IsaacShep wrote...
Exactly.
Can only mean good things for character interactions
Plus, there will be mini-games in casino, could take more space than we think. Also, furnishing Shep's apartement
I wonder if Dusty designed the apartment. As the Normandy's designer, he probably has the most experience with variable set pieces (since the ship and cabin change quite a bit throughout the game).
Will be interesting to see.
Nerevar-as wrote...
No, the message is they can screw up whatever & however they like, leave it screwed up, and you´ll still get what they put out, no matter how bad they do are and the little concern they show about you. There´s making mistakes and there´s doing something so bad it seems they were trying.
I wanted them to fix the ending, but even before that, I told Mike that squad content is a must. I wasn't able to get Omega for that reason, and I'll be buying Citadel for that reason. That was really the only requirement I ever set for them to get my business for ME3 DLC.
That doesn't mean I have any intention of investing in any future installments (I have no real interest in any further ME games, and I've said repeatedly that I will be unwilling to purchase any game that shares the same lead writer). But I still care about the characters in this trilogy, enough that I'm willing to set aside my distaste for the ending and the way the situation was handled (and I think the team deserves the support for working so hard and choosing to focus on the characters that really define the trilogy).
So no, there are consequences. I don't really care about the franchise anymore. It's just something that's not reflected in my DLC purchasing decisions for this trilogy (well, it actually is, since I would have purchased Omega even without squad content if the ending had not been so atrocious).
Modifié par devSin, 21 février 2013 - 07:54 .