wsandista wrote...
Catamantaloedis wrote...
wsandista wrote...
If you start a thread attacking their belief that there is a unicorn in their backyard, then you should have some evidence to support your claim.
You are side-stepping the argument again, so I will have to ask again: Why is the idea commonly known as "Indoctrination Theory" incorrect? Make sure you provide examples and thoroughly explain why all evidence contradicts the idea in question.
Is it that hard of a question to answer for one who has been arguing against the validity of the theory?
No, if someone repeatedly says that there is a unicorn in their backyard, and we demand that they provide factual evidence of this, and they are unable to, I am still not responsible to prove the existence of this unicorn. The lack of evidence is proof itself.
You still have not provided any evidence against the idea commonly known as "Indoctrination Theory".
Once more: Why is the idea commonly known as "Indoctrination Theory" incorrect?
IT supporters have provided evidence here on this thread, yet you ignore them and side-track into arguments such as "what constitutes a theory". I can either assume you are a coward, talking out your ass, or a troll, possibly all three.
He doesn't have any evidence to disprove anything he just a troll.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut








