Plaintiff wrote...
Mages are slain and raped by templars so they don't have any advantage over the peasantry in that regard.
But under normal circumstances, those Templar have to answer to their superiors. The Chantry doesn't approve of Templar abusing their assets, the Grand Cleric or Knight-Commander should step in and stop them from doing so and remove them from rank.
While under normal circumstances, nobility gets a slap on the wrist by their superiors or just pays off the guard and nothing happens. The Alienage is culled a few times and nothing happens to the people involved, people's homes can be burned and no authority steps in and nobility can rape women and get away with it because they control the wages of everyone who'd investigate.
Isolation from society may help them when it comes to avoiding disease, but there's nothing to support the suggestion that they fare better in a famine than anyone else. In fact, there is nothing at all to support the idea that the peasants suffer disproportionately more than the mages do.
Considering any food going to the Circle would probably be shared with the Templar and how the Chantry "controls" the people, the nobility and even the Monarchs themselves, I'd assume they have fairly good influence in food trade should a famine ever occur.
Maybe they don't give food to mages, though I doubt they'd leave their greatest asset starve and possibly die / refuse to work for them. Rebellions are caused over famine and we know the Chantry has been actively trying to prevent that for a long time.
But even if they do, being a victim of circumstance is not comparable to being actively imprisoned by others. A gilded cage is still a cage. All the luxuries in the world do not make up for the trauma of being torn from your family, or losing your own children in turn.
Though it's important to note that every nation--except for Rivain--take mages away from family and their children, though. While Tevinter is viewed as a nation of free mages, their control of children is notable because perhaps it shows that even they fear the potential of personal attachments and how they influence a mage (they even kept track of any mage lineages).
Perhaps the luxaries don't make up for it to some, though.
They do not make up for losing the right to choose your career.
Well, it's not like being outside offers many different alternatives. Perhaps mages would create more job opportunities for themselves such as healers and the like, though that's assuming the commoners accept them and don't simply burn down their places (like they do with elves who try to be something other than a gutter rat).
Least inside they're given safety and they--as Lucrosians show--can have many different jobs through affiliates, making money and buying things for themselves.
They do not make up for being constantly watched by men who are trained to kill you.
Shouldn't really bother them if they're not doing anything "wrong" at the time, I doubt Irving / Finn / Wynne and other mages like them fear the Templar once they've "accepted" their fate. Same reason the commoners wouldn't fear the guard or Orlesians wouldn't fear the Chevaliers.
They do not make up for having to live with the constant threat of beating or rape.
Back to first point.
They do not make up for knowing you could be executed without warning for being arbitrarily deemed "unfit" for testing.
During normal circumstances, they don't execute the mage--they make them tranquil after evidence has been presented to the First Enchanter. Burden of proof being on the Templar is a luxuary for the mages, though they probably don't understand it.
Yeah, no. Expecting mages to feel anything other than resentment is ridiculous.
I don't expect them to feel happy about their predicament, though to say that mages are being treated horribly isn't that great of an excuse when everybody else is treated worse. I assume a large section of mages would go "what the hell is this ****" when they come out and see the world and realise they were treated better inside the Circle.
Some would probably see it as a viable excuse to try and forge something like Tevinter 2.
Other people in Thedas might have it worse. So what? That does not invalidate the legitimacy of the claim that mages are treated unfairly... *child militias and lgtb*
Kind of does. Remove the whole "human rights" and modern view of ethics and morals and suddenly the idea of everyone being treated equally would get you laughed at, there's only two roles in this case: Those worst off than you and those better off than you.
When the commoner sees the mage's fine silk robes and their quarters, they wouldn't understand the mage's complaints because they see the mage lifestyle as something superior to theirs--which invalidates their complaint because "they're acting spoiled", the commoner has no heed for the restrictions which the mage has imposed on him.
Which is why so many find Templar preferable to simply living their current lifestyle, they recieve similar benefits despite all the restrictions they themselves have imposed on them--including the lyrium addiction and having difficulty to have any family.