BOXING IS RIGGED: PACMAN VS BRADLEY
#1
Posté 10 juin 2012 - 05:10
PACQUIAO WON!!!
Enough said
#2
Posté 10 juin 2012 - 05:26
Personally, I scored this fight 8-4 for Manny, but lets face it, he faded late. He took the last 2 rounds off.... totally coasted the 12th and let Bradley dominate. Huge mistake. Judges like fighters who finish strong.
But whatever. The entire Landscape of Boxing has just been turned on its head, and THAT is what really matters. No More Pacquiao vs. Mayweather talk. no more Pacquiao vs. Marquez 4 anticipation. We now have to contend with an obligatory Pacquiao vs. Bradley 2, which personally, I have no interest in seeing. Rematches should come about organically... not forced upon us because of some manufactured controversey involving non-combatants. Pacquiao vs. Bradley wasn't even that good. So no. I don't want to see it again.
Modifié par Yrkoon, 10 juin 2012 - 05:36 .
#3
Posté 10 juin 2012 - 05:49
Seriously, I'm so happy the same happened to Pacquiao, karma. When he was asked about the Marquez fight, he would play it sly as if he won the match.
Someone needs to fix boxing as a sport, clean house, and keep it out of Las Vegas. I though Pacquiao dominated throughout the fight--it looked more like a mismatch. I don't care at all about seeing a Pacquiao/Bradley fight. Bradley is not an exciting fighter--has a big mouth, though, and I feel like he is mismatched against Pacquiao.
I'd rather see Mayweather or Marquez fight him, but now we have to deal with this stupid "rivalry."
#4
Posté 10 juin 2012 - 06:11
Now that he's screwed a fighter as admired as Pacquiao, maybe more will wake up to his BS.
#5
Posté 10 juin 2012 - 06:15
Yrkoon wrote...
We now have to contend with an obligatory Pacquiao vs. Bradley 2, which personally, I have no interest in seeing. Rematches should come about organically... not forced upon us because of some manufactured controversey involving non-combatants. Pacquiao vs. Bradley wasn't even that good. So no. I don't want to see it again.
Agreed.
Alarm bells went off in my head when I saw this
#6
Posté 10 juin 2012 - 06:22
Indeed. But Chances are they'll all swallow his kool-aid instead and pay to see the rematch, making him +millions richer, thus he's the winner in the end.JoeLaTurkey wrote...
Bob Arum's been screwing the sport for years: the man's so corrupt he makes Don King look like Martin Luther King.
Now that he's screwed a fighter as admired as Pacquiao, maybe more will wake up to his BS.
See, this is the manufactured BS we don't need or deserve. Boxing is awesome at producing its own drama. It doesn't Need a made-up storyline to push it along. Promoters will never understand this. None of them. Don King, Butch Lewis, Dan Duva, Oscar De la Hoya... They're all slimey, and ignorant to the real spirit of the sport.
Mayweather, Get your butt out of prison already and do something.
Modifié par Yrkoon, 10 juin 2012 - 06:27 .
#7
Posté 10 juin 2012 - 12:18
#8
Posté 10 juin 2012 - 12:29
#9
Posté 10 juin 2012 - 01:05
So no, it's not a question of karma. It seems to be a combination of a serious enough medical problem and a rigged judge panel. If he looks weak enough and has a rumor of a medical problem to help sell the story, then him losing wouldn't seem so outrageous. That's what seems to have happened.
It also helps them keep Mayweather from Manny, which is what fight promoters really want anyway.
#10
Posté 10 juin 2012 - 01:40
Modifié par Chouan, 10 juin 2012 - 01:40 .
#11
Posté 10 juin 2012 - 03:06
#12
Posté 10 juin 2012 - 04:23
Modifié par slimgrin, 10 juin 2012 - 04:24 .
#13
Posté 10 juin 2012 - 04:25
#14
Posté 10 juin 2012 - 04:25
A guy named Pacman is in it.
#15
Posté 10 juin 2012 - 04:27
Confess-A-Bear wrote...
You know, while the rigging to me isn't nothing new, and well the fact boxing has sucked the last several decades, you know how you can tell its hit a low?
A guy named Pacman is in it.
What? Are you saying boxing is bad because of him? Or that Pacman is corrupt? That's crazy, he's carried the sport for years now. And the 'bad for several decades nonsense' talk has to stop. The heavyweight division is bad, but there have always been great fights at lower weights. Carl Froch's destruction of Lucian Butte recently is evidence of that.
~edit
Modifié par slimgrin, 10 juin 2012 - 04:33 .
#16
Posté 10 juin 2012 - 04:30
Confess-A-Bear wrote...
You know, while the rigging to me isn't nothing new, and well the fact boxing has sucked the last several decades, you know how you can tell its hit a low?
A guy named Pacman is in it.
Ok, you just proved you don't know the sport. Nicknames have always been central to boxing. Every famous boxer in history has had a ridiculous nickname. No to mention that Manny has one of the best records in the history of the sport, a record that is two fights away of being an exact replica of Ali's record.
Ali
Wins: 56
Losses: 5
Manny:
Wins: 54
Losses: 4
Modifié par android654, 10 juin 2012 - 04:33 .
#17
Posté 10 juin 2012 - 04:33
And I don't want to know the sport, Manning was a, no sorry IS A Joke. And its funny you mention Ali. Back then at least the compititon was real. And honestly you have to go that far back to find when it was somewhat good to watch.
The crap we call boxing now, is just that. Crap.
Modifié par Confess-A-Bear, 10 juin 2012 - 04:34 .
#18
Posté 10 juin 2012 - 04:34
slimgrin wrote...
What? Are you saying boxing is bad because of him? Or that Pacman is corrupt? That's crazy, he's carried the sport for years now. And the 'bad for several decades nonsense' talk has to stop. The heavyweight division is bad, but there have always been great fights at lower weights. Carl Froch's destruction of Lucian Butte recently is evidence of that.
~edit
Don't bother, it's pretty clear most of the people here don't know a thing about boxing or the history of the sport.
#19
Posté 10 juin 2012 - 04:35
Confess-A-Bear wrote...
No I'm saying thats a ****ing stupid name. Its a gimmick, a Joke. Just like the "sport".
And I don't want to know the sport, Manning was a, no sorry IS A Joke. And its funny you mention Ali. Back then at least the compititon was real. And honestly you have to go that far back to find when it was somewhat good to watch.
The crap we call boxing now, is just that. Crap.
Well, at least you admit you're ignorance on the topic.
#20
Posté 10 juin 2012 - 04:37
Not knocking on Pro Wrestling OR Boxing, but I'm just putting it out there.
#21
Posté 10 juin 2012 - 04:40
Confess-A-Bear wrote...
No I'm saying thats a ****ing stupid name. Its a gimmick, a Joke. Just like the "sport".
And I don't want to know the sport, Manning was a, no sorry IS A Joke. And its funny you mention Ali. Back then at least the compititon was real. And honestly you have to go that far back to find when it was somewhat good to watch.
The crap we call boxing now, is just that. Crap.
Again, you just proved you don't know what you're talking about. Pac-man is a stupid nickname? Any dumber than Evander "Real Deal" Holyfield? Jerry "Wimpy" Halstead? Jersey Joe "Almond Cream" Walcott? O'Niel "Give 'em Hell" Bell? They're all stupid nicknames throughout the history.
If you knew anything about the sport, the form and conditioning of the ideal boxer, you'd know that Manny is the ideal image of the perfect boxer. You know this not just from his conditioning but his form in the ring.
Please stop b*tching about things you know nothing about.
#22
Guest_wiggles_*
Posté 10 juin 2012 - 04:41
Guest_wiggles_*
Modifié par wiggles89, 10 juin 2012 - 04:42 .
#23
Posté 10 juin 2012 - 04:42
LPPrince wrote...
Boxing might as well be as scripted as Professional Wrestling is.
Not knocking on Pro Wrestling OR Boxing, but I'm just putting it out there.
Exactly.
And sorry Slim when something turns to crap like Wrestling and Boxing have, I wash my hands with it. If you like to play with crap thats fine. But never ask me to shake your hand. I rather not have **** on my hands as well. Doesn't mean I don't know it. I just know when its time to kick it to the curb.
Also Andriod, no I happen to have liked most of those names, and cconditioning? The only thing that cump knows how to conditioning is his mouth. Yeah he's the perfect boxer today. A Joke of a man, a performer, that rolls in the money as thats all the sport is now. A Money Joke, and if you don't like my words you can kiss my ass tovarich. I knew the sport once, and what it is now, I don't want to be near. So dasvidaniya. In other words done with this sillieness. And in case you don't notice, the Opinions of the "ignorant savages" as always outnumber yours.
Modifié par Confess-A-Bear, 10 juin 2012 - 04:52 .
#24
Posté 10 juin 2012 - 04:49
wiggles89 wrote...
Marquez had it all wrong. You don't beat Pacquiao on points by thoroughly outboxing him (which Marquez did three times), you do it by letting him thoroughly outbox you!
And getting knocked on his ass like 7 times.
@confess-a-bear. Lay off the crazy sauce.
Modifié par slimgrin, 10 juin 2012 - 04:56 .
#25
Posté 10 juin 2012 - 05:03
Modifié par xsdob, 11 juin 2012 - 03:02 .





Retour en haut







