216 réponses à ce sujet

[Shepard Wins]

Lord Luc1fer wrote...

estebanus wrote...

paxxton wrote...

estebanus wrote...

Lord Luc1fer wrote...

Shepard Wins wrote...

estebanus wrote...

paxxton wrote...

@estebanus: Are you going to nuke another thread?

Just maybe...

YOU UNDERESTIMATE MY POWER!

But what if the thread HAS THE HIGH GROUND?

But estabanus could nuke a thread this lame even with no legs or arms..

Don't underestimate my nukes, because I've got... METAL GEAR!

And a few cardboxes to hide in.

You see? You see? They'll never see my attack coming! It's the perfect thread deterrent force!

Nobody expects the estebanus inquisition!

Goooood. GOOOOOD! Let the derail FLOW THROUGH you!

[Grimwick]

Did you miss the bit where THIS NEVER HAPPENED?
Pure 100% speculation proves nothing. there is no justification for this theory and the burden of proof lies on YOU! You can't turn around and say disprove me, that's not how logic works.

IT theorists have at least provided circumstancial evidence to back up their speculations. You have provided absolutely none.

There's no point in even replying to a thread which is based on making events up.

[paxxton]

Dwailing wrote...

paxxton wrote...

Dwailing wrote...

paxxton wrote...

estebanus wrote...

paxxton wrote...

@estebanus: Are you going to nuke another thread?

Just maybe...

YOU UNDERESTIMATE MY POWER!

Calm down with some music:

Ah, that brings back memories. (Stares dreamily off into the distrance)

That kind of adventure games only bring Indiana Jones and the Fate of Atlantis into my mind.

Have you ever played a Monkey Island game?  If not: 

I did.  Starting with 4.

Modifié par paxxton, 15 juin 2012 - 10:30 .

[Lord Luc1fer]

paxxton wrote...

@estebanus: Are you going to nuke another thread?

 

NUKE, I am your father!

[estebanus]

And finally... WITNESS THE POWER OF METAL GEAR!

[Sire Styx]

*sigh*
I came here expecting some sort of discussion and evidence. I'm supporter of the IT, but I also like to see other theories. But it irritates me when people do things like this :\\

[estebanus]

Sire Styx wrote...

*sigh*
I came here expecting some sort of discussion and evidence. I'm supporter of the IT, but I also like to see other theories. But it irritates me when people do things like this :

NO ONE EXPECTS AN INTELLIGENT SEIVAL THREAD!

[Lord Luc1fer]

Sire Styx wrote...

*sigh*
I came here expecting some sort of discussion and evidence. I'm supporter of the IT, but I also like to see other theories. But it irritates me when people do things like this :

There was no evidence to discuss. the so-called 'theory' was a thinly veiled trolling attempt

[paxxton]

estebanus wrote...

Sire Styx wrote...

*sigh*
I came here expecting some sort of discussion and evidence. I'm supporter of the IT, but I also like to see other theories. But it irritates me when people do things like this :

NO ONE EXPECTS AN INTELLIGENT SEIVAL THREAD!

C'mon. The idea of a virtual reality ending is quite intriguing. Even if hardly grounded in any evidence.

Modifié par paxxton, 15 juin 2012 - 10:35 .

[Lord Luc1fer]

estebanus wrote...

Sire Styx wrote...

*sigh*
I came here expecting some sort of discussion and evidence. I'm supporter of the IT, but I also like to see other theories. But it irritates me when people do things like this :

NO ONE EXPECTS AN INTELLIGENT SEIVAL THREAD!

[estebanus]

paxxton wrote...

estebanus wrote...

Sire Styx wrote...

*sigh*
I came here expecting some sort of discussion and evidence. I'm supporter of the IT, but I also like to see other theories. But it irritates me when people do things like this :

NO ONE EXPECTS AN INTELLIGENT SEIVAL THREAD!

C'mon. The idea of a virtual reality ending is quite intriguing. Even if hardly grounded in any evidence.

Isn't it obvious that this is the intoxication theory 3.0?

[paxxton]

estebanus wrote...

paxxton wrote...

estebanus wrote...

Sire Styx wrote...

*sigh*
I came here expecting some sort of discussion and evidence. I'm supporter of the IT, but I also like to see other theories. But it irritates me when people do things like this :

NO ONE EXPECTS AN INTELLIGENT SEIVAL THREAD!

C'mon. The idea of a virtual reality ending is quite intriguing. Even if hardly grounded in any evidence.

Isn't it obvious that this is the intoxication theory 3.0?

Judging from the OP's post it is  but the idea itself is interesting.

[Lord Luc1fer]

estebanus wrote...

paxxton wrote...

estebanus wrote...

Sire Styx wrote...

*sigh*
I came here expecting some sort of discussion and evidence. I'm supporter of the IT, but I also like to see other theories. But it irritates me when people do things like this :

NO ONE EXPECTS AN INTELLIGENT SEIVAL THREAD!

C'mon. The idea of a virtual reality ending is quite intriguing. Even if hardly grounded in any evidence.

Isn't it obvious that this is the intoxication theory 3.0?

Following through this logic, I can conclude that 2 + 2 = firetruck

[Dwailing]

estebanus wrote...

Sire Styx wrote...

*sigh*
I came here expecting some sort of discussion and evidence. I'm supporter of the IT, but I also like to see other theories. But it irritates me when people do things like this :

NO ONE EXPECTS AN INTELLIGENT SEIVAL THREAD!

Estebanus, do you REALLY want to go down this path again? 

BTW, is that emoticon appropriate for the emotion I want to convey, or did I just frak up mightily?

Modifié par Dwailing, 15 juin 2012 - 10:39 .

[estebanus]

Lord Luc1fer wrote...

estebanus wrote...

paxxton wrote...

estebanus wrote...

Sire Styx wrote...

*sigh*
I came here expecting some sort of discussion and evidence. I'm supporter of the IT, but I also like to see other theories. But it irritates me when people do things like this :

NO ONE EXPECTS AN INTELLIGENT SEIVAL THREAD!

C'mon. The idea of a virtual reality ending is quite intriguing. Even if hardly grounded in any evidence.

Isn't it obvious that this is the intoxication theory 3.0?

Following through this logic, I can conclude that 2 + 2 = firetruck

This proves poopthesis as fact!

[estebanus]

Dwailing wrote...

estebanus wrote...

Sire Styx wrote...

*sigh*
I came here expecting some sort of discussion and evidence. I'm supporter of the IT, but I also like to see other theories. But it irritates me when people do things like this :

NO ONE EXPECTS AN INTELLIGENT SEIVAL THREAD!

Estebanus, do you REALLY want to go down this path again? 

Kinda yes, but I won't.

[estebanus]

Anyway Seival, I have a playthrough where I didn't do the geth consensus mission.

Does that mean that the endings are literal for me?

[Lord Luc1fer]

Being compeltely serious now, the main reason we can disprove the consensus theory with a different method than one used to disprove ITis the presence of legion in the consensus. Shepard's journey through the consensus is very much a shared one, whereas the grounding for IT is that when shepard comes to after the harbinger beam, we have no company in the same way to ground us in reality. Sure, anderson and TIM are there, but not to start with, so they didn;t enter the hallucination with us and so could be generated in the mind. Legion entered the consensus with us, and as such kept us grounded in the real world.. Feel free to debunk this stuff if you disagree

[HellishFiend]

lol, this is cute. If the OP were a kid I'd pinch his widdle cheeks for being so adorable.

[Lord Luc1fer]

HellishFiend wrote...

lol, this is cute. If the OP were a kid I'd pinch his widdle cheeks for being so adorable.

I could scrape the contempt off of that post and spread it on my toast

[paxxton]

estebanus wrote...

Anyway Seival, I have a playthrough where I didn't do the geth consensus mission.

Does that mean that the endings are literal for me?

No. It means that you played the game wrongly.

[munnellyladt]

Lord Luc1fer wrote...

Being compeltely serious now, the main reason we can disprove the consensus theory with a different method than one used to disprove ITis the presence of legion in the consensus. Shepard's journey through the consensus is very much a shared one, whereas the grounding for IT is that when shepard comes to after the harbinger beam, we have no company in the same way to ground us in reality. Sure, anderson and TIM are there, but not to start with, so they didn;t enter the hallucination with us and so could be generated in the mind. Legion entered the consensus with us, and as such kept us grounded in the real world.. Feel free to debunk this stuff if you disagree

Mate, dont waste your time explaining anything to this troll.
All he's thinking is"I'm right and everybody else is wrong so i'm going to show all these people that i'm smarterer then them."
All he is,is a troll nothing more.

[Lord Luc1fer]

munnellyladt wrote...

Lord Luc1fer wrote...

Being compeltely serious now, the main reason we can disprove the consensus theory with a different method than one used to disprove ITis the presence of legion in the consensus. Shepard's journey through the consensus is very much a shared one, whereas the grounding for IT is that when shepard comes to after the harbinger beam, we have no company in the same way to ground us in reality. Sure, anderson and TIM are there, but not to start with, so they didn;t enter the hallucination with us and so could be generated in the mind. Legion entered the consensus with us, and as such kept us grounded in the real world.. Feel free to debunk this stuff if you disagree

Mate, dont waste your time explaining anything to this troll.
All he's thinking is"I'm right and everybody else is wrong so i'm going to show all these people that i'm smarterer then them."
All he is,is a troll nothing more.

No! I CAN control them!
/Illusive Man

[deltacypresss]

munnellyladt wrote...

Lord Luc1fer wrote...

Being compeltely serious now, the main reason we can disprove the consensus theory with a different method than one used to disprove ITis the presence of legion in the consensus. Shepard's journey through the consensus is very much a shared one, whereas the grounding for IT is that when shepard comes to after the harbinger beam, we have no company in the same way to ground us in reality. Sure, anderson and TIM are there, but not to start with, so they didn;t enter the hallucination with us and so could be generated in the mind. Legion entered the consensus with us, and as such kept us grounded in the real world.. Feel free to debunk this stuff if you disagree

Mate, dont waste your time explaining anything to this troll.
All he's thinking is"I'm right and everybody else is wrong so i'm going to show all these people that i'm smarterer then them."
All he is,is a troll nothing more.

That might be giving seival too much credit.

[munnellyladt]

Lord Luc1fer wrote...

munnellyladt wrote...

Lord Luc1fer wrote...

Being compeltely serious now, the main reason we can disprove the consensus theory with a different method than one used to disprove ITis the presence of legion in the consensus. Shepard's journey through the consensus is very much a shared one, whereas the grounding for IT is that when shepard comes to after the harbinger beam, we have no company in the same way to ground us in reality. Sure, anderson and TIM are there, but not to start with, so they didn;t enter the hallucination with us and so could be generated in the mind. Legion entered the consensus with us, and as such kept us grounded in the real world.. Feel free to debunk this stuff if you disagree

Mate, dont waste your time explaining anything to this troll.
All he's thinking is"I'm right and everybody else is wrong so i'm going to show all these people that i'm smarterer then them."
All he is,is a troll nothing more.

No! I CAN control them!
/Illusive Man

You can control them?!

YOU'RE INDOCTRINATED!!!