PreGy wrote...
Did I say that? Oh, yeah, I DIDN'T, because that ain't true. But then you get upset if I say you lie in your "arguments"... History of Mankind.
And if I seem angry in your eyes, then I must say:
- I'm sorry, it is not my intend. I try to highlight the key things here, Sorry if you felt "attacked".
- As I stated on my post, I hate people lying to make their points. LOGIC + ARGUMENTS = DEBATE. No room for lies.
- I'm not from an english country, so I have to get straight to the point, so I don't make complicated sentences. I wish I could write better, know how to imply a particular mood in a written post (it's hard on my language, so I can only guess how hard must be try to know how a foreign person feel by what he writes <--- this is why I prefer short sentences :S)
I will repeat my points in case you would like to read and be open about them:
- Respawns are the same. If you kill 2 Primes, and there is "room" for another two, they will respawn. It has always been this way. And this is NOT like to have "4-5 Primes on the map".
- HM nerf has very little to do with survival.
- I don't mind "less skill" players playing. Why should I? I hate lies, tough.
- I haven't ever demand anything on this forum I think. Why you have to "throw" at me what other people may have said in other threads?
I would not say that Bekkael is lying. Since you believe that it's impossible to have 4+ primes on a map, but Bekkael believes otherwise, then the correct term would be "mistaken" rather than "lying". Her post is honest, and she is not intending to deceive anyone.
The difference between a lie and being mistaken is a common misconception even among native English speakers. A lie is intentionally giving the wrong information; Bekkael believes her information is correct.
I was going to comment on the tone of your post, but since you've said English isn't your first language, that's forgivable. So I'm going to try to be helpful.
"Did I say that? Oh, yeah, I DIDN'T, because that ain't true." Here you're using sarcasm, and except when used humorously, sarcasm is rude (this generalization will probably get me yelled at, but I think it's a good rule of thumb). To me, this sounds like you're attacking Bekkael and gives off the impression that you're angry.
Using CAPITALS is often read as yelling on the internet, so when you
capitalize words like "lie" it sounds aggressive. Though this is
certainly up to you how you want to format your post, in my opinion emphasis should only be
used for what's VERY important in a post. Using
bold and
italics are also great for adding emphasis to your post.
Calling someone a liar also puts their integrity into question, which can be seen as aggressive.
Back on topic:
I won't make a stand either way on the prime issue, since a) I don't know and
I don't really count primes, I just shoot and run. But the amount of primes was also discussed earlier in the thread.
Cyonan wrote...
They can spawn instantly after being
rocketed. I've even had 2 spawn right next to 2 that I had just
rocketed, just out of my line of sight(but then entered it a second
later).
but the wave wont let any more than 3 at a time exist.
Bekkael wrote...
This is absolutely right. They do seem to
spawn in pairs in matches I'm in, at least on the later objective
rounds. With hunter vision, I've seen two sets of Primes at the same
time on silver, which is when I always grab my rockets. I thought there
were supposed to be that many Primes on silver objective waves,
but...maybe that's a bug too? [smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/surprised.png[/smilie]
Whether there are 3, 4, 5 or 18 primes, the issue was more about how some rounds are drastically more difficult than others. Which I can completely agree with.
Grotaiche wrote...
Also, ask the right questions. Instead of "BioWare, why
did you do that" or "BioWare, could you please do this", ask "Skilled
players, how can I do this" or "Dear community, how do I work around
that". In short : BioWare barely replies to questions, especially
whinings or demands. Ask yourself what YOU can control instead of
relying on what you can't.
I completely agree. I've played enough MMORPGs that I've become pretty numb to nerfs. Instead of complaining about a change, adapt and find something new that works well, if not better.
Anytime I want to play a new class, the first thing I do is come to these forums and use the search bar. There's a lot of good information here and plenty of helpful people that can send you in the right direction for whatever playstyle you want.
In all honesty, I think nerfs and buffs can extend the life of the game, because it forces you to play in different styles. Though I'm sure a lot of people disagree with me, but like I said, I'm numb to the changes.
Retour en haut
I have gotten to the point of topping the scoreboard on most of my silver matches, so that's an improvement over bottom score on bronze. I don't want it to be stressfully difficult to play, just pleasantly challenging. Today, it certainly wasn't enjoyable. 
