Nizaris1 wrote...
The Chantry always boasting about Andraste, but they don't even know where Andraste remain is, it was the Warden who manage to found the temple in DA:O, so what to expect truth from the Chantry? They just make everything up....
How come a religion organization don't even know where their beloved prophet remains?
If you ask, Muslims will simply say "prophet Muhammad peace be upon him grave/remains is in Madinah, An Nabawi Mosque, Arabia". Christian will say "Jesus was crucified in Jerusalem, everything about Jesus is at Jerusalem", but the Chantry simply say "WE DON'T KNOW!"
so how come?
Maybe. We've got a few tombs of saints but what about the prophets? Where is King David buried? We don't know for sure (though some tombs have been claimed to be his tomb). Where's Moses buried? Again we don't know. Does this mean King David and Moses were made up? No. King Athelstan (first king of England and probably the model for King Arthur) has a tomb with no remains within. What happened to them is disputed. Does this mean he was made up? No. You can't say someone is lying because there's no remains to be found.
Dragon Age lore states that Andraste's ashes (not her body which was burned) was put in that mountain by the disciples of Andraste. Why would they share where her ashes lay with everyone else? They have healing properties and people would have tried to have taken advantage of this and eventually there wouldn't be any ashes left.
I don't think The Chantry is lying and I don't think they have lied. That stupid old man darkspawn in DA2 Legacy rants about the Golden City and light and then darkness. It sounds to me that he was one of those magisters who invaded the Golden City. He's also a darkspawn who happens to be able to call Grey Wardens and darkspawn like an archdemon which seems to agree with the theory of him being one of the first darkspawn and one of the magisters who invaded heaven. This agrees with The Chantry's account of the darkspawn origin.
Then we have Andraste's ashes and their healing abilities. Magic was used before to try and cure Arl Demon but it didn't work whereas Andraste's ashes did. One could conclude from this that Andraste's ashes were supernatural and blessed or perhaps all that (supposedly) lyrium in the mountain had enchanted her ashes with great magical strength over the centuries. The lyrium in the mountain doesn't explain the immortal gaurdian however who knows about everyone's past. Perhaps this ability to know someone's past however is simply a mind-reading ability but I'm not sure if such a magical spell even exists in the DA universe. Mind-reading spell or not, magic and lyrium still doesn't explain his immortality.
Then we have the Black City itself which cannot be reached and yet it remains at the centre of the fade as though it's a testament to something.
Maybe The Chantry isn't 100% right but I think we can conclude that they have quite a lot of the truth in their books considering the fact that they appear to be right about the darkspawn's origins based on the evidence from the Legacy DLC.
I hate The Chantry but not the Templars. I hated the Templars in Dragon Age 2 however but in Dragon Age: Origins there were some really good Templars. Ser Otto comes to mind here. He makes it his personal duty to resolve the problem that is occuring in the Alienage. Regardless of your views on The Chantry, I think you have to agree that the Templars are needed to stop demons and abominations that arise.
Also, Tevinter has The "Black" Chantry whose views in magic are different from that of The "White" Chantry. TBC believes that magic shouldn't be surpressed hence why Tevinter is ruled by mages and not by TBC who are subject to the magisters. Templars also exist within TBC but they're only called out when an abomination or demon starts running rampart. Blood magic is actually existant in Tevinter as thou should very well know and TBC doesn't do a thing about it.
If The Chantry were more like TBC but still hated Blood Magic then I would be more for them. I don't agree with mages being imprisoned but there needs to be a form of law to make sure they don't start using blood magic.
I'm sort of neutral on The Chantry. They need to be reformed. That much I would say though. I think their beliefs on Andraste and The Maker are correct though but their magic beliefs should be reformed. With that said I can clearly say that I'm not for any of the mages in DA2 who were demonic possessed and blood mages. I sided with the Templars.
Modifié par Elton John is dead, 13 juin 2012 - 03:47 .