did.

The first one I clicked, the one about Reapers winning, was wrong. I had to go and track down the quote that showed Bioware said it wasn't possible and demand the OP stop deliberately misleading people. He did put it in the OP eventually, but the point still stands, his link was misleading and the OP was throwing out information without caring how accurate it was. It's deceitful.

And you even misquoted the second paragraph, which is also deceitful, so here's the full quote for those of us that don't think misleading half-information is a way to discover if someone is lying:

Yeah, and I’d say much more so, because we have the ability to build the endings out in a way that we don’t have to worry about eventually tying them back together somewhere. This story arc is coming to an end with this game. That means the endings can be a lot more different. At this point we’re taking into account so many decisions that you’ve made as a player and reflecting a lot of that stuff. It’s not even in any way like the traditional game endings, where you can say how many endings there are or whether you got ending A, B, or C.

It’s more like there are some really obvious things that are different and then lots and lots of smaller things, lots of things about who lives and who dies, civilizations that rose and fell, all the way down to individual characters. That becomes the state of where you left your galaxy. The endings have a lot more sophistication and variety in them. It would be interesting to see if somebody could put together a chart for that. Even with Mass Effect 2’s...

So he's talking about how different games can be at the end. That there's some really obvious things, like civilisations that rose and fell or who lives and who dies, all the way down to individual characters. Like how you believe a Destroy ending with no Geth or Quarians, Jack turned into a Phantom, Wreav leading the newly cured Krogans and Eve dead, a romanced Miranda who died in your arms and Javik contemplating living with the Hanar to be exactly the same as another Destroy ending where none of that stuff happened. He doesn't. He considers those endings, the state of where you left your galaxy, to be different.

Trying to pretend those endings are the same doesn't mean they are, and it doesn't mean he's lying.

Modifié par Robosexual, 08 février 2013 - 10:09 .

[Neverwinter_Knight77]

BalooTheBear wrote...

StElmo wrote...

ElitePinecone wrote...

Chris Priestly @BioEvilChris
I think Shepard would throw a kickass party. #nocontext

He didn't seriously say that....

He does know thats like putting a mass effect drive core onto the hype train.

Oh this is going to end well!

All aboard.

Rofl... I'm interested to see where this train goes.

[Andrew Waples]

https://twitter.com/...050458997829632
Still being tested. Likely the week after next, but still TBD.

Someone asked when can we except a annoucment, so i think it's almost a guartnee that the dlc will come out in march

[NatP]

eaglefan129 wrote...

https://twitter.com/...050458997829632
Still being tested. Likely the week after next, but still TBD.

Someone asked when can we except a annoucment, so i think it's almost a guartnee that the dlc will come out in march

Well, he also did say to expect teasers in February and we got them earlier...

[Andrew Waples]

NatP wrote...

eaglefan129 wrote...

https://twitter.com/...050458997829632
Still being tested. Likely the week after next, but still TBD.

Someone asked when can we except a annoucment, so i think it's almost a guartnee that the dlc will come out in march

Well, he also did say to expect teasers in February and we got them earlier...

i think he meant a proper annoucment you know title. price point..etc (assuming he's rerferring to sp)

Modifié par eaglefan129, 09 février 2013 - 02:21 .

[ElitePinecone]

eaglefan129 wrote...

https://twitter.com/...050458997829632
Still being tested. Likely the week after next, but still TBD.

Someone asked when can we except a annoucment, so i think it's almost a guartnee that the dlc will come out in march

Yeah, was just about to post that.

The week after next starts from Feb 18th, so I guess (as Chris said) we can possibly expect more information around that time. 

[Jadebaby]

Neverwinter_Knight77 wrote...

BalooTheBear wrote...

StElmo wrote...

ElitePinecone wrote...

Chris Priestly @BioEvilChris
I think Shepard would throw a kickass party. #nocontext

He didn't seriously say that....

He does know thats like putting a mass effect drive core onto the hype train.

Oh this is going to end well!

All aboard.

Rofl... I'm interested to see where this train goes.

CHOO CHOO!!

[StElmo]

Jadebaby wrote...

Neverwinter_Knight77 wrote...

BalooTheBear wrote...

StElmo wrote...

ElitePinecone wrote...

Chris Priestly @BioEvilChris
I think Shepard would throw a kickass party. #nocontext

He didn't seriously say that....

He does know thats like putting a mass effect drive core onto the hype train.

Oh this is going to end well!

All aboard.

Rofl... I'm interested to see where this train goes.

CHOO CHOO!!

*sigh*

[Snypy]

Robosexual wrote...

Snypy wrote...

Each of the quotes links to a page where you can read the whole interview; therefore, you can get the context if you wish.

By the way, this is the second paragraph of the quote you mentioned:
"It’s more like there are some really obvious things that are different and then lots and lots of smaller things, lots of things about who lives and who dies, civilizations that rose and fell, all the way down to individual characters. That becomes the state of where you left your galaxy..."

It merely adds redundant information, but it doesn't refute the first paragraph, in which Casey said that the game wouldn't feature a typical A, B, or C choice of endings, which it did.

The first one I clicked, the one about Reapers winning, was wrong. I had to go and track down the quote that showed Bioware said it wasn't possible and demand the OP stop deliberately misleading people. He did put it in the OP eventually, but the point still stands, his link was misleading and the OP was throwing out information without caring how accurate it was. It's deceitful.

Actually, the quote was copied from an interview. It wasn't the OP who was misleading people.

And you even misquoted the second paragraph, which is also deceitful, so here's the full quote for those of us that don't think misleading half-information is a way to discover if someone is lying:

Yeah, and I’d say much more so, because we have the ability to build the endings out in a way that we don’t have to worry about eventually tying them back together somewhere. This story arc is coming to an end with this game. That means the endings can be a lot more different. At this point we’re taking into account so many decisions that you’ve made as a player and reflecting a lot of that stuff. It’s not even in any way like the traditional game endings, where you can say how many endings there are or whether you got ending A, B, or C.

It’s more like there are some really obvious things that are different and then lots and lots of smaller things, lots of things about who lives and who dies, civilizations that rose and fell, all the way down to individual characters. That becomes the state of where you left your galaxy. The endings have a lot more sophistication and variety in them. It would be interesting to see if somebody could put together a chart for that. Even with Mass Effect 2’s...

So he's talking about how different games can be at the end. That there's some really obvious things, like civilisations that rose and fell or who lives and who dies, all the way down to individual characters. Like how you believe a Destroy ending with no Geth or Quarians, Jack turned into a Phantom, Wreav leading the newly cured Krogans and Eve dead, a romanced Miranda who died in your arms and Javik contemplating living with the Hanar to be exactly the same as another Destroy ending where none of that stuff happened. He doesn't. He considers those endings, the state of where you left your galaxy, to be different.

Trying to pretend those endings are the same doesn't mean they are, and it doesn't mean he's lying.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the original ending doesn't show you how various civilizations end up -- Mass Relays are always destroyed, and the Normandy always ends up on that "paradise" planet. You don't know what happens to the Krogan, the Geth, Quarians, Turians, the Asari, Humans, or Salarians. Sometimes, you don't even know how many members of your crew survive. Therefore, the (original) ending is definitely a choice between A, B, or C. The Extended Cut DLC provided a bit more context, but you still have to choose A, B, C, or D at the end.

Therefore, what Casey Hudson said in that interview was a lie.

[CoolioThane]

Twitter thread peeps. Don't want this getting locked down.

Michael Gamble ‏@GambleMike
@Heenanomega When we tease, people get angry!

Indicating no more teasage...so we wait for the week after next for an official announcement?

[davishepard]

*Post not related to thread edited*

It would be nice to hear at least what is this DLC soon (next week).
Omega only got a trailer the day before it's release, but everyone already knew what the DLC was about.

Also, for you guys that watch the twitter, the previous DLC were so talked about in there like this one too?

Modifié par davishepard, 09 février 2013 - 10:33 .

[Grubas]

davishepard wrote...

*Post not related to thread edited*

It would be nice to hear at least what is this DLC soon (next week).
Omega only got a trailer the day before it's release, but everyone already knew what the DLC was about.

Also, for you guys that watch the twitter, the previous DLC were so talked about in there like this one too?

This is the most interesting part about this DLC. 
I just can't imagine what it will be about.
Its citadel themed.
It got a new area (R&R).

What do we make of this? 

[BalooTheBear]

CoolioThane wrote...

Twitter thread peeps. Don't want this getting locked down.

Michael Gamble ‏@GambleMike
@Heenanomega When we tease, people get angry!

Indicating no more teasage...so we wait for the week after next for an official announcement?

I think thats one of the main reasons that the developers don't come here as much. Whatever they say it gets jusmped on and then makes people mad. They really can't win at the moment,

[Neverwinter_Knight77]

They never officially announce anything until a few days before it comes out. That's the part that makes me so impatient. No real, solid info...

[rapscallioness]

Ah, Shepard would throw a kick ass party.

Tables would be flipped; the cops would end up raiding it, and more than half the ppl would end up in jail. Over the weekend, no less. Court dates covering assault on a C-Sec officer w/ a deadly weapon..and general hooliganism will be pending based on survival of the Reaper War.

Oh, Shep.....

[B.Shep]

BalooTheBear wrote...

CoolioThane wrote...

Twitter thread peeps. Don't want this getting locked down.

Michael Gamble ‏@GambleMike
@Heenanomega When we tease, people get angry!

Indicating no more teasage...so we wait for the week after next for an official announcement?

I think thats one of the main reasons that the developers don't come here as much. Whatever they say it gets jusmped on and then makes people mad. They really can't win at the moment,

Well, let's face it, there are a lot of jerks here on the bsn...

[Clayless]

Snypy wrote...

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the original ending doesn't show you how various civilizations end up -- Mass Relays are always destroyed, and the Normandy always ends up on that "paradise" planet. You don't know what happens to the Krogan, the Geth, Quarians, Turians, the Asari, Humans, or Salarians. Sometimes, you don't even know how many members of your crew survive. Therefore, the (original) ending is definitely a choice between A, B, or C. The Extended Cut DLC provided a bit more context, but you still have to choose A, B, C, or D at the end.

Therefore, what Casey Hudson said in that interview was a lie.

Wait, you're telling me that if you destroy the Quarians, and see them be destroyed, it means you don't see how they end up unless you see it twice?

Therefore it's a lie to say you see how they end up unless you're shown it again a few hours later?

What?

No matter how hard you try to pretend that's a lie, it's not.

Modifié par Robosexual, 10 février 2013 - 06:35 .

[Grubas]

Robosexual, please leave.

Modifié par Grubas, 10 février 2013 - 06:53 .

[dreamgazer]

http://pressthebutto...3f8e9970c-800wi

[Jadebaby]

Why?