Sitting in a @ccorfe mission review and seeing great work. This mission and one of mine are closely linked, so it's good to be aware of it.
I am not required in a review like this, but it is very good to see what things come up in it, because it will indirectly apply to me, too.
For instance, things that people like/enjoy I might be able to make use of, as well as avoiding things people don't like.
And that aside, this mission and mine have some thematic and narrative connections we need to make sure come together well. Video games!
If people have questions about process that is non-specific to ME:A, you can always ask. I don't mind answering when I can.
Ahhh @ccorfe used a thing I did for my mission and people think it's neat. Yay. 
<<<<<<<<<<(0)>>>>>>>>>>
Very good Jos. Nice to take a "peek" on a day's work.
The question, though, is the team getting enough "external" feedback?
The reason I'm asking (back in my IT days and before the internet) is because there was an incident where a bank branch mgr was complaining about long response times to query transactions and out internal tech tests showed less than two sec response times. I was asked by the VP to personally see the mgr. Turns out the mgr was concerned as follows:
1. Some retired bank customers were calling where long distance chargers applied and the customer had to pay them.
2. The customer forgot their account id so the query was made using their last names.
3. Some names are more common then others and the customers was kept waiting while the mgr scrolled through screens
--- and screens of names+addresses until the right one was found
4. This could take up to five minutes or more to get to the right account.
5. In the mean time our transaction response times were measured form the time the "enter" key was press until the first screen of data showed up
6. We insisted that transaction times were excellent while the mgr insisted it was not. The personal visit showed us our lack of understanding from a customer (mgr) and the client waiting on the phone point of view. Their view of a transaction is from the time the phone call was made until the mgr answered the customer's query on the state of their account.... see what I mean?
In you case Jos, peer reviews are nice but they are peer reviews and we (hint) are the customers.
Just sayin'