27765 réponses à ce sujet

[Leonia]

dreamgazer wrote...

http://pressthebutto...3f8e9970c-800wi

I died, thanks for that.

[CynicalShep]

leonia42 wrote...

dreamgazer wrote...

http://pressthebutto...3f8e9970c-800wi

I died, thanks for that.

Craig Ferguson is the funniest SOB in space

[bboynexus]

Best comedian in late night.

[ElitePinecone]

Take Craig Ferguson to the off-topic forum, ffs.

[Snypy]

Robosexual wrote...

Snypy wrote...
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the original ending doesn't show you how various civilizations end up -- Mass Relays are always destroyed, and the Normandy always ends up on that "paradise" planet. You don't know what happens to the Krogan, the Geth, Quarians, Turians, the Asari, Humans, or Salarians. Sometimes, you don't even know how many members of your crew survive. Therefore, the (original) ending is definitely a choice between A, B, or C. The Extended Cut DLC provided a bit more context, but you still have to choose A, B, C, or D at the end.

Therefore, what Casey Hudson said in that interview was a lie.

Wait, you're telling me that if you destroy the Quarians, and see them be destroyed, it means you don't see how they end up unless you see it twice?

Therefore it's a lie to say you see how they end up unless you're shown it again a few hours later?

What?

No matter how hard you try to pretend that's a lie, it's not.

The point you're trying to make depends entirely on the fact that you destroy the Quarians on Ranoch. But what happens if you don't destroy them? Can you see (in the 'original' ending) whether they survived the war or not? No, you can't see it. The same goes for all other races, too. Therefore, we were lied to. And if you want to continue with this discussion, please, come up with some actual arguments.

Modifié par Snypy, 10 février 2013 - 10:21 .

[Clayless]

Snypy wrote...

Robosexual wrote...
]Wait, you're telling me that if you destroy the Quarians, and see them be destroyed, it means you don't see how they end up unless you see it twice?

Therefore it's a lie to say you see how they end up unless you're shown it again a few hours later?

What?

No matter how hard you try to pretend that's a lie, it's not.

The point you're trying to make depends entirely on the fact that you destroy the Quarians on Ranoch. But what happens if you don't destroy them? Can you see (in the 'original' ending) whether they survived the war or not? No, you can't see it. The same goes for all other races, too. Therefore, we were lied to. And if you want to continue with this discussion, please, come up with some actual arguments.

Wait so if you destroy the Quarians it's the same as if you don't destroy the Quarians, unless you see it twice? Or are you saying that if you do everything identical to someone else your ending will be identical, therefore he's lying? What?

Seriously, you're not making any sense.

Modifié par Robosexual, 10 février 2013 - 10:37 .

[n0odles]

Robosexual wrote...

Snypy wrote...

Robosexual wrote...
]Wait, you're telling me that if you destroy the Quarians, and see them be destroyed, it means you don't see how they end up unless you see it twice?

Therefore it's a lie to say you see how they end up unless you're shown it again a few hours later?

What?

No matter how hard you try to pretend that's a lie, it's not.

The point you're trying to make depends entirely on the fact that you destroy the Quarians on Ranoch. But what happens if you don't destroy them? Can you see (in the 'original' ending) whether they survived the war or not? No, you can't see it. The same goes for all other races, too. Therefore, we were lied to. And if you want to continue with this discussion, please, come up with some actual arguments.

Wait so if you destroy the Quarians it's the same as if you don't destroy the Quarians, unless you see it twice? Or are you saying that if you do everything identical to someone else your ending will be identical, therefore he's lying? What?

Seriously, you're not making any sense.

Would the both of you take this somewhere else, please? (Rob, you're a bit of a nob) I just come here to check to see if there's anything new on Twitter considering I don't have the damn thing and I don't want to have to sift through your retarded argument to do so.

[MaximizedAction]

CynicalShep wrote...

leonia42 wrote...

dreamgazer wrote...

http://pressthebutto...3f8e9970c-800wi

I died, thanks for that.

Craig Ferguson is the funniest SOB in space

Check Ze Tweeeeets.

And there I was, thinking fellow ME fans couldn't get any more awesome!

[Snypy]

Robosexual wrote...
Stuff

Ignorance is a bliss, huh? I won't waste my breath anymore.

[Don_Esteban]

If you dont know yet, you can discuss via p.m., i guess not everyone in this thread is interested in that discussion.

[dreamgazer]

Jadebaby wrote...

Why?

I dunno. Checking ze tweets is the actual purpose of this thread though, no?

[Clayless]

Snypy wrote...

Ignorance is a bliss, huh? I won't waste my breath anymore.

I wouldn't really describe what you're doing as ignorance. Straight up lies would be a bit more of an accurate description.

But they're right we better not derail this thread any further. PM me if you want to continue.

[Jadebaby]

dreamgazer wrote...

Jadebaby wrote...

Why?

I dunno. Checking ze tweets is the actual purpose of this thread though, no?

Yes, it's funny how many people forget that..

So uhh.. I'm sure one of them has probably tweeted what they're having for lunch, or something... Should we speculate on that until more important stuff comes to light?

FTR, I'm going with vegemite and cheese.

[fiendishchicken]

Jadebaby wrote...

dreamgazer wrote...

Jadebaby wrote...

Why?

I dunno. Checking ze tweets is the actual purpose of this thread though, no?

Yes, it's funny how many people forget that..

So uhh.. I'm sure one of them has probably tweeted what they're having for lunch, or something... Should we speculate on that until more important stuff comes to light?

FTR, I'm going with vegemite and cheese.

Peanut Butter and Jelly ftw.

Btw, Chris Priestly, on twitter (and I saw this on an FB page) said that it may be possible to have an announcement the week after next.

[ElitePinecone]

Yes, that was also posted about three pages back before two people decided to act like they were four years old.

The week after next starts on Feb 18, which is roughly around the mid-Feb date that Chris first estimated a while ago. He safd the DLC is currently going through testing (unsure if he meant internal QA or external certification), so we'll see what happens in a week or more.

I was thinking April was still an outside possibility for release but it looks more like March now IMO; a dev did tweet or post recently (it might've been Chris or Mike Gamble, I'm not sure) that they tend to reveal the DLC relatively close to its release date. As people have been saying here, it's even possible they've timed it for the anniversary of ME3's launch - we'll have to wait and see.

[dead_goon]

Looks like there might not be any news release till the last week in Feb, which is a little discouraging with regards a DLC release in time for ME3's anniversary.

Still being tested. Likely the week after next, but still TBD.

https://twitter.com/...050458997829632

Modifié par dead_goon, 10 février 2013 - 06:08 .

[Leonia]

I wonder if that is SP DLC only or both? Usually we get MP stuff before SP but if the two are related somehow we might have to wait longer this time.

[NatP]

leonia42 wrote...

I wonder if that is SP DLC only or both? Usually we get MP stuff before SP but if the two are related somehow we might have to wait longer this time.

Hmm... Maybe it's an expansion-like DLC that has both SP and MP content... I doubt it though.

[thepiebaker]

dead_goon wrote...

Looks like there might not be any news release till the last week in Feb, which is a little discouraging with regards a DLC release in time for ME3's anniversary.

Still being tested. Likely the week after next, but still TBD.

https://twitter.com/...050458997829632

they continue to test it after sending it in to get cetified and release a patch close to the release

[Ghost]

thepiebaker wrote...

dead_goon wrote...

Looks like there might not be any news release till the last week in Feb, which is a little discouraging with regards a DLC release in time for ME3's anniversary.

Still being tested. Likely the week after next, but still TBD.

https://twitter.com/...050458997829632

they continue to test it after sending it in to get cetified and release a patch close to the release

This is the SP DLC. The one you are talking about is the MP DLC.

[v_c_gie]

https://twitter.com/...798719274663936

A friend pointed me at a bunch of NSFW Mass Effect art I hadn't seen before. Now terrified about what art the next DLC will inspire.

[Bendigoe]

Oh cool. So it's legit that Aria Is Aleena now apparently.
Read the posts below his tweet.

[Andrew Waples]

v_c_gie wrote...

https://twitter.com/...798719274663936

A friend pointed me at a bunch of NSFW Mass Effect art I hadn't seen before. Now terrified about what art the next DLC will inspire.

i don't think this is "mass effect" related in terms of actual dlc..just in general 

[ElitePinecone]

Bendigoe wrote...

Oh cool. So it's legit that Aria Is Aleena now apparently.
Read the posts below his tweet.

Omega would've been so much more interesting if we'd got an insight into Aria's background as Aleena or rivalry with Wrex, rather than a pretty generic war story.

Buh. Don't suppose that plotline will ever be addressed again anyway, so it's a bit moot.