Time travel.
That's more like it.
Intergalactic travel somehow seems more redundant to me than time travel.
...400 billion suns.
Time travel.
That's more like it.
Intergalactic travel somehow seems more redundant to me than time travel.
...400 billion suns.
but that's not "far". We've visited all ends, just not everywhere in between. To me, that'd be "deep", not "far".Easy: >99% of the Milky Way wasn't explored by Citadel Races.
Time travel.
There's going to be a relay with a flux capacitor built into it?
Time travel.
I have a theory:
A few tweets back there was a hint about the return of a vehicle. We'll see the Mako 2.0 with a new, experimental engine, and this time it won't only ignore physics... but it will also bend the rules of time itself!
The idea was to return 10 years into the past, but as any Mako, the vehicle will fail miserably and send you to 2148. Now you have the task to re-discover the Mass Effect technology and fix everything before it's too late.
I hope we actually get to visit some of the homeworlds in this one and explore. We never got to see Palaven! If there was a hub on each council homeworld, that would be awesome. You could even go out for a drive around the streets (sky-streets?)!
I hope we actually get to visit some of the homeworlds in this one and explore. We never got to see Palaven! If there was a hub on each council homeworld, that would be awesome. You could even go out for a drive around the streets (sky-streets?)!
Holly sh*t, I just imagined a GTA-like Mass Effect: driving the mako around the streets...lol
![]()
Holly sh*t, I just imagined a GTA-like Mass Effect: driving the mako around the streets...lol
![]()
Oh. My. Space. Gods.
YES.
Cruising round the streets of Palaven shooting up the shops and driving up walls with the Mako.
I love it when a plot comes together. ![]()
Yeah!
Checking Garrus' calibrations at last weekend's @DenverComicCon! @masseffect @bioware

"How far we'll go" Does not have to refer to distance. It can also refer to game mechanics and actions the player can take. A literal interpretation should not be assumed.
Very much this, you only have to look back at how far BW went in ME3 ( killing Mordin, killing Wrex, Tali's suicide etc ).
Jay Watamaniuk @JayWatamaniuk
Once again, fantastic: “@TheMarySue: "I Should Go" Is The Mass Effect/Frozen Parody We Didn't Know We Wanted http://www.themarysue.com/mass-effect-frozen-parody/ …”

Yes, please! // What If Mass Effect Involved Reaper Fights With Pacific Rim-Style Jaegers? http://goo.gl/vRJHi0 via @TheMarySue
Thanks for the time travel love, guys.
Embrace eternity. Cross the singularity horizon. Have no beginning, and no end.
I should go. *leaves*
"How far we'll go" Does not have to refer to distance. It can also refer to game mechanics and actions the player can take. A literal interpretation should not be assumed.
While it should not be assumed, it does pretty likely to be what he was talking about considering how much they were going on about "new area of space"
While it should not be assumed, it does pretty likely to be what he was talking about considering how much they were going on about "new area of space"
Is saying it once going on about it?
Is saying it once going on about it?
They seemed pretty centered on the newness, yes.
how about we just start back at haestrom...you know...where the original mass effect ending script started with dark energy? that way we could get the game we paid for 2 years ago...
Please stop with the endless talking in this thread about wether it takes place in another galaxy or not. The bottomline simply is that there is not enough information to debunk the theory or proof it, so there is no way that one group will eventually win this discussion at the moment. I find the discussion very interesting though, but we already have the full-fledged Ark Theory thread discussing the possibility that it takes place in another galaxy and that makes going on about the theory in this thread pretty useless.
About Haestrom, I think the Shepard trilogy itself has had enough attention for quite some time. This might be interesting in the long run, but for me it is very important now that they go on with the universe and do something new instead of a reboot.
Maybe they should go back to the dark energy plot. They never ran with it in ME3 like they were supposed to, so maybe they can use it for the new games and just not involve the Reapers.
Maybe, though personally I'd rather have a threat with a face than an impersonal encroaching disaster.Maybe they should go back to the dark energy plot. They never ran with it in ME3 like they were supposed to, so maybe they can use it for the new games and just not involve the Reapers.
Oh plot I'm working on, we have been enemies so long I call you old friend. #Space!
It’s your Sinestro!
Please stop with the endless talking in this thread about wether it takes place in another galaxy or not. The bottomline simply is that there is not enough information to debunk the theory or proof it, so there is no way that one group will eventually win this discussion at the moment. I find the discussion very interesting though, but we already have the full-fledged Ark Theory thread discussing the possibility that it takes place in another galaxy and that makes going on about the theory in this thread pretty useless.
About Haestrom, I think the Shepard trilogy itself has had enough attention for quite some time. This might be interesting in the long run, but for me it is very important now that they go on with the universe and do something new instead of a reboot.
It's not there is proof for it or not, its that people are over-analyzing concept footage that's the problem, but your right this isn't the place for it.
@TheEliteBrit: Dark energy plot had little to no development with only three or four mention's in optional mission's that's it. If that were the case Dark energy would have been integrated into the main plot of the trilogy (which it wasn't), though returning to Haestrom would be really good.
Question is : "Is the Andromeda Galaxy far enough away that BioWare can completely ignore ME3?"
Question is : "Is the Andromeda Galaxy far enough away that BioWare can completely ignore ME3?"
Yes, any galaxy is.
Bioware aren't going to ignore ME3 or the first two games for that matter when they are making the next one. They should learn from their mistakes made from the trilogy, ignoring those mistakes made in the trilogy will only cause more problems in future games.Question is : "Is the Andromeda Galaxy far enough away that BioWare can completely ignore ME3?"