It does NOT have to address these things. The genophage can be reimposed or cured independent of Shepard. There might be another Rachni queen floating about in space somewhere. And the Geth could be rebuilt.
This is just insane.
People were enraged about the handwaving of the rachni choice in ME1 and the decision of who to make Alliance Councillor. "Your choices don't matter" was an extremely common complaint even before ME3's ending.
How is it acceptable to do the same thing for every major choice in the game, just because you want the galaxy to continue on the way it was before Shepard existed? It's a ridiculous double standard. Either story consistency should be maintained always, or it shouldn't. Either choices and consequences are important, always, or they aren't. You can't have it both ways.
Retconning every decision the player ever made is probably the worst idea I've ever seen. Why did we even play the games if none of the decisions were important and lasting?
edit: just saw Barrett's post and this will be my last discussion of the endings in this thread.
Retour en haut
