209 réponses à ce sujet

[Oh Hai Gabby]

There was fail in script, though. Some things were tried that felt hollow (I.e. ---co-pilots)

[RobRam10]

I went to watch it and it was great overall for me but I agree with many the characters were not memorable at all.

[Zanallen]

I enjoyed the film, but it just seemed that parts didn't make any damn sense or were contrived. Not a great movie, but good.

[slimgrin]

I used my brain, thank you very much. It was lame writing, full of plot holes and a severe lack of character motivation. There is no explanation for anything, and the viewer is supposed to look it up online? Gimmie a break.

[Isaac Silvers]

A movie loses it's purpose when it fails to illustrate and explain a story. When you leave the theater with doubts about the most basic things it's safe to say that what you saw was a bad movie.
There are those movies who have ambiguous endings made to provoke intellectual discussion, however this was not the case with Prometheus. I'm sorry but there is no way I can sit through Prometheus and call it a good movie.

[TMA LIVE]

slimgrin wrote...

I used my brain, thank you very much. It was lame writing, full of plot holes and a severe lack of character motivation. There is no explanation for anything, and the viewer is supposed to look it up online? Gimmie a break.

Exactly. If you want me to speculate, then you shouldn't be giving me answers in an interview. The whole point of speculation is that I have to fill in the blanks, or come up with my own interpretation, which can be seperate from the creators. The fact that they're giving answers in an interview, that aren't clarified in the movie, tells me that I'm not suppose to speculate these things they're giving away. Because I can't speculate what you're telling me as what's suppose to be a fact. It's like if I speculate that something is red, but the creators are telling me it's blue in an interview. All that tells me is that I should think it's blue, but clearly I'm not. Which is a problem. It means they didn't do a good job clarifying it. It means I'm not getting what I should be interpreting.

Modifié par TMA LIVE, 19 juin 2012 - 07:47 .

[Siansonea]

I enjoyed the movie, but the story was rather weak. I enjoyed it for the visuals, for Michael Fassbender, for Charlize Theron, and for the visuals. Did I already mention the visuals? They were really solid. The movie really lacked the "teeth" of Alien and the sense of impending doom of Aliens. I never felt like NewRipley was ever in real danger, I knew she was going to survive to the end, and that everyone else would die. The fact that she salvaged NewAsh was a surprise, but that was about it. I see why they're trying to position it as unrelated to Alien, but that's kind of a cheat, I think. It's too similar to Alien to exist outside of that continuity.

Modifié par Siansonea II, 19 juin 2012 - 08:06 .