Aller au contenu

Photo

What if Bioware was preparing something big?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
220 réponses à ce sujet

#1
Alex_Dur4and

Alex_Dur4and
  • Members
  • 841 messages
What if, with all due respect and honnest desire to surprise the fan base, Bioware intended the EC to be more than it is advertised to be?

No one would ever hold them responsible to have shamlessly added more than anticipated in the EC... What if Bioware was preparing something big? Something like the IT or something completely different. Something we did not even think of that would blow our minds and to launch this title to unexpected greatness?

Please! Refrain yourself from insulting or accusing Bioware... Thank you!

P.S. This thread is not about IT and IT will not be discussed here!!!

Modifié par Alex_Dur4and, 10 juin 2012 - 05:00 .


#2
Billyg3453

Billyg3453
  • Members
  • 429 messages

Alex_Dur4and wrote...
What if Bioware was preparing something big? Something like the IT.

Stop.

#3
txmn1016

txmn1016
  • Members
  • 3 704 messages
I'm not counting on it, but yeah, in this case it would awesome if they promised less and delivered more. I'd love to be blown away by it.

#4
SwitchN7

SwitchN7
  • Members
  • 421 messages
I wish.I don't want the ME Universe to end.I want it to carry on and care more.It's very easy.When i'll stop loving what i see/get from them i will NOT SPEND ANOTHER CENT ON THEIR PRODUCT.Imagine that...Atm i am on Stand-By.I have faith and hope for the best.

Modifié par SwitchN7, 10 juin 2012 - 04:31 .


#5
spirosz

spirosz
  • Members
  • 16 354 messages
Should of been in the game in the first place, don't you think?

#6
RavenEyry

RavenEyry
  • Members
  • 4 394 messages
Unnecessary thread is unnecessary.

#7
UltimateTobi

UltimateTobi
  • Members
  • 727 messages
IF they go with IT, I'll be damn blown. Or if they pick up any theory around here, Indoctrination Theory, Beings of Light Theory, Dark Energy Theory. All would blow our mind if implemented correctly.

I am not blaming BioWare. I just couldn't believe the current ending to be true and thought "BioWare is hiding something and will release it". So I stood, and standing still, calmed. I trust BioWare here, they're creating something mind-blowing.

#8
BTbuster2010

BTbuster2010
  • Members
  • 439 messages

Billyg3453 wrote...

Alex_Dur4and wrote...
What if Bioware was preparing something big? Something like the IT.

Stop.


whats wrong with that if you ever heard the theroy its very intelligent yes its unlikely but theres no need

#9
GFOX7

GFOX7
  • Members
  • 195 messages
The first stage is denial...

#10
filetemo

filetemo
  • Members
  • 2 646 messages
the EC is nothing but cutscenes. No gameplay. Game play takes playtesting and bug-finding. No time for that.IT requires new gameplay. No gameplay = no IT.

#11
Grimez7

Grimez7
  • Members
  • 1 494 messages

RavenEyry wrote...

Unnecessary thread is unnecessary. I support this thread.


That's the spirit!

#12
Alex_Dur4and

Alex_Dur4and
  • Members
  • 841 messages

Billyg3453 wrote...

Alex_Dur4and wrote...
What if Bioware was preparing something big? Something like the IT.

Stop.


If you would take time to read the whole topic... maybe you could notice that this is NOT about IT.

Modifié par Alex_Dur4and, 10 juin 2012 - 04:44 .


#13
RavenEyry

RavenEyry
  • Members
  • 4 394 messages

filetemo wrote...

the EC is nothing but cutscenes. No gameplay. Game play takes playtesting and bug-finding. No time for that.IT requires new gameplay. No gameplay = no IT.

For the ten millionth time: it is not stated anywhere whatsoever that EC is nothing but cutscenes. Can everyone please stop spreading misinformation?

#14
Billyg3453

Billyg3453
  • Members
  • 429 messages

BTbuster2010 wrote...

Billyg3453 wrote...

Alex_Dur4and wrote...
What if Bioware was preparing something big? Something like the IT.

Stop.


whats wrong with that if you ever heard the theroy its very intelligent yes its unlikely but theres no need

Yes, everyone's heard the theory and alleged "evidence" of it 100x over.
IT was intelligent when it focused only on the codex entry and before EC was announced. Now it's expanded into litterally anything being support for it (Presidium tower shaped like a reaper = irrefutable proof of IT) Every piece of EC information goes as far as to almost outright deny IT unless you believe it was truly intended.

EC could be "big" without indoctrination. It's not the only solution, and definately not the best.

Modifié par Billyg3453, 10 juin 2012 - 04:39 .


#15
Joe Del Toro

Joe Del Toro
  • Members
  • 2 136 messages

Billyg3453 wrote...

Alex_Dur4and wrote...
What if Bioware was preparing something big? Something like the IT.

Stop.


Hammer Ti-oh never mind.

#16
RavenEyry

RavenEyry
  • Members
  • 4 394 messages

Billyg3453 wrote...
Yes, everyone's heard the theory and alleged "evidence" of it 100x over.

Thus my comment 'unnecessary thread is unnecessary.

#17
moater boat

moater boat
  • Members
  • 1 213 messages
If that where the case, their damage control efforts would have been handled much better.

#18
Helmschmied

Helmschmied
  • Members
  • 267 messages
You mean something like... Mass Shift?

#19
filetemo

filetemo
  • Members
  • 2 646 messages

RavenEyry wrote...

filetemo wrote...

the EC is nothing but cutscenes. No gameplay. Game play takes playtesting and bug-finding. No time for that.IT requires new gameplay. No gameplay = no IT.

For the ten millionth time: it is not stated anywhere whatsoever that EC is nothing but cutscenes. Can everyone please stop spreading misinformation?

"Clarification and closure" as told by Bioware themselves. That's not misinformation.
Also, common sense.

#20
BigEvil

BigEvil
  • Members
  • 1 194 messages

Billyg3453 wrote...

Alex_Dur4and wrote...
What if Bioware was preparing something big? Something like the IT.

Stop.


Hammer time!

I couldn't resist. Anyway, if they deliver more than the original statement and FAQ claims I'll probably be happy, but if it is IT or something along those lines that's not really a good thing IMO.

If they do add IT to the EC then it means one of two things as far as I can see:

A: Indoctrination was what they were going for so they gave us an incomplete ending originally.
B: They went with the most popular fan theory to appease as many as possible, so it's a bit of a cop-out.

B is acceptable, hell, the EC is all about trying to appease as many people who hated the endings as possible, but A is not good.

#21
The Night Mammoth

The Night Mammoth
  • Members
  • 7 476 messages

filetemo wrote...

RavenEyry wrote...

filetemo wrote...

the EC is nothing but cutscenes. No gameplay. Game play takes playtesting and bug-finding. No time for that.IT requires new gameplay. No gameplay = no IT.

For the ten millionth time: it is not stated anywhere whatsoever that EC is nothing but cutscenes. Can everyone please stop spreading misinformation?

"Clarification and closure" as told by Bioware themselves. That's not misinformation.
Also, common sense.


Way to refute what he said. 

Oh wait! 

It says nothing about gameplay. When challenged about it BioWare dismissed that it doesn't contain gameplay, but did not state either way.

Until it's released we wont know. 

#22
Alex_Dur4and

Alex_Dur4and
  • Members
  • 841 messages
PLEASE!! This thread is not about IT or denial about the ending... It's about Bioware going above and beyond expectation!

#23
RavenEyry

RavenEyry
  • Members
  • 4 394 messages

filetemo wrote...
"Clarification and closure" as told by Bioware themselves.

And how is that in any way a decleration of no gameplay?

#24
Grimwick

Grimwick
  • Members
  • 2 250 messages
I'll let you in on a little secret:

They aren't.

#25
Tom Lehrer

Tom Lehrer
  • Members
  • 1 589 messages

Alex_Dur4and wrote...

PLEASE!! This thread is not about IT or denial about the ending... It's about Bioware going above and beyond expectation!


Did we play the same ME3? BioWare failed to meet expectations in just about every aspect.