896 réponses à ce sujet

[Catamantaloedis]

 The most pathetically astonishing contribution that this community has granted to the Internet is one of the most detestable gathering of unrelated ideas, speculations, non sequiturs, fallacies, optimistic guesses, and genuine idiocies ever assembled among humankind. It is the most vile, repugant denial of apparent truth, being, of course, the ending of the Mass Effect series, which is (quite apparently) meant to be taken at a literal, face value. Therefore I ask, I demand, that each person reevaluate his interpretation of the ending. Do so long, and hard. Finally, realize the delusion of your ways and the fallacy of the Indoctrination Delusion and reject is as it is and as it always has been--the fan fiction of a mentally disturbed 10 year old child which has reached the very levels of religion. It is delusion. It is a lie.

http://desmond.image...ng&res=landing 

Modifié par Catamantaloedis, 16 juin 2012 - 01:59 .

[PreciousIsland]

 This is a troll post but you are right.

[Catamantaloedis]

PreciousIsland wrote...

 This is a troll post but you are right.

This is not a troll post. I have posted my opinion about this several times already, but could ignore this phenomenon no longer without making a topic about it, as much as I didn't want to.

[D24O]

If you're attacking the belief that IT is planned, I'm inclined to agree, but with the ending geared to promote lotsa speculation any interpretation is technically valid.
Oh and nice to see your green check marks are still crooked.

[Catamantaloedis]

D24O wrote...

If you're attacking the belief that IT is planned, I'm inclined to agree, but with the ending geared to promote lotsa speculation any interpretation is technically valid.
Oh and nice to see your green check marks are still crooked.

You can speculate on the endings. However, you cannot speculate on the facts of the endings which are very clearly presented to us.

[Taboo]

Thank you Caligula.

He doesn't lie though, he presents a fallacy.

There's a difference.

[Adugan]

Cameltoedis makes lots of posts like this. Maybe he thinks he is trolling, maybe he doesnt. This still is trolling though.

[llbountyhunter]

Catamantaloedis wrote...

D24O wrote...

If you're attacking the belief that IT is planned, I'm inclined to agree, but with the ending geared to promote lotsa speculation any interpretation is technically valid.
Oh and nice to see your green check marks are still crooked.

You can speculate on the endings. However, you cannot speculate on the facts of the endings which are very clearly presented to us.

nice opinion.

[alec1898]

Adugan wrote...

Cameltoedis makes lots of posts like this. Maybe he thinks he is trolling, maybe he doesnt. This still is trolling though.

He's completely right, though. This is all on ****ty writing.

[D24O]

Catamantaloedis wrote...

D24O wrote...

If you're attacking the belief that IT is planned, I'm inclined to agree, but with the ending geared to promote lotsa speculation any interpretation is technically valid.
Oh and nice to see your green check marks are still crooked.

You can speculate on the endings. However, you cannot speculate on the facts of the endings which are very clearly presented to us.

 I disagree. There are few facts given in the ending, and nothing is presented clearly, there's a lot of speculatin' room, enough for IT. Also, I am not a believer in IT, just soz you know.

[Catamantaloedis]

llbountyhunter wrote...

Catamantaloedis wrote...

D24O wrote...

If you're attacking the belief that IT is planned, I'm inclined to agree, but with the ending geared to promote lotsa speculation any interpretation is technically valid.
Oh and nice to see your green check marks are still crooked.

You can speculate on the endings. However, you cannot speculate on the facts of the endings which are very clearly presented to us.

nice opinion.

Facts are objective. No speculation can change facts. I hope this news is not new to you or you have been living a sad, sad life indeed.

[PreciousIsland]

It is trolling whether you think it is or not. You can't argue with people like IIbountyhunter. I tried posting a response in one of his IT threads and he just says, "Nice opinion," as if that means something.

[llbountyhunter]

Catamantaloedis wrote...

llbountyhunter wrote...

Catamantaloedis wrote...

D24O wrote...

If you're attacking the belief that IT is planned, I'm inclined to agree, but with the ending geared to promote lotsa speculation any interpretation is technically valid.
Oh and nice to see your green check marks are still crooked.

You can speculate on the endings. However, you cannot speculate on the facts of the endings which are very clearly presented to us.

nice opinion.

Facts are objective. No speculation can change facts. I hope this news is not new to you or you have been living a sad, sad life indeed.

im sorry you call the eding factual? its a terrible open ended mess.

[D24O]

Also, I still love this picture you made.
http://desmond.image...png&res=landing

[alec1898]

PreciousIsland wrote...

It is trolling whether you think it is or not. You can't argue with people like IIbountyhunter. I tried posting a response in one of his IT threads and he just says, "Nice opinion," as if that means something.

Sadly people just don't want to believe that bioware has fallen so far.

llbountyhunter wrote...
im sorry you call the eding factual? its a terrible open ended mess.

He calls the fact that this is the ending bioware wanted factual. Don't try to illude yourself.

Modifié par alec1898, 16 juin 2012 - 01:32 .

[Catamantaloedis]

llbountyhunter wrote...

Catamantaloedis wrote...

llbountyhunter wrote...

Catamantaloedis wrote...

D24O wrote...

If you're attacking the belief that IT is planned, I'm inclined to agree, but with the ending geared to promote lotsa speculation any interpretation is technically valid.
Oh and nice to see your green check marks are still crooked.

You can speculate on the endings. However, you cannot speculate on the facts of the endings which are very clearly presented to us.

nice opinion.

Facts are objective. No speculation can change facts. I hope this news is not new to you or you have been living a sad, sad life indeed.

im sorry you call the eding factual? its a terrible open ended mess.

Did I say the ending was factual? No. No, I don't believe I did. I said that the ending has facts in it, which no amount of speculation and nonsense theories can change.

Modifié par Catamantaloedis, 16 juin 2012 - 01:31 .

[SplendorMan]

Excuse me op, but have you ever been to do so more what like?

[llbountyhunter]

Catamantaloedis wrote...

llbountyhunter wrote...

Catamantaloedis wrote...

llbountyhunter wrote...

Catamantaloedis wrote...

D24O wrote...

If you're attacking the belief that IT is planned, I'm inclined to agree, but with the ending geared to promote lotsa speculation any interpretation is technically valid.
Oh and nice to see your green check marks are still crooked.

You can speculate on the endings. However, you cannot speculate on the facts of the endings which are very clearly presented to us.

nice opinion.

Facts are objective. No speculation can change facts. I hope this news is not new to you or you have been living a sad, sad life indeed.

im sorry you call the eding factual? its a terrible open ended mess.

Did I say the ending was factual? No. No, I don't believe I did. I said that the ending has facts in it, which no amount of speculation and nonsense theories can change.

And i havent seen anytheory that changes the fact.

Good day.

[PreciousIsland]

People who believe in IT want to believe in IT. They don't want to believe that someone wrote a bad ending to ME. They need some kind of canonical authority around this and they don't want that canonical authority to be weak and stupid. But it is.

So they believe in IT. IT is so stupid that you have to really want to believe it to believe it. Only stupid people believe in IT. You would have to be stupid to not see that IT would be a badly-written ending itself, thereby negating the very purpose of believing in IT in the first place.

Stupid people cannot be argued with rationally. They need to be herded around.

[alec1898]

llbountyhunter wrote...

Catamantaloedis wrote...

llbountyhunter wrote...

Catamantaloedis wrote...

llbountyhunter wrote...

Catamantaloedis wrote...

D24O wrote...

If you're attacking the belief that IT is planned, I'm inclined to agree, but with the ending geared to promote lotsa speculation any interpretation is technically valid.
Oh and nice to see your green check marks are still crooked.

You can speculate on the endings. However, you cannot speculate on the facts of the endings which are very clearly presented to us.

nice opinion.

Facts are objective. No speculation can change facts. I hope this news is not new to you or you have been living a sad, sad life indeed.

im sorry you call the eding factual? its a terrible open ended mess.

Did I say the ending was factual? No. No, I don't believe I did. I said that the ending has facts in it, which no amount of speculation and nonsense theories can change.

And i havent seen anytheory that changes the fact.

Good day.

These are the type of people I will lol at when IT is false.

[Catamantaloedis]

llbountyhunter wrote...

Catamantaloedis wrote...

llbountyhunter wrote...

Catamantaloedis wrote...

llbountyhunter wrote...

Catamantaloedis wrote...

D24O wrote...

If you're attacking the belief that IT is planned, I'm inclined to agree, but with the ending geared to promote lotsa speculation any interpretation is technically valid.
Oh and nice to see your green check marks are still crooked.

You can speculate on the endings. However, you cannot speculate on the facts of the endings which are very clearly presented to us.

nice opinion.

Facts are objective. No speculation can change facts. I hope this news is not new to you or you have been living a sad, sad life indeed.

im sorry you call the eding factual? its a terrible open ended mess.

Did I say the ending was factual? No. No, I don't believe I did. I said that the ending has facts in it, which no amount of speculation and nonsense theories can change.

And i havent seen anytheory that changes the fact.

Good day.

This isn't even coherent.

[Catamantaloedis]

PreciousIsland wrote...

People who believe in IT want to believe in IT. They don't want to believe that someone wrote a bad ending to ME. They need some kind of canonical authority around this and they don't want that canonical authority to be weak and stupid. But it is.

So they believe in IT. IT is so stupid that you have to really want to believe it to believe it. Only stupid people believe in IT. You would have to be stupid to not see that IT would be a badly-written ending itself, thereby negating the very purpose of believing in IT in the first place.

Stupid people cannot be argued with rationally. They need to be herded around.

There is much truth in what you say.

[D24O]

What about IT are you attacking. The interpretation of the ending itself, or the belief that the ending was intended to be incomplete?

[zambot]

PreciousIsland wrote...

People who believe in IT want to believe in IT. They don't want to believe that someone wrote a bad ending to ME. They need some kind of canonical authority around this and they don't want that canonical authority to be weak and stupid. But it is.

So they believe in IT. IT is so stupid that you have to really want to believe it to believe it. Only stupid people believe in IT. You would have to be stupid to not see that IT would be a badly-written ending itself, thereby negating the very purpose of believing in IT in the first place.

Stupid people cannot be argued with rationally. They need to be herded around.

So much stupid in this post.  I mean that literally, not as an insult.

[alec1898]

D24O wrote...

What about IT are you attacking. The interpretation of the ending itself, or the belief that the ending was intended to be incomplete?

Obviously both.