I think that's more evidence that your life is the thing that isn't working out so well.slyguy200 wrote...
That is for the game, and it is also before people bought it and realized how sloppy it is. The reviews are irrelavant. And it isn't working out so well, as evidence i use BSN.
Kimberly Brooks interview article, opinion of the ending no spoilers!
#51
Posté 13 juin 2012 - 04:58
#52
Posté 13 juin 2012 - 05:01
FlamingBoy wrote...
hey guys found an article about kimberly brooks, she reveals some things about the ec about we already feared (For those who don't know she is the voice of ashley williams)
1. that the ec voice acting is very simple
2. they are explaining the ending
3. they are trying to justify the ending
http://sticktwiddler...shley-williams/
thats the link, I would copy and paste it but I am having troubles with that computer function
You know what. I am definitely in the minority here.
I am comforted by this. Yes I'm being sincere. This news actually makes me happy. Not even trolling.
I'm glad to know that they're explaining the ending.
Don't know what is meant by "voice acting is very simple."
and I'm facinated to se how they "justify the ending."
Hit me if you want, but that is just my point of view.
#53
Posté 13 juin 2012 - 05:05
you all very well can be reading to much into it. i will not judge it until i play it myself
#54
Posté 13 juin 2012 - 05:05
The Razman wrote...
I think that's more evidence that your life is the thing that isn't working out so well.slyguy200 wrote...
That is for the game, and it is also before people bought it and realized how sloppy it is. The reviews are irrelavant. And it isn't working out so well, as evidence i use BSN.
Do you live with him?
#55
Posté 13 juin 2012 - 05:09
#56
Posté 13 juin 2012 - 05:09
Tazzmission wrote...
guys ever stop to think maybe she stated what she stated do to the nda?
you all very well can be reading to much into it. i will not judge it until i play it myself
Or maybe she just told it as it is. Not everything has to be spinned until it fits the bill. Even more so since it's only one sentence in a longer interview: "The sessions I’ve had so far have been really
simple, and Bioware’s not changing the ending, but it’s explaining and
justifying it more.”
#57
Posté 13 juin 2012 - 05:09
Abraham_uk wrote...
Hit me if you want
*throws a flying shoe*
#58
Posté 13 juin 2012 - 05:14
slyguy200 wrote...
That is for the game, and it is also before people bought it and realized how sloppy it is. The reviews are irrelavant. And it isn't working out so well, as evidence i use BSN.
Hahahahahaha. You're using the uber-geeks as a basis for how well something is working out? Geeks hate EVERYTHING. Find me a message board dedicated to one particular piece of entertainment that isn't *full* of people complaining about how terrible it is and how much better it used to be and (insert never-ending rant here).
#59
Posté 13 juin 2012 - 05:15
#60
Posté 13 juin 2012 - 05:15
abaris wrote...
Tazzmission wrote...
guys ever stop to think maybe she stated what she stated do to the nda?
you all very well can be reading to much into it. i will not judge it until i play it myself
Or maybe she just told it as it is. Not everything has to be spinned until it fits the bill. Even more so since it's only one sentence in a longer interview: "The sessions I’ve had so far have been really
simple, and Bioware’s not changing the ending, but it’s explaining and
justifying it more.”
dude she stated the same thing bioware already stated...........
dosent change anything other than she cant go into more detail
#61
Posté 13 juin 2012 - 05:17
mauro2222 wrote...
Abraham_uk wrote...
Hit me if you want
*throws a flying shoe*
who throws a shoe? honestly
#62
Posté 13 juin 2012 - 05:17
Tazzmission wrote...
guys ever stop to think maybe she stated what she stated do to the nda?
you all very well can be reading to much into it. i will not judge it until i play it myself
Isn't the point of an NDA that you can't say anything, period?
#63
Posté 13 juin 2012 - 05:18
Tazzmission wrote...
dude she stated the same thing bioware already stated...........
dosent change anything other than she cant go into more detail
Yeah, so. If it walks like a duck ....
Point being, we've heard that again and again. We've heard nothing to the contrary. Not even the usual PR spin to make it look better.
Modifié par abaris, 13 juin 2012 - 05:19 .
#64
Posté 13 juin 2012 - 05:22
When the EC was first announced Bioware stated that they were sticking to their artistic integrity and not altering the ending in any way. The stated purpose of the EC from the beginning was to 'clarify' the ending. Basically the statement by Kimberly Brooks is old news. If anyone was actually expecting changes to be made to the ending, you ignored what Bioware said when they first announced it.
No one should be shocked when the EC just makes the existing ending longer.
Unfortunately we're stuck with a bad ending. The last time there was any hope that ME3 would be redeemed was back in either March or April before the EC had been announced.
Modifié par Han Shot First, 13 juin 2012 - 05:24 .
#65
Posté 13 juin 2012 - 05:35
In the Islamic world it's a major insult.DStyles516 wrote...
mauro2222 wrote...
Abraham_uk wrote...
Hit me if you want
*throws a flying shoe*
who throws a shoe? honestly
#66
Posté 13 juin 2012 - 05:58
abaris wrote...
Tazzmission wrote...
dude she stated the same thing bioware already stated...........
dosent change anything other than she cant go into more detail
Yeah, so. If it walks like a duck ....
Point being, we've heard that again and again. We've heard nothing to the contrary. Not even the usual PR spin to make it look better.
and as i said before you assumed me3 wouldve ended the way the last 2 did did you not?
one small tiny little change isnt bad its expected and if you really hold bioware to there word all these years im sorry but you are a fool to do so if you really believe everything stays the same. ive learned things change and its time people catch up to it
to blantly think bioware lies or ea somehow paid millions to sabotage there own purchase is idiotic to believe imo. im not saying you yourself are idiotic but seriosuly the conspiracy theories need to stop
theres people on this board who have publicly stated there over the whole thing when that isnt true since they still rant and rave as usual still
Modifié par Tazzmission, 13 juin 2012 - 05:58 .
#67
Posté 13 juin 2012 - 06:00
In the clown world it's a major danger.D24O wrote...
In the Islamic world it's a major insult.DStyles516 wrote...
mauro2222 wrote...
Abraham_uk wrote...
Hit me if you want
*throws a flying shoe*
who throws a shoe? honestly
#68
Posté 13 juin 2012 - 06:03
Tazzmission wrote...
abaris wrote...
Tazzmission wrote...
dude she stated the same thing bioware already stated...........
dosent change anything other than she cant go into more detail
Yeah, so. If it walks like a duck ....
Point being, we've heard that again and again. We've heard nothing to the contrary. Not even the usual PR spin to make it look better.
and as i said before you assumed me3 wouldve ended the way the last 2 did did you not?
one small tiny little change isnt bad its expected and if you really hold bioware to there word all these years im sorry but you are a fool to do so if you really believe everything stays the same. ive learned things change and its time people catch up to it
to blantly think bioware lies or ea somehow paid millions to sabotage there own purchase is idiotic to believe imo. im not saying you yourself are idiotic but seriosuly the conspiracy theories need to stop
theres people on this board who have publicly stated there over the whole thing when that isnt true since they still rant and rave as usual still
Does that even make sense to you?
How is it a conspiracy theory to assume that they won't change the ending? Why would it be that EA paid millions to sabotage their own purchase?
From their point of view it's working as intended. They sold millions and make a nice little fortune with microtransactions and apps.
So what's the point of your post?
#69
Posté 13 juin 2012 - 06:12
abaris wrote...
Tazzmission wrote...
abaris wrote...
Tazzmission wrote...
dude she stated the same thing bioware already stated...........
dosent change anything other than she cant go into more detail
Yeah, so. If it walks like a duck ....
Point being, we've heard that again and again. We've heard nothing to the contrary. Not even the usual PR spin to make it look better.
and as i said before you assumed me3 wouldve ended the way the last 2 did did you not?
one small tiny little change isnt bad its expected and if you really hold bioware to there word all these years im sorry but you are a fool to do so if you really believe everything stays the same. ive learned things change and its time people catch up to it
to blantly think bioware lies or ea somehow paid millions to sabotage there own purchase is idiotic to believe imo. im not saying you yourself are idiotic but seriosuly the conspiracy theories need to stop
theres people on this board who have publicly stated there over the whole thing when that isnt true since they still rant and rave as usual still
Does that even make sense to you?
How is it a conspiracy theory to assume that they won't change the ending? Why would it be that EA paid millions to sabotage their own purchase?
From their point of view it's working as intended. They sold millions and make a nice little fortune with microtransactions and apps.
So what's the point of your post?
again i take it you didnt read that bioware said the same thing months ago so why act at all suprised?
if anyone really believes ea bought out bioware to destroy then yes i think they need alot of mental help let alone a buisness class or two
#70
Posté 13 juin 2012 - 06:18
Tazzmission wrote...
again i take it you didnt read that bioware said the same thing months ago so why act at all suprised?
if anyone really believes ea bought out bioware to destroy then yes i think they need alot of mental help let alone a buisness class or two
Say what?
First, I'm not the one being surprised they're not changing the ending. Others obviously are.
And I'm also not the one saying, EA bought them to destroy them.
So what are you trying to communicate?
#71
Guest_slyguy200_*
Posté 13 juin 2012 - 06:48
Guest_slyguy200_*
Uh, intentional ignorance, anybody? I mean that BSN is the evidence.The Razman wrote...
I think that's more evidence that your life is the thing that isn't working out so well.slyguy200 wrote...
That is for the game, and it is also before people bought it and realized how sloppy it is. The reviews are irrelavant. And it isn't working out so well, as evidence i use BSN.
#72
Posté 13 juin 2012 - 06:49
#73
Posté 13 juin 2012 - 06:54
abaris wrote...
Tazzmission wrote...
again i take it you didnt read that bioware said the same thing months ago so why act at all suprised?
if anyone really believes ea bought out bioware to destroy then yes i think they need alot of mental help let alone a buisness class or two
Say what?
First, I'm not the one being surprised they're not changing the ending. Others obviously are.
And I'm also not the one saying, EA bought them to destroy them.
So what are you trying to communicate?
Tazz is one of the people that believes we should open our wallets and thank Bioware fro the pleasure of them removing the money. What they give us in return isn't very important.
#74
Posté 13 juin 2012 - 07:06
sparkyo42 wrote...
abaris wrote...
Tazzmission wrote...
again i take it you didnt read that bioware said the same thing months ago so why act at all suprised?
if anyone really believes ea bought out bioware to destroy then yes i think they need alot of mental help let alone a buisness class or two
Say what?
First, I'm not the one being surprised they're not changing the ending. Others obviously are.
And I'm also not the one saying, EA bought them to destroy them.
So what are you trying to communicate?
Tazz is one of the people that believes we should open our wallets and thank Bioware fro the pleasure of them removing the money. What they give us in return isn't very important.
Proenders love selectivity.
I guess it is a "win" for proenders, but they seemingly glossed over this part:
The ASA acknowledged the complainants' belief that players' choices in the game did not influence the outcome to the extent claimed by EA.
They acknowledge that players choices did not influence as EAware claimed. Seems like people who didn't like the ridiculous, nonsensical ending, had a legitimate complaint and weren't the "entitled whiners" smug, elitist proenders tried to make them out to be...
Modifié par i IIVIIorpheus, 13 juin 2012 - 07:07 .
#75
Posté 13 juin 2012 - 07:08
They are destroying Bioware, not intentionally, but they are so out of tuch with the consumers and what they actually want. EA just wants their little assembly line for ****ting out unfinished games as fast as possbile, trying to make the most profit with little expense. And its going to work untill people have enough of it and demand quality products.Tazzmission wrote...
abaris wrote...
Tazzmission wrote...
abaris wrote...
Tazzmission wrote...
dude she stated the same thing bioware already stated...........
dosent change anything other than she cant go into more detail
Yeah, so. If it walks like a duck ....
Point being, we've heard that again and again. We've heard nothing to the contrary. Not even the usual PR spin to make it look better.
and as i said before you assumed me3 wouldve ended the way the last 2 did did you not?
one small tiny little change isnt bad its expected and if you really hold bioware to there word all these years im sorry but you are a fool to do so if you really believe everything stays the same. ive learned things change and its time people catch up to it
to blantly think bioware lies or ea somehow paid millions to sabotage there own purchase is idiotic to believe imo. im not saying you yourself are idiotic but seriosuly the conspiracy theories need to stop
theres people on this board who have publicly stated there over the whole thing when that isnt true since they still rant and rave as usual still
Does that even make sense to you?
How is it a conspiracy theory to assume that they won't change the ending? Why would it be that EA paid millions to sabotage their own purchase?
From their point of view it's working as intended. They sold millions and make a nice little fortune with microtransactions and apps.
So what's the point of your post?
again i take it you didnt read that bioware said the same thing months ago so why act at all suprised?
if anyone really believes ea bought out bioware to destroy then yes i think they need alot of mental help let alone a buisness class or two





Retour en haut






