what irony? 2 of most powerful mage robes look like chanty robe
#1
Posté 18 juin 2012 - 06:04
#2
Posté 18 juin 2012 - 06:08
Or seriously trolling anti-Chantry mage fans.Meeeps wrote...
what is the idea behind this, the robe of overseer and Enchanter Illana, all look like ordinary chantry robes. Any reason for this or were the devs simply too lazy?
#3
Posté 18 juin 2012 - 06:53
In DAO, the mages are lazy and decadent, so they never dressed correctly.
Most powerful mage in the game? Morigan. She can't die. Flemeth? Can die. Was she wearing pants? Incorrect. Wearing a mu-mu? Correct.
All of this has been confirmed to me by someone who was (not actually) a dev.
Modifié par RinpocheSchnozberry, 18 juin 2012 - 06:54 .
#4
Posté 18 juin 2012 - 07:28
#5
Posté 18 juin 2012 - 07:53
#6
Posté 18 juin 2012 - 08:05
Meeeps wrote...
I meant, the most powerful robes are from the chantry, the most "anti-mage" party in DA world
I was going to explain how that's not strange at all, but decided if you hadn't figured out how the mages and Chantry work together by now, it would take too many words to explain again.
The Chantry isn't "anti mage." They have never made an attempt to wipe out mages. They, in fact, reined in the previously independent paramilitary version of the Templars and tried to make them into protectors rather than persecutors. Pretty much failed at that in the big picture, but "Chantry policy" is not anti mage, regardless of whether individual priestesses are.
#7
Posté 18 juin 2012 - 08:07
Vormaerin wrote...
Meeeps wrote...
I meant, the most powerful robes are from the chantry, the most "anti-mage" party in DA world
I was going to explain how that's not strange at all, but decided if you hadn't figured out how the mages and Chantry work together by now, it would take too many words to explain again.
The Chantry isn't "anti mage." They have never made an attempt to wipe out mages. They, in fact, reined in the previously independent paramilitary version of the Templars and tried to make them into protectors rather than persecutors. Pretty much failed at that in the big picture, but "Chantry policy" is not anti mage, regardless of whether individual priestesses are.
I'm not entirely sure the chantry would however sponsor legendary level robes that'd make a mage abit of a badass. Just because you cloth a person doesn't mean you arm them.
#8
Posté 18 juin 2012 - 08:11
Pzykozis wrote...
I'm not entirely sure the chantry would however sponsor legendary level robes that'd make a mage abit of a badass. Just because you cloth a person doesn't mean you arm them.
Mages are the ones who do the enchanting, not the Chantry. I would imagine they would enchant whatever they had available. Which would be robes provided by the Chantry.
#9
Posté 18 juin 2012 - 09:27
#10
Posté 19 juin 2012 - 12:09
RinpocheSchnozberry wrote...
Eeeeeeverybody knows that MAGE PANTS are much better than mage robes.
I actually agree. The mage pants in DA: Dawn of the Seeker were awesome!
#11
Posté 19 juin 2012 - 12:47
The mage pants in DA: Dawn of the Seeker remind me of these one-piece, hooded pyjamas that I own. They're phenomenally comfortable.Ponendus wrote...
RinpocheSchnozberry wrote...
Eeeeeeverybody knows that MAGE PANTS are much better than mage robes.
I actually agree. The mage pants in DA: Dawn of the Seeker were awesome!
Ahem.
Actually, mage pants make a lot of sense. When there isn't an actual war on, mages spend a lot of their time in cold stone towers doing largely sedentary things. Skirts do nothing to keep the drafts out. When there is an actual war on, mages spend a lot of their time moving around and fighting things. Long, dew-soaked robes slapping around the ankles must get really annoying. Although there is that whole "Everybody kissing everybody" thing that Anders mentioned. Robes are said to be useful there.
But yeah, I'm definitely in favor of greater variety in the mage wardrobe department. It would be beyond cool if players could decide whether they wanted it to be a robe or pants. Say if you equipped an item in one slot, it was robes; in the other slot, it would be pants. It would probably be more trouble than it's worth. Maybe just offer enough cool stuff in both categories to provide variety.
#12
Posté 19 juin 2012 - 05:33
I usually play Legacy and MotA post-game, and my mages keep their Champion robes on, despite the dlc "upgrades".
#13
Posté 24 juin 2012 - 12:10
#14
Posté 24 juin 2012 - 04:42
Meeeps wrote...
I don't have any knowledge about the DA universe except the games, so from my view Templers have the only purpose to control the mages and are a division of the chantry, is that wrong? So how can thre be any group be more against the mages?
Yeah, the templars control the Chantry controlled Circles, and the templars are subordinate to the Chantry of Andraste. Meredith is subordinate to Grand Cleric Elthina. People have different views of the Chantry, depending on whether they agree or disagree with the Chantry controlled Circles.
Considering how some view the Chantry and the templars, they see them being against the mages because of their conduct. As Cullen says, templars have "divine right" over mages; that's an issue for some people.
#15
Posté 24 juin 2012 - 08:17
#16
Posté 24 juin 2012 - 10:51
#17
Posté 25 juin 2012 - 06:38
Ponendus wrote...
RinpocheSchnozberry wrote...
Eeeeeeverybody knows that MAGE PANTS are much better than mage robes.
I actually agree. The mage pants in DA: Dawn of the Seeker were awesome!
no, they weren't. with the exception of the lead, they were all in yoga pants and hoodies. i wear robes, yoga pants, and hoddies at home to be a schlump. they do not spell badass just because they're pants. ROTC, Warden Issue Robes, ROTNP, the apostate's robes you start with in DA2...THOSE are awesome.





Retour en haut






