Mcfly616 wrote...
mechalynx wrote...
You guys aren't really serious, right? Right?
If you are, you'd benefit from (re)watching Alien and Aliens for some much needed education in where most of sci-fi inspiration comes from nowadays.
Definitely This. Lol
Like.....wtf are you people talking about? That's about.the.most backwards statement I heard in.awhile.....
Scott took absolutely nothing from Mass Effect......Mass Effect has every other major sci fi franchise to thank for it's design. Including Ridley Scott's Alien. Which Prometheus is a semi prequal to.....
Quit w.e drug it is that you are doing.....its not working out too well for you.....
Prometheus
#76
Posté 09 juin 2012 - 04:15
#77
Posté 09 juin 2012 - 04:17
The Angry One wrote...
clennon8 wrote...
Nail on the head. I don't understand all the fawning over this movie. It's nowhere near as good as Alien or Aliens
It's better than Alien 3 and Alien Ressurection? I mean, I haven't seen it yet. But it has to be.
Resurrection maybe.
#78
Posté 09 juin 2012 - 04:20
TMA LIVE wrote...
The Angry One wrote...
clennon8 wrote...
Nail on the head. I don't understand all the fawning over this movie. It's nowhere near as good as Alien or Aliens
It's better than Alien 3 and Alien Ressurection? I mean, I haven't seen it yet. But it has to be.
Resurrection maybe.
Meh, Alien 3 was nothing but a cheap rehash of Alien. Only it was very stupid. Anything's better than it.
HowdaretheykillHicksoffscreenthosebastards.
#79
Posté 09 juin 2012 - 04:22
That said it was still fun in a B monster movie way and the special effects were quite good.
#80
Posté 09 juin 2012 - 04:25
Arondell wrote...
My biggest gripe was the bahavior of the allegedly professional archeologists. Given that archeology is by most standards a very slow and careful profession they acted like ridiculous clowns. As soon as Dr. Holloway took off his helmet under those circumstances I felt he *deserved* to die. They acted like ten year olds in an amusement park not like they were exploring a millenia old alien ruin.
Welcome to Hollywood Archeology 101, taught by Dr. Jones.
Modifié par The Angry One, 09 juin 2012 - 04:25 .
#81
Posté 09 juin 2012 - 04:33
Arondell wrote...
My biggest gripe was the bahavior of the allegedly professional archeologists. Given that archeology is by most standards a very slow and careful profession they acted like ridiculous clowns. As soon as Dr. Holloway took off his helmet under those circumstances I felt he *deserved* to die. They acted like ten year olds in an amusement park not like they were exploring a millenia old alien ruin.
That said it was still fun in a B monster movie way and the special effects were quite good.
Spoilers
Well I thought the crowning moment of stupidity was when the Biologist happily reached out to a weird looking and clearly aggressive alien worm.
Or maybe it's when the geologist got lost in a cavern he had only just mapped with his own tech.
Modifié par Prosarian, 09 juin 2012 - 04:34 .
#82
Posté 09 juin 2012 - 04:34
#83
Posté 09 juin 2012 - 04:34
It was good first 20-30mins, I think. Music, "oldschool" spaceship design, David. Middle was deccent, up to the moment when David did that thing with glass of champain (or what was he drinking). Rest part is just awful. Especially - the very final part.
A lot of meat, a lot of corpses, a lot of something, seasoned with talks about Faith and Main Questions to Life the Universe and Everything. Bigest problem is that technically film is still good, it has nice chars and good designs....but not the plot. So, yeah, that part is pretty much ME3-like. How to take great setting, nice chars etc and make nonsense out of it. Alien(s) were bloddy and meaty as well, but those did not pretend to be anything more than just good sci-fi horrors. I'm not sure this film can exist out of series. As a stand-alone project it is just bad. As a pre-Alien project....it is bearable.
Modifié par Nrieh, 09 juin 2012 - 04:36 .
#84
Posté 09 juin 2012 - 04:52
#85
Posté 09 juin 2012 - 05:12
#86
Posté 09 juin 2012 - 05:12
I did not take her statement at face value at all. I thought she was being ironic. No one takes a ship full of death to a planet to ask a question. She went there for revenge, and to stop them from destroying Earth.TMA LIVE wrote...
Obadiah wrote...
Dude, she took the ship to the Engineer's home planet to kill them. That was my understanding.
No, she went there to ask them "Why?"
"and more importantly this is why Shaw says what
she says at the end of the movie. Which is, “I’m not going back to Earth
and calling it a day, I need to know a little bit more about what’s
happening here.” "
#87
Posté 09 juin 2012 - 05:14
And I saw Prometheus. I felt it could've been better. A lot of question at the end. This isn't ME related though so I wont go into detail.
#88
Posté 09 juin 2012 - 05:15
Obadiah wrote...
I did not take her statement at face value at all. I thought she was being ironic. No one takes a ship full of death to a planet to ask a question. She went there for revenge, and to stop them from destroying Earth.TMA LIVE wrote...
Obadiah wrote...
Dude, she took the ship to the Engineer's home planet to kill them. That was my understanding.
No, she went there to ask them "Why?"
"and more importantly this is why Shaw says what
she says at the end of the movie. Which is, “I’m not going back to Earth
and calling it a day, I need to know a little bit more about what’s
happening here.” "
She says she's going off the ask why, and you're assuming she's taking one ship to kill an entire race of aliens who made this thing, and probably have ways to deal with it. Or could shoot her ship out of the sky?
By the way, I quoted the writer. So yeah, it is face value. She's going off to ask them questions.
Modifié par TMA LIVE, 09 juin 2012 - 05:16 .
#89
Posté 09 juin 2012 - 05:16
Obadiah wrote...
I did not take her statement at face value at all. I thought she was being ironic. No one takes a ship full of death to a planet to ask a question. She went there for revenge, and to stop them from destroying Earth.TMA LIVE wrote...
Obadiah wrote...
Dude, she took the ship to the Engineer's home planet to kill them. That was my understanding.
No, she went there to ask them "Why?"
"and more importantly this is why Shaw says what
she says at the end of the movie. Which is, “I’m not going back to Earth
and calling it a day, I need to know a little bit more about what’s
happening here.” "
you missed the whole theme that movie was trying to convay watch it again there is no hint in her character wanting revenge
#90
Posté 09 juin 2012 - 05:20
The fact that it left questions unanswered would usually bother me, but it was so well-done that it prompted legitimate speculation instead of a night of pointing out plotholes and trying to solve them.
#91
Posté 09 juin 2012 - 05:26
#92
Posté 09 juin 2012 - 05:34
I think the opening really destroyed any tension or mystery for the rest of the movie.
Its possible i'm being too hard on it because of how high my expectations were or my preconceptions for the movie.
I was hard on chronicals of riddick too, but ended up liking it after seeing again a year or two later.
P.S. Charlize theron didn't do the pushups naked!! -1 star
#93
Posté 09 juin 2012 - 05:39
Leafs43 wrote...
Only thing I didn't like about Prometheus was the very end scene and how it broke away from Alien.
Spoilers!!!!!!
I thought that too, but this could be a completely different planet from alien. After the proto alien finally developes its possible this alien race came back here and found it. They were interested in bioweapons, so after finding the alien they might have changed from the black goop, to breeding aliens and dropping THEM on planets to coquer.
That would lead us to alien where one of those bioweapons got loose and got into the pilot. The pilot crashes and sends out a distress signal before he dies.
#94
Posté 09 juin 2012 - 05:40
The writer also said, "These are all hopefully questions and points of debate." She may very well be curious, but after seeing the effects of the black ooze, she obviously also has malicious intent in taking ship full of that stuff to them.TMA LIVE wrote...
...
She says she's going off the ask why, and you're assuming she's taking one ship to kill an entire race of aliens who made this thing, and probably have ways to deal with it. Or could shoot her ship out of the sky?
By the way, I quoted the writer. So yeah, it is face value. She's going off to ask them questions.
The movie leaves a lot up to the viewer. I'm planning to watch it again, but on frest viewing I saw a steely revenge. Others can say what they saw in the actress' performance.BTbuster2010 wrote...
...
you missed the whole theme that movie was trying to convay watch it again there is no hint in her character wanting revenge
Modifié par Obadiah, 09 juin 2012 - 05:41 .
#95
Posté 09 juin 2012 - 05:41
SolidisusSnake1 wrote...
This it was a pretty bad movie, a nonsensical plot, weird pacing, flat and uninteresting characters besides David and Shaw, and the movie is baically just one big setup for a sequel.
This. The movie had too many plot issues to take itself as seriously as it does.
#96
Posté 09 juin 2012 - 05:43
Obadiah wrote...
The writer also said, "These are all hopefully questions and points of debate." She may very well be curious, but after seeing the effects of the black ooze, she obviously also has malicious intent in taking ship full of that stuff to them.TMA LIVE wrote...
...
She says she's going off the ask why, and you're assuming she's taking one ship to kill an entire race of aliens who made this thing, and probably have ways to deal with it. Or could shoot her ship out of the sky?
By the way, I quoted the writer. So yeah, it is face value. She's going off to ask them questions.The movie leaves a lot up to the viewer. I'm planning to watch it again, but on frest viewing I saw a steely revenge. Others can say what they saw in the actress' performance.BTbuster2010 wrote...
...
you missed the whole theme that movie was trying to convay watch it again there is no hint in her character wanting revenge
In her defense, it wasn't like she had other ships to fly to them.
#97
Posté 09 juin 2012 - 05:44
Arondell wrote...
My biggest gripe was the bahavior of the allegedly professional archeologists. Given that archeology is by most standards a very slow and careful profession they acted like ridiculous clowns. As soon as Dr. Holloway took off his helmet under those circumstances I felt he *deserved* to die. They acted like ten year olds in an amusement park not like they were exploring a millenia old alien ruin.
That said it was still fun in a B monster movie way and the special effects were quite good.
Yeah, I was facepalming pretty hard when they all took off their helmets. You're on an alien planet, you don't know if there are any contagions or hostile lifeforms, you have no weapons, and you're taking off your freaking helmets.
...Not that the helmets actually protected them from anything, I should note.
#98
Posté 09 juin 2012 - 05:48
Obadiah wrote...
The writer also said, "These are all hopefully questions and points of debate." She may very well be curious, but after seeing the effects of the black ooze, she obviously also has malicious intent in taking ship full of that stuff to them.TMA LIVE wrote...
...
She says she's going off the ask why, and you're assuming she's taking one ship to kill an entire race of aliens who made this thing, and probably have ways to deal with it. Or could shoot her ship out of the sky?
By the way, I quoted the writer. So yeah, it is face value. She's going off to ask them questions.
How does viewers asking questions equal you thinking she's off to do what isn't what she claims? Same with the writer?
But hey, you want to make stuff up to make yourself happy, that's your choice.
Modifié par TMA LIVE, 09 juin 2012 - 05:50 .
#99
Posté 09 juin 2012 - 05:50
TMA LIVE wrote...
Obadiah wrote...
The writer also said, "These are all hopefully questions and points of debate." She may very well be curious, but after seeing the effects of the black ooze, she obviously also has malicious intent in taking ship full of that stuff to them.TMA LIVE wrote...
...
She says she's going off the ask why, and you're assuming she's taking one ship to kill an entire race of aliens who made this thing, and probably have ways to deal with it. Or could shoot her ship out of the sky?
By the way, I quoted the writer. So yeah, it is face value. She's going off to ask them questions.
How does viewers asking questions equal you thinking she's off to do what isn't what she claims?
But hey, you want to make stuff up to make yourself happy, that's your choice.
Judging by poundy mcmurders waking up on the wrong side of the bed reaction, having a ship full of planet killing weapons probably isn't such a bad idea when going to thier home planet to talk.
#100
Posté 09 juin 2012 - 05:51
Because her statements and actions are ambiguous and not fully defined.TMA LIVE wrote...
...
How does viewers asking questions equal you thinking she's off to do what isn't what she claims?
But hey, you want to make stuff up to make yourself happy, that's your choice.
On purpose.
A lot of the movie is like that. I like that kind of thing, maybe some don't.





Retour en haut






